top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 75 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

yeah, didn't work in brazil, we just opened up for the right to elect their dumbass just before the pandemic started, it was grim, please do vote for the lesser evil.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 67 points 2 years ago (64 children)
  • [–] 101 points 2 years ago

    That's not a counterpoint, that's just pointing out that both aren't good signals. The main difference is that not voting or voting third party makes it more likely that the guy you yourself admit you're more scared of more likely to win.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (32 replies)
    [–] 63 points 2 years ago (22 children)

    My voting strategy is super easy. You don't need to keep up with politics or policy. Just see who the KKK is voting for and then vote for the other guy.

  • source
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    As an outsider, it's really depressing to hear you only get two parties to choose from.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    We have to keep it forever though, because some dead slave owners thought up the perfect government, apparently.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (16 replies)
    [–] 55 points 2 years ago (10 children)

    Got it, should riot instead.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    You can hate all the candidates and still vote for the less shitty one.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    You can hate the concept of government in it's entirety and still vote. Even Lysander Spooner, a total anarchist, said as much in his writings. He said government is completely illegitimate, but there's nothing wrong with voting when you are forced into the system, and doing so does not imply your consent to the system. It's like a torturer asking you how you'd prefer to be tortured. It's OK to have an opinion. Over here in the USA, I'd rather suffer Sleepy Genocidal Joe than that fucking orange monster. Since we don't have ranked choice voting, I have to pick one or else I don't get any say at all, and that's exactly how the powers-that-be want it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 30 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    CGP Grey's Rules for Rulers spells out power structures in authoritarian and democratic countries really well.

    If you vote, you are saying "I can support you, or I can support the other guy, but I will support someone" whereas not voting tells politicians you are politically useless, so they won't pay any attention to your needs.

    It's a cynical way of looking at it, but if the no. 1 imperative for a politician is reelection, spending time doing things that will get you more votes is better than wasting time pleasing people who probably won't vote anyway.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 30 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    Honestly sometimes I think every country should have its own Sinn Féin of sorts. Just a party that never takes its seats. Yeah, try calling it the "same thing" when you can't pass any legislation or form coalitions or get anything done because a third of the seats in the national legislature are literally left empty on purpose. Don't like it? Well, it's your problem that your party is literally less electable than No Representation!

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 28 points 2 years ago (16 children)

    ITT: people shouting "nuh uh" at the post.

    I'm fairly convinced that Lemmy has been compromised with an inordinate amount of Russian propaganda relay bots.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • load more comments (14 replies)
    [–] 28 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    If somebody tells you not to vote, they know who you would have voted for and rather you didn't.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 25 points 2 years ago* (6 children)

    Whilst I'm not in US with it's Power Duopoly system, were I've lived I've always made a point of voting in the elections I can vote, and if none of the options appeals to me, I just vote blank.

    Abstention out of principle does get mixed with abstention out of laziness, out of disconnect from politics or simply because of not being able to go vote, but a blank vote is a statement of "I did go to the trouble of going to vote just to register my dissatisfaction with all available options".

    I've also been on the other side (manning a voting place) and I don't recommend spoiling your vote (if voting with a paper ballot) as whilst the people talling the votes will indeed see your beautiful artistic depiction of male genitalia or read your strongly worded message of disgust with the selection of candidates available, it won't go beyond them as in the tally it just gets mixed with people that incorrectly filled-in the ballot (such as multiple marks, marks significantly outside the box or, in the US, hanging chads).

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I agree with your stance, but would take it a step further.

    If one refuses to participate, rather than being unable to for what ever reason (we do realize that voter supression happens and that alone is a complicated subject that im not going to dig into for this hot take), one gives up the right to complain about politics until the next election cycle. Showing up and turning in a blank ballot is a valid protest, being loud from the side lines without putting in a minimum of effort is not.

    Although in the US where its been "the lesser of two evils" for my entire life, a blank ballot is statistically in support of the greater evil.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 25 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    Agreed, that's why the strategy of voting uncommitted and/or third party is superior.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 22 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    In France you can vote "blank" which is counted separately to absentees.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 21 points 2 years ago (51 children)

    Low turnout doesn’t change their minds it makes them think they need to either go further to the center or that Americans are too lazy

  • source
  • hideshow 51 child comments
  • load more comments (49 replies)
    [–] 21 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    If you can, please go vote. You give the vote up to the person you like the least if you don’t show up. I know this election sucks and the candidates aren’t the best. But is there someone you absolutely don’t want in office no matter what? I have one in mind and you better believe I’m showing up to vote for the only guy who can have a chance to keep him away. These other third party guys have no chance, like always. If you don’t show up to vote or vote third party as a throwaway, then don’t complain for the next four years.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 17 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    you realize this is talking about not voting in a PRIMARY, for a nomination he can't lose, right? tlaib is not suggesting that they don't vote in the general for biden. she is saying write uncommitted in the PRIMARY. personally I don't think that will pressure them enough. a large number of people denying biden a vote in the general might make them get the picture though.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 16 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    To solve this, find out how to register a protest vote and do that. Not voting is ambiguous, as is spoiling your ballot paper. What you need is a formally recognised way to vote "None of the above" or something similar, so that your intent is 100% clear.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 16 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    That is only true in the undemocratic 2 party system of the US.

    In places where they actually have multiple parties, say 10 or so at least. It is hard to not find a party that you like more than the others.

    So if someone doesn't vote, it means none of the parties are good enough. Otherwise they would vote blank. And if too many people do not vote, it sends a clear signal to the government that they need to change something fast in order to prevent an uprising.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 15 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    No, the problem isn't not voting, it's only voting, a distinction those of you who are dedicated to doing the latter refuse to acknowledge.

    It is people who look at the system and think that a tick in a box once every four years can or ever will change that system, but in actuality only maintains it, who are the ones who need to be rethinking their strategy. 🙄

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    Nobody refuses to acknowledge this. It comes up in every single one of these goddamn threads.

    There are just too many people who are a little bit lazy and think this gives them an excuse not to show up at all. A way to feel self-justified about it: well both sides are bad, so I'll go jack off some more. Downballot? I don't know what that is because I've never seen a ballot. Because I do this every election.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)
    load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 14 points 2 years ago (14 children)

    It is however easier to explain to people that those in power do not have popular support if there are less people that voted for them. I am not saying it is a good idea, but I am trying to say that this goes both ways. As some user previously said, voting for lesser of two evils and voting for absolute support is also indistinguishable.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • load more comments (14 replies)
    [–] 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    When your choices in an election are between "boring corporatists" and "100% concentrated evil" you don't have the luxury of sitting this election out with your adorable little "protest vote."

    If authoritarians win the next election, you won't have to worry about voting ever again.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 12 points 2 years ago* (8 children)

    you should be able to vote :

    1. anytime
    2. for anyone in the country that have full citizen rights
    3. electronically - privately using your private key signed and acknowledged by gov
    4. over whole period you can change your vote anytime
    5. counting votes and reset should be every 4 - 5 years depending on terms
    6. before counting votes everyone should get notification one month, one week, one day before and only if you didn't vote hour, 15 minutes before counting
    7. if you didn't vote your voting account should be disabled and removed from pool until you pay the fine to bring it back.

    that's all, let's bring the voting to 21st century lol

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›