After her side job as Biden's Commerce Secretary in charge of suppressing Chinese technological innovation, Gina Raimondo has now gone back to her main job of licking capitalist boot by suppressing any mention of wealth redistribution like UBI.

UBI is the only relatively mainstream solution to AI layoffs that isn't just straight socialism.

Joe Biden's Former commerce secretary Gina Raimondo has decided that UBI in response to AI is the thing to fear most. She said: "I personally think it's like the end of America."

She is now heading up a newly-launched extremely well-funded organization to make sure the country reaches for anything but a basic income in response to AI. It's called RAISE US, and the money behind it comes largely from the companies building the disruption it exists to manage.

RAISE US launched June 25, with Raimondo as CEO and former Indiana governor Eric Holcomb as co-chair. It has already secured more than $500 million toward a $1 billion target. Amazon, Anthropic, Microsoft, and the OpenAI Foundation are anchor partners. Behind them sits a wall of corporate and philanthropic money: Blackstone, General Motors, IBM, Eli Lilly, Mastercard, Deloitte, UPS, Cisco, Workday, Arnold Ventures, and a dozen more.

The article goes on to show that RAISE US's advertised alternative to UBI, job retraining programs, is proven to be as ineffective as one single community college course is at improving job prospects. RAISE US's entire job is to mount excuse after excuse to allow capitalists to capture all profit from replacing everyone's jobs, while making it appear like it's the workers' fault for not keeping up.

Who could have possibly foreseen this? /s

It's almost like when these AI CEOs constantly tell their investors how they're going to make everyone homeless and jobless, then all the workers start taking them seriously and seeing them as the threat that they are.

As I have posted before:

There are only 2 ways the worker-capitalist contradiction can ever be solved:

• communism, where the abundant fruits of automation are distributed evenly among all, ala fully automated luxury communism
• exterminism (from Peter Frase’s book Four Futures), where the capitalists finally fulfill their dream of automating everything and can genocide all the unneeded workers.

It’s quite important we bring about revolution before option 2 becomes viable.

This video by Adam Ragusea (a pretty mainstream food channel) looks at how U.S. hereditary farms often preserve quasi-feudal relationships where large farm landowners exert control over migrant and trafficked laborers, recreating power imbalances similar to feudal lord-serf dynamics.

Along the way, he makes a nice overview focusing on the advent of capitalism as a progressive force against feudalism, and how US farmers, whose practices are descended from southern feudal slave plantation owners, still preserve some unproductive, harmful aspects of feudalism.

In the West, we have heard endless news stories about the advent of clean hydrogen. Unfortunately, it is mostly a ploy by Western fossil fuel companies, lying about repurposing their natural gas infrastructure for hydrogen in order to be allowed to keep burning natural gas for longer. As a result, actual progress on clean hydrogen is very slow and has basically not grown beyond the existing chemicals industry.

In China, hydrogen production is a serious and intensive field of research and scaling, with the potential to help make China fossil fuel independent.

This on-the-ground documentary is amazing for dispelling persistent myths about Chinese food safety. In the early 2000s, China had a series of scandals and subsequent police crackdowns around waste cooking oil, which was being scooped out of sewage grease traps and being reprocessed into disguised brand new cooking oil.

While this was a legitimate problem, Westerners somehow still believe that to this day, all Chinese food is still cooked in waste gutter oil. In actuality, China has cracked down completely on uses of gutter oil for human consumption and has instead created productive industries to turn waste gutter oil into valuable products like hydraulic oil, machine lubricant, and sustainable aviation fuel.

This kind of waste-to-products recycling is exactly what we need more of.

The Chinese government has spent half a century, and continuing today, working to restore degraded environments.

China began by greening the Loess Plateau, a formerly productive forest and grassland ecosystem turned into a sandy wasteland by centuries of exploitative farming. The government work with villagers on the ground to change farming practices, build dams and terraces, plant trees, and more. Altogether, the project restored 4 million acres and lifted 2.5 million people out of poverty.

See more: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2G79sIJ97w

China then applied these same practices to greening the Gobi and Taklamakan Deserts, stopping sandstorms, halting the growth of the deserts, and restoring former desert into productive grassland:

Caption says forest coverage increased from 8% to 73%.

See more: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91vrHrcVJ_w

In the process, he debunks mainstream economists' lies that AI will definitely increase wages, and explains how the Industrial Revolution in Europe (the classic example for how technology improves living standards), actually:

• didn't increase living standards in Europe for 200 years until after WW2 (and even then only due to militant labor organizing)
• required colonialism and imperialism abroad in the Global South, reducing their living standards until even today

I've found Gary's Economics to be an amazing stepping-stone channel to introduce liberals to leftist economics. He basically uses Marxist economics but never explicitly says so, making his points very palatable to libs.

