top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 243 points 2 years ago* (15 children)

He's Schrödinger's Brandon: Too strong and too weak at the same time. I wonder if there is an ideology that typically uses this tactic to define an opponent?

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Not sure if this is sarcastic, so for thise who don't know: It's a common tatic of fascists.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Same as it ever was. The Nazis did the same thing with the groups they scapegoated, simultaneously an incompetent drain/liability and and a hyper-competent threat that cannot be ignored.

    Critical thinking and reasoning must be taught, without that, people will follow their feelings anywhere, and those are easy to manipulate.

    Starving public education into complete and utter ruins for half a century to cut rich sociopath's taxes, and the rise of tens of millions of proudly counterfactual, willfully ignorant nitwits as a political force is not a coincidence.

    Garbage in (refusing to pay to educate kids to critically scrutinize the information they take in), garbage out (The United States of duhhhhhhhhhhh).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    The saddest part for them is, I've read about studies that say a better-educated populace is a more compassionate populace. Guess who will care for them when they are too old to care for themselves?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    The followers must feel humiliated by the ostentatious wealth and force of their enemies. When I was a boy I was taught to think of Englishmen as the five-meal people. They ate more frequently than the poor but sober Italians. Jews are rich and help each other through a secret web of mutual assistance. However, the followers must be convinced that they can overwhelm the enemies. Thus, by a continuous shifting of rhetorical focus, the enemies are at the same time too strong and too weak. Fascist governments are condemned to lose wars because they are constitutionally incapable of objectively evaluating the force of the enemy.

    Edit: I guess I can’t bold in a quoted passage, so here it is: Thus, by a continuous shifting of rhetorical focus, the enemies are at the same time too strong and too weak.

    Umberto Eco

    Ur Fascism

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    But my favorite piece is at the end. I remind everyone all the time and nauseum that facists are stupid:

    Fascist governments are condemned to lose wars because they are constitutionally incapable of objectively evaluating the force of the enemy.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 147 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    The comments from the article were surprisingly not bad. One made a good point:

    The POTUS started his SotU speech with:

    “Now it is we who face an unprecedented moment in the history of the Union. And yes, my purpose tonight is to both wake up this Congress, and alert the American people that this is no ordinary moment either. Not since President Lincoln and the Civil War have freedom and democracy been under assault here at home as they are today.”

    I have watched a lot of state of the union addresses and I cannot remember one that began with this stark of warning.

    Yet, all the articles being posted are about MTG and whether Biden looked/didn’t look old and who clapped and who didn’t.

    That’s a 5-alarm fire bell he just rang, broadcasted out to the entire country and world, pay attention to what’s important

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    People forget that the point of the speech is right in the title. It's not about the health of the country or political ideals.

    Once a year, the President delivers a speech on the stste of the union. It's about how divided the country is and whether or not that division is a threat to the nation.

    If the country went full-fascist without a struggle that wouldn't threaten the Union. If the Republicans were voted out of existence and we became a socialist utopia that wouldn't threaten the union.

    What is happening now, with one party increasingly refusing to work with the other side and intentionally breaking the systems that make government work? Yeah - that's a threat to the Union.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [+] 126 points 2 years ago* (last edited 7 months ago)
    [–] 109 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    The forklift moving the goalposts just broke the sound barrier.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 94 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Ah, those times when reality reads like an onion article.

    Fox News was ready to criticize Biden about his energy levels - they realized sleepy Joe wouldn't land so they had to pivot. This is honestly feeling like 1984 satire, I expect to see footage from rallies were Trump supporters are quoted as saying "Biden is so angry and sporadic, I'm voting for Trump because he's much more calm and composed" and the one guy that didn't get the memo that they've always been at war with East Asia will hold up a "Sleepy Joe" sign before being shunned and photoshopped out of the rally.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 63 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 59 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Republicans will complain about literally anything to make anyone who opposes them look worse.

    We should only listen to Republicans in order to decipher (it ain't hard, they aren't subtle) what new atrocities they are going to be attempting next.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 58 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The “he was too partisan” comments annoyed the shit out of me. Republicans are nothing if not hypocritical snowflakes.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 37 points 2 years ago
    [–] 29 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    "JOE BIDEN IS TOO (insert current thing Joe has done well)"

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 29 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Republican media has convinced their viewers that Biden is basically constantly confused and just slackjawed and drooling constantly. They set expectations for him so low, when reality didn't bare out their caracicture they had to pivot. I think the implication they are going for is Biden was dosed with something to make him seem coherent, basically the weekend at Bernie's president. Dumb, but so are Fox News viewers, so I'm sure it'll go over just fine with them.

    That said, it did seem like Biden was yelling a lot. The few moments where he slowed down to talk about some somber topic came as a relief to me. To put a metric to it, I saw in Politico that the written version of his speech contained 80 more explanation marks than last year's speech.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 22 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Fucking Goldilocks over here.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] [S] 22 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    Gotta love these idiots' logic.

    GOP: "SLEEPY JOE!!!"

    Dems inject him with Adderall or whatever juice to get him going.

    GOP: "HE'S TOO POWERFUL!!!"

    Biden: "muahahaha!"

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago
    [–] 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I finally just watched it, and especially paid attention to verbal missteps that people are talking about ……

    ….. I saw lots and took way too long to realize YouTube search had given me the 2022 state of the union. Oops

    ….. back on track with the current one, and the President was on fire. So much livelier and more expressive than two years ago! Definitely kicked ass and laid to rest the idea that he is too old

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago

    It's wrong for someone to talk quickly trying to destroy people with facts and logic! No President should be allowed allowed to angrily yell at a crowd in a long speech! I need to watch Ben Shapiro and Trump for hours now because I'm so angry about these things Biden did!

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    Remember 2004? Howard Dean caught hell for getting too excited then they criticized John Kerry for not being exciting enough

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›