this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024
148 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

34690 readers
138 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/12896912

As the EU’s new flagship tech laws, the Digital Services Act and the Digital Markets Act, are coming into full application, Big Tech is working hard to shoot them down. As of today, the Digital Markets Act (DMA) becomes fully applicable, following its counterpart the Digital Services Act (DSA) on 17 February.

However, as the EU’s new tech laws are coming into full application, tech corporations like Apple, Amazon, Meta and TikTok are already undermining them at every turn. To subvert these new regulations, tech corporations have filed a number of lawsuits against the European Commission and attempted to weaken the rules with malicious compliance that protects their profits at the expense of their users.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 31 points 7 months ago

The EU better start dropping the hammer or this pathetic cat and mouse game of malicious compliance will continue.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Don't buy from Apple|Google|Meta|Amazon|...
Don't be part of the problem.

Show up to the polls and vote for parties that wants to reign these criminals in.

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

And pray that the candidates elected on those platforms don't backtrack for the lobby of big-whatever.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There's only so much you can do in a representative democracy. A liquid/delegative democracy could be better, but until then, we use the tools we are given.

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

How about demanding better tools?

Can a democracy that doesn't reflect and can't act systematically for the needs of the people really be called a democracy?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

What good are demands if there's no power behind the demands. I can demand you stop using the internet, but I have no way to enforce it.

We do need better tools, but we need to agree upon what those tools are.

Can a democracy that doesn’t reflect and can’t act systematically for the needs of the people really be called a democracy?

Of course it can. Just because you don't like the way a system is run doesn't mean it isn't what it is. There many forms of democracy (delegative, representative, direct, and all their subforms constitutional monarchy, parliamentary, ...).

Which democracy is the best for the people is of course very debatable. A direct democracy wouldn't make sense in a country with a small elite and large uneducated population for example. The elite could easily influence the rest of the population in many ways: political messages, paid mercenaries, bad worker laws that make it impossible to have time to vote, flooding the system with calls for votes, proposing changes that are bad for the population but incomprehensible to them, ...

It's not easy.

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Let them try. They can probably delay it for maybe a year, but they absolutely will get fined 10% of global revenue.

Would also be nice if some of them started to suck so much on purpose, that other tech companies would gain traction.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Not so sure, to be fair Apple is in compliance with everything right now :)

What Apple did isn't illegal as per DMA, they carefully studied the requirements and made sure they were in compliance without losing control. There's no law breaking here, there's simply a poorly written DMA. Now the right question to ask is: was the DMA poorly written by mistake or... did Apple and others made sure it was written the way it is?