[–] 2 points 22 hours ago

The French and USA had military bases in the Sahel since the early 2010s to "fight terrorism", but never seemed to succeed. Almost like the terrorists were Western-funded (leftovers from destroying Libya earlier), and just an excuse for placing bases there.

Now that the Sahel States kicked the West out, brought in Russian help, and are crushing the terrorists, Ukraine and the USA suddenly start helping the terrorists. Sus.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 23 hours ago* (1 child)

    Where'd you get the image in the post? We hear so little about socialist Laos in Western media.

    It reminds me, is there any news of high speed rail being built in North Korea? I can't wait for the day North Korea gets HSR before the USA California HSR is finished.

    One day we will be able to ride HSR from Vietnam and Laos through China into North Korea. The world's best train trip of socialism.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 days ago*

    You got a source for this chart? It's pretty useful.

    Also funnily enough in 2025 the US defense budget was ~$900 billion, for 2027 it's $1.5 trillion, pretty much matching China yuan for dollar, which is insane.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    Good points, though IDK if European financial institutions are as puppeted by the USA as European politicians. For now the EU is still buying US treasuries, but if they stopped things would be bad for the US, and this AI switcheroo would definitely make them stop if they have any sovereignty.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (5 children)

    This is possible, but I don't see how they could get away with this "solution". Wouldn't the most obvious solution to AI wiping everyone's savings out be just to restore the savings one-to-one as normal dollars, so that that would be the first proposal by everyone? Done correctly, it should be nothing but a blip with no inflationary effects, because the amount of money from the US economy before and after is exactly the same.

    Doing this would basically ruin the U.S. financial system's reliability on the world stage forever. What would any of the U.S.'s allies think to see that all money in the U.S. can get wiped by a single unhappy AI?

    Also, if they do this, everyone at OpenAI and Anthropic is going to get lynched. There will be congressional hearings and loads of regulations on AI, which is exactly what the videomaker said capitalists were trying to avoid from 2008. These regulations would significantly delay capitalists' ultimate goal of full automation of all human labor to replace the working class entirely.

    On the consolidation after 2008, that stuff happened because the big banks were in the right place at the right time to snap up the floundering smaller ones. No grand plan is needed, only basic capital accumulation. I don't see how it correlates to some AI monetary crisis.

  • source
  • [–] [S] 13 points 4 days ago*

    I don't disagree that buying crypto today is dumb. I just thought that the liberals would have enough sense to call Trump out on rugpulling without getting involved themselves. Trump handed them such a free win, only for Hunter Biden (and also former New York Mayor Eric Adams, who also did a rug pull) to go, "I wanna scam too."

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    This Wednesday, Hunter Biden launched the $LAPTOP crypto coin, only for it to crash 98% by Thursday while 'mystery traders' of the coin have made windfall profits. ^[https://wset.com/news/nation-world/hunter-bidens-meme-coin-down-98-since-being-launched-report-crypto-laptop-social-media] ^[https://futurism.com/future-society/hunter-biden-laptop-memecoin-crypto-rugpull-national-disgrace]

    This exactly mirrors Trump's and Melania's earlier crypto rugpulls. This universal scammy behavior is the most visual example of the equivalence between liberals and conservatives. Both will scam the working class to enrich capitalists.

     

    After her side job as Biden's Commerce Secretary in charge of suppressing Chinese technological innovation, Gina Raimondo has now gone back to her main job of licking capitalist boot by suppressing any mention of wealth redistribution like UBI.

    UBI is the only relatively mainstream solution to AI layoffs that isn't just straight socialism.

    Joe Biden's Former commerce secretary Gina Raimondo has decided that UBI in response to AI is the thing to fear most. She said: "I personally think it's like the end of America."

    She is now heading up a newly-launched extremely well-funded organization to make sure the country reaches for anything but a basic income in response to AI. It's called RAISE US, and the money behind it comes largely from the companies building the disruption it exists to manage.

    RAISE US launched June 25, with Raimondo as CEO and former Indiana governor Eric Holcomb as co-chair. It has already secured more than $500 million toward a $1 billion target. Amazon, Anthropic, Microsoft, and the OpenAI Foundation are anchor partners. Behind them sits a wall of corporate and philanthropic money: Blackstone, General Motors, IBM, Eli Lilly, Mastercard, Deloitte, UPS, Cisco, Workday, Arnold Ventures, and a dozen more.

    The article goes on to show that RAISE US's advertised alternative to UBI, job retraining programs, is proven to be as ineffective as one single community college course is at improving job prospects. RAISE US's entire job is to mount excuse after excuse to allow capitalists to capture all profit from replacing everyone's jobs, while making it appear like it's the workers' fault for not keeping up.

