381
Confusing perspective (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 211 points 1 year ago

It's easier to see what it is once you see the whole scenery. It's a really clever framing, 10/10

[-] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago

Also colour saturation put to the max.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

Not necessarily, just different lighting. OP looks like it was taken with low-angle full sunlight.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

This all sounds a bit overly complex, have we 100% ruled out witchcraft?

[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

Oh, so that's a textured wall, and not the horizon/sky

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

Thank you for unfucking my brain.

[-] [email protected] 100 points 1 year ago

I like this style, just don't know what it's called.

[-] [email protected] 63 points 1 year ago

I can't speak for the photography style, but that style of using walls of ice in a composition is called "impossible in 30 years"

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Haha! Oh, now I’m sad. :(

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Me too, buddy. Me too. :(

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

That's very optimistic of you to think humans will be around to have names for such things in 30 years.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Ah, sorry. Is "anti-hot apartment tower made from solid aqua cola and lacking residents" better?

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

A tetraptych or pseudo-tetraptych maybe? Closest concept I can think of.

[-] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago

The upper right quadrant is a terracotta wall that goes right up to the water. Below that in the photo is the reflexion of the wall. The left half is just normal water with no reflexion.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's a really interesting composition. I'm not a fan of these kinds of things being called "unaltered"/"unedited", because after a bit of searching I can't find any evidence of that. But it certainly is not a composite.

If it's shot on film, it's possible the saturation is natural, but I can't find metadata anywhere.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

The bottom right is a reflection on the water of the wall at the top right.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

You must bend the spoon.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Man-made structure in the top right

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Aaaaaaah ok

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

was anyone else able to see the pic for what it is and then left confused looking for why it’s supposed to be confusing

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Somebody please explain

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yep. It's literally cropped from the original and impossible to argue it's unaltered

this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2024
381 points (97.3% liked)

Damn, that's interesting!

5454 readers
1 users here now

  1. No clickbait
  2. No Racism and Hate speech
  3. No Imgur Gallery Links
  4. No Infographics
  5. Moderator Discretion
  6. Repost Guidelines
  7. No videos over 15 minutes long
  8. No "Photoshopped" posts
  9. Image w/ text posts must be sourced in comments

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS