You wanna change a nice dog because is not useful to your needs? You don't deserve a dog.
Even so. You can always make a screencapture.
Decentralized, yeah sure!
Honestly, suing pirates is like kicking a tree to prove it’s still alive, it doesn't change the game. Piracy isn’t the villain here; it’s practically part of the success story.
DING DING DING DING
A photo of you and your family with a dollar bill in a ziploc. "Hope this antique has value now!"
Oh, ok then. I trust you now.
Oh my god, people here are so over theirself it's so sad.
Enjoy it or stop watching. You don't need to suffer.
I loved old Futurama, and I choose to watch the new episodes because I really like the show. Some more than others, that's it. I'm really grateful they are making more episodes.
In Europe you own your data. Don't you have the California act or something like that there?
The only answer for what you are looking is Signal (user base). The next thing would be Whatsapp, so .... Signal... Just signal.
Yeah they did it in a garage!!!! What is your excuse??????? You only need a garage and no cars in it!!!!
Srsly fuck that narrative.
Dsklnsadog
0 post score0 comment score
I think the disagreement comes from treating “we have laws” as automatically meaning “we must enforce them everywhere at any cost.” The method matters. This approach flips the burden of proof by treating everyone as a minor unless they prove otherwise. That is a pretty extreme shift from how things normally work in the real world.
We also shouldn’t pretend this actually solves the problem. Kids got access to adult magazines before, and they will get access now through a parent’s phone, shared devices, or older friends. If that’s the target, this kind of system is mostly symbolic while adding friction and control for everyone else.
And more importantly, it normalizes something much bigger. Once you accept that accessing legal content requires proving attributes through some approved system, it becomes very easy to expand that logic. Today it’s age. Tomorrow it can be anything else.
So I don’t see this as a balanced compromise. It’s a disproportionate response to an enforcement gap, with long-term consequences that go way beyond the original problem.