I wouldn't call something with 5m views and 100k likes "underground" tbh. But that's just how I see it, you're free to have your own understanding and I'm not saying it's unwelcome or against the rules. Just wanted to share my opinion and explain why I disliked this particular one.
Mostly ambient, dub techno and minimal house. I post some of it to [email protected] One neat trick I learned this week is that you can choose random sorting at bandcamp tag pages: https://bandcamp.com/discover/electronic?s=rand (it's called "surprise me" in dropdown)
Yes. Blur kind of gradually spreads color of every pixel into all directions, reverb's doing the same with sound. Did you know that the simplest type of reverb is delay with super short time? I would personally consider lossiness (or cutoff effect) of blur a side effect of pixel giving away a bit of it's color to its surroundings. Filter on the other hand is a cutoff that just takes but doesn't put it back somewhere else.
Definitely not what you're asking for, but this is what I got reminded of: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BzQ0ytaJtk 😅
I think blur can also be associated with reverb
Does it look different to you or do you mean text posts?
spoiler
view more: next ›
Good point. I'd agree — Coltrane, being a legend of jazz, isn’t really 'underground' either, at least on a global timescale. It’s more that jazz — especially free jazz — has become underground and largely unknown in the last decade or two, compared to earlier times when it was more widely recognized.