BrainInABox

joined 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Looks like you are having cognitive dissonance.

I see we're breaking out the big book of meaningless redditor buzzwords.

How has the Nordics been more neoliberal? They still tax billionaires.

"Neoliberalism is when no tax billionaires"

They enjoy high standard of living and little wealth inequality.

And both metrics are moving in the wrong direction.

These are the balance that neither the US nor USSR could achieve

???

Show your working.

Which contradict your initial claims that Nordics are becoming more right.

No... They literally support it.

You claimed that throughout history, there has been international laws and standards

No, that was you.

I asked you what they are and gave me a non-response to a previous statement that does not have to do with what I asked or my point.

No, I gave you an answer that you didn't like, so you are now having to childishly pretend I didn't.

Just because a word is too big for you, doesn’t mean you can make accusations on a mirror.

You should go back to Reddit, you'll be happier there.

You did not even address when i asked you as to how the Nordics benefit from American imperialism when you said they do.

I literally did actually. So, given that you're now electing to not read what I said and then pretend I didn't say it, I'm not going to read anything more you say until you go back and address what I factually did say

I'll also point out that it really is damning of the viability of your position that you have to resort to deliberate and obvious dishonesty to defend it. What even is the point of holding a position that you yourself don't think is seriously defendable?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (10 children)

Oh ok, so you think Trump doesn't go far enough and that he should be executing naturalised citizens for being foreign.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Oh, so you were lying when you complained about .ml being simplistic?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Why? They've basically adopted most of the MAGA movements ideology, just with the parties switched and a different foreign scapegoat.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (8 children)

Yup, looks like I was correct; you are going to keep doing it anyway, while desperately projecting your own failure onto others.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

Oh, you literally are saying naturalised citizens are foreigners.

You must be a big fan of Trump's deportations.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (15 children)

It's here in this very thread

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (31 children)

Rupert Murdoch and Elon Musk are both American citizens. I see that blueMAGA has reached the same point as their red counterparts in thinking that even naturalised citizens are foreigners.

But yes, anything to avoid accepting Americas problems could have domestic origins.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (33 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Ah, so you only dislike it when other people are simplistic.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

So it's not working then?

But I assume you're going to keep doing it anyway. All while continuing to accuse other people of being short sited with no sense of praxis.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What exactly does "should" mean in this context? Either it does it it doesn't, and saying it "should" just sounds like saying reality is wrong for not conforming to your economic theory.

view more: ‹ prev next ›