this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2024
58 points (96.8% liked)

Quark's

1223 readers
1 users here now

Come to Quark’s, Quark’s is Fun!

General off-topic chat for the crew of startrek.website. Trek-adjacent discussions, other sci-fi television, navigating the Fediverse, server meta (within reason), selling expired cases of Yamok sauce, it’s all fair game.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Squibbles@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There seems to be an error in the thumbnail. That's the back of Darth vaders head.

[–] SevenOfWine@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fediverse bug. I see the correct thumbnail, but have seen the wrong thumbnail on other posts when using a kbin account.

[–] Jaccident@startrek.website 4 points 1 year ago

I believe this was a joke, about how this moon looks like a shaved scrotum that’s been savaged by a ferret.

[–] FishLake@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Typo in title. ‘Inhabitable’ means it’s suitable for life, which is not what the study says. You meant to say ‘uninhabitable’.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Who knew inflammable meant flammable! (thanks, I fixed the title)

[–] SevenOfWine@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago

Article:

“It’s on the lower end of what we would expect,” said Jamey Szalay, a plasma physicist at Princeton University who led the study. But “it’s not totally prohibitive” for habitability, he added. ... “We don’t really know how much oxygen you need to make life,” she said. “So the fact that it’s lower than some earlier, wishful-thinking estimates is not such a problem.”