I mean second there absolutely is not news... donno what rule 1 is, but this doesn't seem that crazy
Kan jo starte å kutte henne da, og få tilbakebetalt utdanning, subsidiering o.l. som hu fikk før vi kan kutte noe annet
"This is true, and this is false - source: me?"
The paper doesn't seem to be credited? Anyways, ideology is inherently fictional as it is an ideal, not reality. It's theories on how a society could function.
If Soulism is not a theory on how society could function then is it not just a description of how a society functions?
It feels as if this is an argument that soulism is "better" but if so then it's trying to compete in fields ideology is not attempting to compete
Isn't that the point? 🤔
Honey. The whole point is that tankies supporting sending tanks against the working class. If your "solidarity" is supporting authoritarian regimes that surpress and kill people then you need to realize your only solidarity is with the people in power. Not the working class
To add to the tankie discussion
I'd like to support the explanation of tankie, but keep the wording. It's been around for a reason - being that it's far easier to self-regulate and keeping "authoritarian socialists" out.
The reason we should keep tankie is for education. States using tanks against it's citizens are not cool. I myself learned a lot about authoritarianism after encountering the word initially.
Tankie is misused, but easily explained as to what it actually is, and I have shown people to wikipedia, not much harder than that.
196 has a long history of having no tankie rule, from reddit to lemmy. And I honestly think it's important to keep it.
Tbh confused how you even managed to burn the coffe with this, as it is just evaporating water that filters through the coffee above - like did you put the coffee in the bottom part? 🤔
The Iranian F-14, I shudder to think of how tired those airframes are 😰
trans ppl older than Mqrx tho~ 🔥🔥🔥
So in the case of well meaning laws and judicial systems, there is a protection from harm in the system.
Problem is, that still isn't a good way of protecting from harm, and more about getting money for harm already done. (as exampled in the article.)
If your ex is abusing you and you don't know their legal name, then it shouldn't matter. You know their name - you know to tell people. and if you're thinking of suing them, I imagine a few steps before that would be informing the people in your community.
I don't know a perfect solution to stop abuse, or similar things, but not knowing legal names, is not going to make an actual difference.
Guess the US caught up to France... somehow I'd be even more scared of the world if they take up the french nuclear doctrine as well
/thingsthathappened