If the leaks and rumors are true, Beijing stands ready to launch a new and radical solution to the economy’s property crisis – a government takeover. What the authorities refer to as “a new model” would replace the old emphasis on ownership with more rentals and use government funds to buy up bankrupt properties so that in time the government’s role in real estate would rise from 5% of the market at present to 30%. Such an act would surely take the nation back to its communist roots if not quite the days of Mao Zedong. If it would veil the property crisis for a time, it would in the long run do tremendous damage to China’s economic prospects.

xi-peel

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [S] 103 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Beijing’s ability to manage real estate also comes into question after considering how poorly the authorities have managed things to date. Prior to 2020, Beijing actively encouraged residential real estate development, pushing local authorities to get involved and ensuring easy credit terms for both developers and homebuyers. Private builders and speculators responded actively, taking on debt and pursuing increasingly dubious projects so that even as China was meeting its housing needs, such development reached the astronomical level of some 30% of China’s economy. Then in 2020, Beijing abruptly removed all this support. Not surprisingly, the highly leveraged and extended developers began failing almost immediately.

xi-lib-tears oh no! not the speculators! it would be a real shame if a bunch of capitalists lost tons of money and all we got out of it was all this housing that now we can buy up for cheap!

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 81 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Since US prices are so high, they were salivating at a Chinese housing crisis. That way they could enter the Chinese market and buy up properties for cheap. But since the government is going to buy up the cheap homes, they can't enter the market. So now comes the propaganda tantrum about how there's no way this will work, it's evil, it's authoritarian.

    Problem is that shit only works on Americans. Appealing to Chinese people's sens of individualistic English property rights doesn't really work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 53 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    you nailed it

    also forbes about u.s. commercial real estate:

    Finally, while it will be a tough year or two for the commercial real estate community, I expect the amount of capital on the sidelines will open up the market and create once-in-a-lifetime opportunities. As the old adage goes in real estate, "It is not the first or second but the third owner who makes money on a project." The opportunities will be plentiful, but the buyers will have to view the assets through a new lens.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    Since US prices are so high, they were salivating at a Chinese housing crisis. That way they could enter the Chinese market and buy up properties for cheap. But since the government is going to buy up the cheap homes, they can't enter the market.

    Incompetent Chinese property developer: "I consent!"

    Soulless American hedge fund: "I consent!"

    The Communist Party of China: "Was there somebody you forgot to ask?"

    The myth of consensual market entry.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 47 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Prior to 2020, Beijing actively encouraged residential real estate development. . . [Developers persued] increasingly dubious projects so that even as China was meeting its housing needs. . . Then in 2020, Beijing abruptly removed all this support.

    So they funded housing development until there were plenty of houses at which point they stopped funding more development and this is bad for some reason? What did they want them to do, continue encouraging development when there wasn't a need for it solely to prop up the investors?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    If they had done that, then we could get more of the stories about the ghost cities that are the harbinger of China's imminent collapse. I've been reading those articles for decades. They've kept a lot of journalists busy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago

    Imagine taking a city’s population growth chart, extrapolating the data out 5 years, and including the projected need to housing in your 5 year plan. These damn commies are way too prepared for predictable trends. Suspicious.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 36 points 2 years ago*

    gives capitalists the money and leniency to build a bunch of housing

    abruptly yoinks it from them after they’re built and tell them to fuck off

    subsidize the housing so people can live in it

    suswcc problem?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 81 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    If the leaks and rumors are true, Beijing stands ready to launch a new and radical solution to the economy’s property crisis – a government takeover.

    Leaks and rumours?

    Isn't it what they said they would do ages ago?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 2 years ago

    No but see we can't trust anything China's government says it's going to do even though it has a long and storied history of doing literally exactly what it says it's going to do because ... reasons? I guess? So we can only trust anonymous sources instead.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 76 points 2 years ago

    xigma-male There is no 'property crisis', its made up by the market.

    When 2008 housing bubble burst, the problem wasn't that the homes magically vanished, the homes remained, taken over by ghouls and leaving the individuals with debt which wasn't wiped off clean.

  • source
  • [–] 72 points 2 years ago

    did-someone Oh, did someone get addicted to property speculation?

  • source
  • [–] 70 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    This dude has written at least 9 China bad articles in the last month.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

    getting some of this probably. wonder if a FOIA would be able to find out where it all goes

    (a) Countering Chinese influence fund. —There is authorized to be appropriated $300,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 through 2025 for the Countering Chinese Influence Fund to counter the malign influence of the Chinese Communist Party globally. Amounts appropriated pursuant to this authorization are authorized to remain available until expended and shall supplement, not supplant, amounts otherwise authorized to be appropriated to counter such influence.

    EDIT: apparently this money passed the senate but never actually became law. my apologies

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [+] 69 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 59 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It has happened before.

    It is happening now.

    It will happen again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It will happen again.

    some-controversy what if it didn't need to?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Ok but what if he pressed the communism button? xi-plz

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    Tapping the sign

    According to Marx's theory of historical materialism, societies pass through six stages — primitive communism, slave society, feudalism, capitalism, socialism and finally global, stateless communism.

    Don't hold your breath

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 61 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Lmao I thought the title was just the OP dunking on Forbes, but it's the actual article title, this is beyond parody

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    use government funds to buy up bankrupt properties so that in time the government’s role in real estate would rise from 5% of the market at present to 30%

    We should let unused, bankrupt property be repo’d by banks so they can use it to gamble on doge coin

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 53 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    This is my dream result for the YIMBY movement. Dense infill housing built in all cities and then immediately expropriated.

    Also it's very funny that 30% publicly-owned housing is communist when I'm pretty sure Singapore has a much higher percentage.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago

    Yeah I think the "free" capitalist Singapore has like 78% of their population living in public housing...yet you don't see these fascists fearmongering about how Singapore is "foolish" and "communist" for doing so.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 53 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Lmao, what "crisis"? That there's a surplus of housing and people are easily able to afford to live? This is what only being able to see things through the lens of profit does to a mf.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    This is journalism? With these writing standards you may as well hire a sixteen year-old for $7.25 an hour.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 44 points 2 years ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 43 points 2 years ago

    it would in the long run do tremendous damage to China’s economic prospects.

    Says the people who's advice leads to less than half the economic growth that China has on off-years.

  • source
  • [–] 37 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    A big step in the right direction, but let's be real, this is basically just Keynesianism

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago

    Liberals critiquing Marxism: “Fear not, for Don Quixote has come to relieve you of your delusions! Those aren’t windmills you’re seeing, you utter fucking morons, they’re giants! Wake up sheeple!”

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 2 years ago

    They can't keep getting away with being COMMUNISTS!

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    So glad they could tell us what to think of China's plans (foolish) rather than just do their damn jobs and just report the damn news and save their opinions for their damn blog.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago

    think-about-it If you have the resources you can decide to just build houses and cut out the speculators. Also, power comes from the barrel of a gun.

  • source
  • When Forbes accidentally gives Xi leftist street cred.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago

    the maoist uprising against the landlords was the largest and most comprehensive proletarian revolution in history, and led to almost totally-equal redistribution of land among the peasantry

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›