Here it is!

https://mailchi.mp/90f69a6cf477/lost-einsteins-project

Using Mailchimp for now because it's free. I also made a discord server if you're interested:

https://discord.gg/cKc4VeRxjr

Both are barebones and will be revised in my spare time. I don't expect to work on them much because I'm not trying to develop a following.

I'm low-key convinced that this is either:

1. A spam vulnerability test for various instances/communities. (With good or bad intentions.)
2. A doxxing attempt. (Some links lead to addresses.)

If the latter, I hope we can reverse the negativity by creating a GoFundMe for her or something.

Haha, no need to thank me!

It was more out of survival instincts and gauging my environment.

Unfortunately, I don't even know what the argument is, so I'd need you to provide context.

I'm just trying to understand how irrational or aggressive Lemmy is towards women.

Thank you for describing the bear vs man thing to me. So it was basically a question posted on social media, and then the reactions to the question (and maybe others' comments) was divisive?

Oh dang, I was told it didn't matter which instance I joined. 😭

I chose it from some join Lemmy website.

Nothing on that website or on the instance sign up page shows the settings or permissions of the instance. It would be nice to view those before signing up.

Wake up, people. Reject mathematics. Reject formalism.

This is a really good response. Thank you.

I think we can have both the benefits of democracy being decentralized and resistant to systemic manipulation, and of technocracy having some minimum bar to deter ignorant individuals from harming society. There are trade-offs for sure, but currently, we the people ultimately voted for someone who openly said he'd impose tariffs (among other things).

One potential example (among many, many possibilities) is a system where academic organizations and think tanks stake their reputation to nominate candidates, and then the people vote on them.

For example, let's say the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) nominates a pro-tariff candidate to manage economic policy. And then let's say the people end up voting for them. After the tariffs wreck the economy, the reputation of the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) will deteriorate considerably. In the next election, the people will vote the candidate out and ignore future EPI nominations.

I don't trust people either. 😭 I had no idea about the EU vs climate protestors. That's wild.

That would be the ideal, but even without AI, you can still have a society that is more technocratic-leaning than it is now. It's not like technocracies were historically impossible before AI existed.

I agree about the problem you mentioned. I would not trust someone who is proposing their AI will magically fix all of society's problems.

Heck yeah!

(I just learned the formatting: !trendingcommunities@feddit.nl)

Subscribed! Thank you. 😌

Oh my gosh, thank you so much. 🥺 If you know of any evidence-based mental health resources, I'll create a post of them.