This video is a great application of Domenico Losurdo's and Gabriel Rockhill's contrast of Western imperial Marxism versus Eastern Marxism Leninism, using their differing analyses of China as a case study.

I have not seen a good explanation on this from Americans, who usually peddle the brainless "they hate our freedom" line. Lemmygrad is also sorely lacking any good discussions on this topic.

The U.S. funded the mujahideen to drain Soviet resources in Afghanistan. This makes it rather strange that after the Soviet Union collapsed, Al-Qaeda (one of the factions in the mujahideen) would turn around and bite the hand that fed them.

Was Al-Qaeda dissatisfied with some aspect of U.S. treatment toward them and expected the 9/11 attacks to change that? Or did the U.S. and Israel tacitly allow or even encourage the attacks to provide an excuse to dominate the Middle East?

I would love more sources and reading on this that aren't just pro-US-empire propaganda!

Western media, especially BBC and NYT, always apply gray filters to photos in China and Russia.

This article by NYT has several side-by-side photos of China versus the USA that make the gray filter especially obvious.

Notice how the plants in China are all gray, while the US plants next to oil wells are somehow green and normal:

Most obvious gray filter:

This last image of solar panels in Shanxi is hilarious. Apparently plants in China have evolved to be black instead of green:

It seems the NYT photographer in China forgot how to color grade photos, but magically remembers once they fly back to the USA.

The article itself just laments about the sorry state of US renewables compared to China, which is building solar and wind at breakneck speed.

Scroll down to see my comments documenting other cases of this visual propaganda.

Chinese automotive glass company Fuyao builds a brand-new factory in Ohio employing 3000 Americans.

WSJ then writes a smear piece crying about the new factory outcompeting an 80-year-old nearby plant employing 250 workers (which is actually owned by a Mexican company, but they only say that at the end of the article to made their smear seem stronger). WSJ complains that China is somehow "hollowing out American manufacturing" by BUILDING FACTORIES IN AMERICA, EMPLOYING AMERICANS, and COMPETING IN AMERICA.

Ohio senator Bernie Moreno now want the US government to force Fuyao to sell its factory and lose out on its investment.

The USA previously stole a solar panel factory built in the US by Chinese solar giant Trina Solar by threatening to pass the bill "American Tax Dollars for American Solar Manufacturing Act", which would deny any solar tax credits to Chinese-run solar plants in the USA. As a result, Trina was forced to sell to American company Freyr (now rebranded T1 Energy). ^[https://x.com/RnaudBertrand/status/1985870993118937221] T1 Energy now has the gall to brag about how advanced "their" new plant is. ^[https://x.com/T1_Energy/status/1985420138058023011]

Even if China builds factories in the USA, they're somehow not doing it the right way. Apparently China is just supposed to build factories in the USA and give them away for free or something. This is some damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don't type-shit.

Obligatory Parenti quote:

“In the United States, for over a hundred years, the ruling interests tirelessly propagated anticommunism among the populace, until it became more like a religious orthodoxy than a political analysis. During the cold war, the anticommunist ideological framework could transform any data about existing communist societies into hostile evidence. If the Soviets refused to negotiate a point, they were intransigent and belligerent; if they appeared willing to make concessions, this was but a skillful ploy to put us off our guard. By opposing arms limitations, they would have demonstrated their aggressive intent; but when in fact they supported most armament treaties, it was because they were mendacious and manipulative. If the churches in the USSR were empty, this demonstrated that religion was suppressed; but if the churches were full, this meant the people were rejecting the regime’s atheistic ideology. If the workers went on strike (as happened on infrequent occasions), this was evidence of their alienation from the collectivist system; if they didn’t go on strike, this was because they were intimidated and lacked freedom. A scarcity of consumer goods demonstrated the failure of the economic system; an improvement in consumer supplies meant only that the leaders were attempting to placate a restive population and so maintain a firmer hold over them.

“If communists in the United States played an important role struggling for the rights of workers, the poor, African-Americans, women, and others, this was only their guileful way of gathering support among disenfranchised groups and gaining power for themselves. How one gained power by fighting for the rights of powerless groups was never explained. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the entire political spectrum.”

— Michael Parenti, Blackshirts and Reds; Rational Fascism & the Overthrow of Communism, pp. 41-42