     

    Who could have possibly foreseen this? /s

    It's almost like when these AI CEOs constantly tell their investors how they're going to make everyone homeless and jobless, then all the workers start taking them seriously and seeing them as the threat that they are.

    As I have posted before:

    There are only 2 ways the worker-capitalist contradiction can ever be solved:

    • communism, where the abundant fruits of automation are distributed evenly among all, ala fully automated luxury communism
    • exterminism (from Peter Frase’s book Four Futures), where the capitalists finally fulfill their dream of automating everything and can genocide all the unneeded workers.

    It’s quite important we bring about revolution before option 2 becomes viable.

     

    This video by Adam Ragusea (a pretty mainstream food channel) looks at how U.S. hereditary farms often preserve quasi-feudal relationships where large farm landowners exert control over migrant and trafficked laborers, recreating power imbalances similar to feudal lord-serf dynamics.

    Along the way, he makes a nice overview focusing on the advent of capitalism as a progressive force against feudalism, and how US farmers, whose practices are descended from southern feudal slave plantation owners, still preserve some unproductive, harmful aspects of feudalism.

     

    In the West, we have heard endless news stories about the advent of clean hydrogen. Unfortunately, it is mostly a ploy by Western fossil fuel companies, lying about repurposing their natural gas infrastructure for hydrogen in order to be allowed to keep burning natural gas for longer. As a result, actual progress on clean hydrogen is very slow and has basically not grown beyond the existing chemicals industry.

    In China, hydrogen production is a serious and intensive field of research and scaling, with the potential to help make China fossil fuel independent.

    submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by to c/china@lemmygrad.ml
     

    This on-the-ground documentary is amazing for dispelling persistent myths about Chinese food safety. In the early 2000s, China had a series of scandals and subsequent police crackdowns around waste cooking oil, which was being scooped out of sewage grease traps and being reprocessed into disguised brand new cooking oil.

    While this was a legitimate problem, Westerners somehow still believe that to this day, all Chinese food is still cooked in waste gutter oil. In actuality, China has cracked down completely on uses of gutter oil for human consumption and has instead created productive industries to turn waste gutter oil into valuable products like hydraulic oil, machine lubricant, and sustainable aviation fuel.

    This kind of waste-to-products recycling is exactly what we need more of.

    submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by to c/china@lemmygrad.ml
     

    The Chinese government has spent half a century, and continuing today, working to restore degraded environments.

    China began by greening the Loess Plateau, a formerly productive forest and grassland ecosystem turned into a sandy wasteland by centuries of exploitative farming. The government work with villagers on the ground to change farming practices, build dams and terraces, plant trees, and more. Altogether, the project restored 4 million acres and lifted 2.5 million people out of poverty.

    See more: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2G79sIJ97w


    China then applied these same practices to greening the Gobi and Taklamakan Deserts, stopping sandstorms, halting the growth of the deserts, and restoring former desert into productive grassland:

    Caption says forest coverage increased from 8% to 73%.

    See more: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91vrHrcVJ_w

    submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by to c/breadtube@lemmygrad.ml
     

    In the process, he debunks mainstream economists' lies that AI will definitely increase wages, and explains how the Industrial Revolution in Europe (the classic example for how technology improves living standards), actually:

    • didn't increase living standards in Europe for 200 years until after WW2 (and even then only due to militant labor organizing)
    • required colonialism and imperialism abroad in the Global South, reducing their living standards until even today

    I've found Gary's Economics to be an amazing stepping-stone channel to introduce liberals to leftist economics. He basically uses Marxist economics but never explicitly says so, making his points very palatable to libs.

    submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by to c/asklemmygrad@lemmygrad.ml
     

    I have not seen a good explanation on this from Americans, who usually peddle the brainless "they hate our freedom" line. Lemmygrad is also sorely lacking any good discussions on this topic.

    The U.S. funded the mujahideen to drain Soviet resources in Afghanistan. This makes it rather strange that after the Soviet Union collapsed, Al-Qaeda (one of the factions in the mujahideen) would turn around and bite the hand that fed them.

    Was Al-Qaeda dissatisfied with some aspect of U.S. treatment toward them and expected the 9/11 attacks to change that? Or did the U.S. and Israel tacitly allow or even encourage the attacks to provide an excuse to dominate the Middle East?

    I would love more sources and reading on this that aren't just pro-US-empire propaganda!

    view more: next ›