I can’t connect them to anything I’ve heard off the top of my head.
Funny you should say that. They want you to hear what they want you to hear. At least not presented as front page news. Why does the US occupy Syria and have control of its oil fields? Because it is a weak country, and the US can do those things because it is a powerful country. Don't say it is because of terrorism, because of the irony. This is just one example of a pattern.
Is there a racist under your bed?
Are you saying I am lying?
The biggest states in population usually attract the most immigrants, yes.
The US accuses everybody of being a Russian ally. Donald Trump is a Russian ally isn't he, and he is your next president? I guess it is time to move out, because he is going to open the gates to the Russians to invade America. Accusing everybody of being a traitor and an Russian ally is US propaganda that lacks any semblance of objectivity. Why is the US in Syria? Is Syria a national security threat? I block such propaganda. This is such low common denominator news byte statement, it lacks any intelligence. See ya.
Time presents an anecdote as an epidemic. Trump won the electoral and popular vote. Trump haters are a fringe group. To quote Jeebus: "Do you think I have come to bring peace on the earth? No, I tell you, not peace, but division! For from now on, there will be five people divided against each other in one house, three against two, and two against three. It is going to be father against son, and son against father, and mother against daughter, and daughter against mother; mother-in-law against her daughter-in-law, and daughter-in-law against mother-in-law!"
Apparently, you think needy people are good people. As I already said, that is not true. The person can be needy because he is lazy, antisocial, and materialistic. Your definition of good is very loose and only seems significant in terms of classism. Why are needy people good is the question you must answer because that is what you implied. So explain, why are needy people, or poor people good? You made the claim, it is up to you to make the point why that is. My point is, not all people are good, but you are implying all needy people are good.
You should help good people. Just because you are needy does not make you a good person. The problem with Christianity is that it helps the needy, and expect no reciprocity. You know in India, if you give them stuff, and help them out, they think you are an inferior class, a servant. It is a matter of interpretation. A lot of these people from these countries are used to expecting things from people, that it is taking advantage. It is that mentality that is part of the psyche that forms corruption in their country of origin. The problem with the immigration laws is that anybody who lives in a poor country can justify leaving their country and go straight for America, because the pay is better and there are actually jobs. Indeed, many do exactly that.
The point of Nietzsche is that the death of Christianity meant that there is no longer any truth. Or universal truth. The Christian religion talks about universal truth, because it is self-evident. No god, means there is no truth, instead we create our own truths, or follow a truth among many. He did veer off into a distinct system until he realized that wasn't his main point. The point is, is to create a new universal truth, however, you create it. He had a disdain for contemporary atheist, even atheist today, who cling to morals attached to an extinct truth. Therefore, no rational, or coherent basis. They make an argument with literally no argument. In a way, he predicted a world after the death of Christianity of having no order, and people cling to movements such as fascism, communism, humanism, liberalism, etc.
You have your religion and I have my religion. I block left wing propaganda.
You mean like Israel has leaders that are wanted by the ICC, and the US supports, and funds their government? FYI, the ICC is the International Criminal Court. How is it that the US can fund and support a leader who is accused of war crimes by international institutions? Where are the sanctions against these leaders? Calling people with facts unhinged shows you have a condescending attitude. It is a mark of your character. You think you can win an argument by exuding superiority, and yelling louder. Facts show the true state of things. I don't bother with such people.