this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
589 points (100.0% liked)

196

16552 readers
1628 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

This sucks … seems that he can’t handle this

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

This is going to achieve Elon's goal but not for the reasons he thinks. It's going to continue making the site not worth scraping, no matter what the limits are. Rofl.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Twitter is no longer free. Lol seems like a bad idea.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Real talk, at this point it really just seems like a conscious effort at destroying the platform. Musk is definitely a fucking idiot, but there's no way even someone as unintelligent as he is would think this is a remotely "good" way to run a social media website.

I'm convinced now his goal was always to just destroy Twitter.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Honestly, I'm not convinced. I think he's just really that dumb. I showed it to someone else who works in IT and their reaction was that it sounded like a lot of management they've worked with: people who have no idea under god how anything works and refuse to listen to why their idea is functionally terrible. Even if you swear up and down it will ruin the entire product, they want it done now, because they want it.

That seems perfectly in line with the kind of moron I've heard he is.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I think you're dead on. Elon is trying to make Twitter work, but he doesn't understand it at all. He doesn't understand what they're commodifying, who their customers are, or why people use Twitter in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Oops I destroyed one of the most media integrated forms of free speech. Dang what a mistake on my part.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can someone explain what is up with the constant "rule" thing in titles with people on this instance?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's because it's an r/196 reboot.

r/196 used to be a subreddit with only one rule: that if you visited the subreddit, you had to post something before you left. Didn't matter what it was, but it's why their reiterations in the fediverse seem to much more active than anywhere else.

Whether adding "rule" to the title was a part of it, idk, but I think that part's just a meme habit

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This is off topic for this post but the community 196 has a rule that if you visit it you must post. Thus the posts with the title "rule".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I reckon this is because of AI datasets, same with reddit. Suddenly having millions of authentic conversations logged is very valuble to companies training Large Laungage Models and the last thing these people want is that value being taken from them.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›