this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
112 points (81.8% liked)

Memes

3975 readers
129 users here now

Good memes, bad memes, unite towards a united front.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

LMAO at all the liberals from lemmy.world already upset at this meme in the comment section, just an hour after it was posted

Cope and seethe

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

the reddit exodus and its consequences

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago

This community got hijacked by liberals 😔

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

Democrats will fight the hardest they have ever fought to avoid giving up their position as the polite, norms-respecting Republicans.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (7 children)

anarchists will claim to not be liberals but get so upset and mass-downvote us when we critique liberal parties kekw

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bit of a strawman there. I'm an anarchist and I'll happily upvote any dunks on the shitlibs.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

No offense to you or some of the other better anarchists I’ve seen, but it’s not really a strawman when a sizable portion of people who call themselves anarchists spend all their time punching left and supporting dems or calling for the abolition of literacy and bedtimes.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

You know what’s not cool, Jordan? Crying everytime someone says Marxist

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (37 children)

Just saw which instance this was. Apologies, I'll take my anarchist self elsewhere.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Respect. Although I’m curious what problem you as an anarchist would have with calling democrats blue maga lol

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Oh, they're absolutely shit (even the furthest left of them) but, the system is rigged with FPTP and other "features" to give us either a neoliberal party or a fascist party. Neither is a good choice though I find equating them to be a false equivalency. My personal ethics require that I take what action that I can to reduce harm, especially to those must vulnerable and historically oppressed. Data shows anti-electoralism and third parties in FPTP to be functionally equivalent to voting for fascists, so, garbage neoliberals who at least aren't trying to string up trans people while robbing the working class is my option.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I agree, although I would also argue that in the specific case of the US, the situation is a bit more drastic since in most (specially oppressed countries) the liberals/moderate fascists/national bourgeoisie have a somewhat "revolutionary" role since they generally oppose the international bourgeoisie and do win some concessions for the working class, as you mention, or help with industrialisation and so on. In the case of the US, though, both parties represent the international bourgeoisie, and the international political agenda of both countries is essentially the same, interventionism, imperialism, economic blockades, and so on, so the difference is radically different in that the number of concessions the liberals/moderate fascists can give the working class, specially the working class of oppressed countries, is much smaller than in other places. I too critically support the left wing liberals in my country because the option is total deindustrialisation and selling everything to the lowest bidder otherwise, so I totally get your point but wanted to make a small distinction.

By the way, I don't know if you've heard of Hexbear, they're a pan-leftists instance who will be federating with us and a couple of other instances by the end of the month luckily, they have a pretty active anarchist community so you might have a better time there than on a general purpose liberal instance.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Definitely agreed and thank you for the solid discourse. My contention is that nominal support of a liberal/moderate international bourgeoise still tends towards reduction of harm, compared to fascists. They still practice imperialism and exploitation but tend to do so when softer gloves more frequently by compare. Additionally, their constituents tend to be more likely to urge further harm reduction, when they are unable to remain ignorant of it. My loyalties being to those groups that have been, from my perspective, most harmed throughout recorded human (indigenous peoples, minorities, and general non-combatants), I still have to make that choice in the artificial binary.

My ideal societal organization (mostly in-line with anachro-syndicalism) is something that I hold no illusion of being achievable in my lifetime, if it ever is, at least not without unacceptable suffering and loss of life (nor do I pretend that my non-violent path is the only one necessary to achieve positive change - the labor and civil rights movements being excellent examples contrary). So, I do what is within my means and abilities to corrode these systems by cultivating curiosity and kindness while mitigating harms in hope that this continues our species' social and psychological evolution towards something compatible with my ideals.

Thank you for recommending Hexbear! I hope that they federate with my home instance as well, which seems to skew more towards anarchism, in my experience, but is more topically aligned with free and open knowledge and creativity.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

I need to make a bot to post this any time fascism gets mentioned.


The western left’s use of the term fascism, is borderline white-supremacist at this point. Fascism was a form of colonialism that died by the 1940s, and is only allowed to be demonized in public discourse, because it was a form of colonialism directed also against white europeans. It was defeated, and Germany / Italy / Japan reverted to the more stable form of government for colonialism (practiced by the US, UK, France, the Netherlands, Australia, etc): bourgeois parliamentarism.

British, european, and now US colonizers were doing the exact same thing, and killing far more people for hundreds of years in the global south, yet you don’t hear ppl scared of their countries potentially "adopting parliamentary democracy”. They haven't changed, and their wealth is still propped up by surplus value theft from the super-exploitation of hundreds of millions of low-paid global south proletarians.

This is why you have new leftists terrified that the UK or US or europe “might turn fascist!!”, betraying that the atrocities propagated by those empires against the global south was and is completely acceptable.

Make no mistake about it: parliamentary / bourgeois democracy is not only a more stable form of government, it's also far more effective at carrying out colonialism, and killing millions of innocent people.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

Thank you for this. The historical and current colonial exploitation of the global South and indigenous peoples around the globe is absolutely something that is overlooked far too much in these conversations. A large part of this, I suspect is due to controlling narratives allowed in education and subverting factual accounts and analyses. A good recent example being the portrayal of The Troubles in Northern Ireland as a sectarian conflict.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

Hexbear's a good and active left unity instance

load more comments (35 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›