this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
97 points (100.0% liked)

science

14694 readers
132 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I've heard that it's an impossible task. That to actual measure quantum gravity you'd need tiny masses closer than the Planck length to each other.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

No more impossible than any other precise quantum measurement. But that doesn’t have to be the goal post; indirectly making measurements, even on atoms worth of mass helps. Every time we change the setup, the mass, the temperature, the measurements, we can learn something new. Cast enough shadows from different angles and you’ll be able to model what’s casting the shadow. If you study condensed matter physics you’ll quickly learn there’s a lot to be learned and gained from indirect quantum measurements.