top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 289 points 3 years ago (25 children)

twitter blue subscribers can now hide the entire reason they spent money on it in the first place

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 114 points 3 years ago (7 children)
  • [–] 67 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Well that sounds terrible. At least with the blue logo you can just hide or block their posts to get to the organic engagement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    yeah, seems like now it will be very difficult to weed them out... just another reason to go away from twitter

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 174 points 3 years ago (10 children)

    I fucking love how news outlets refuse to acknowledge the new name.

    I am all in on only referring to it as Twitter.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    I’ve taken to calling it “The service formerly known as Twitter.”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Nah just disrespect the whole sham.

    Call it Twitter. Call them tweets.

    Nobody calls Facebook "Meta".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 3 years ago

    People call the company that owns Facebook Meta all the time. Facebook is still called Facebook because they didn't change Facebook to Meta, they changed The Facebook Company to Meta.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [+] 105 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (6 children)
  • [–] 29 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I would assume that's because, at least partially, because there's an abundance of addons which automatically block blue checks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 25 points 3 years ago

    It wouldn't be so bad if they didn't also give them more weight in the algorithm. Any time you load a thread with more than a few comments, there's like 5 trolls on top with bullshit comments.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 79 points 3 years ago (10 children)

    So I guess now you can get your tweets pushed without disclosing that you payed for it…?

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 65 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    They were bullied too much ahahahahahah my goodness

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago

    But when you see a reply from a small account with few interactions high up under a popular post, you’re still going to know it’s a paying simp.

    It’s like putting a clown nose whilst wearing your nazi uniform. People can still see the uniform, but now they also think you’re a clown.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 55 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    This is hilarious. Thank God I never made an account on that cesspool.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    I was either on my last slide phone or my first smart phone when Twitter came out and Facebook was beginning it's ascent to late 2000s domination.

    From the beginning, I thought the concept of effectively posting text messages on this new Twitter thing made no sense at all, so I never bothered making an account.

    However many years later, I'm super glad I thought Twitter v1.0 was so silly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 47 points 3 years ago

    They can't even be proud of their decision to lick the boot. I'd call them worms but that would be an insult to the worms.

  • source
  • [–] 40 points 3 years ago (11 children)

    So.. if you can't see if someone is a "legit" (verified) account, why would you pay that fat f@ck for verifiXation?

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 39 points 3 years ago

    What snowflakes

  • source
  • [–] 35 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    All I ever see is a stream of stupidity from blue checkmarks. Let them wear that badge with shame.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Never been a Twitter - or "X" - user, but:

    Isn't it the whole point to show everyone your blue check mark that you have been approved or something like that? How else would one know that you are the real deal?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    That was the original purpose of the checkmark, but Elon took them away from everybody who didn't pay for Blue or corporate verification (and didn't have over a million followers at the time) and started giving them to everybody who paid for Blue and added a phone number.

    So now the checkmark just means they are paying for "X." Of course, I'm sure some people are now ashamed that they're paying, so they have the option to hide it now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 28 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Isn't having the mark part of the flex?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Cucked behavior if you're gonna pay Elon musk you need to wear that shame

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 25 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Imagine using Twitter after everything that's happened

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 23 points 3 years ago

    You'll still be able to identify by them by their bad posts.

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 3 years ago

    What's next, a Honda logo to hide the logo on their Tesla?

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Bet Elon wanted this because people kept blocking anyone with the blue checkmark, and the people that paid for it kept crying about being blocked.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 22 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    If you're still on Twitter, you're part of the problem.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 21 points 3 years ago

    when you are too much of a little cunt to own up to the fact that you paid money for that cocksucker.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 3 years ago

    Twitter checks are the new MAGA hats.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 3 years ago
    [–] 14 points 3 years ago (7 children)

    Now why would they want to do that, seems odd. Wouldnt they want to show they are supporting the free speech (their CEO says this is the case) platform, what would it gain you to hide this badge?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 12 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child)

    So u basically hiding something that u paid to show off in the first place (•_•)

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 10 points 3 years ago

    Hide your shame? Not sure who this appeals to.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›