this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
72 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37724 readers
489 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Whelp, here we go again

(page 3) 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I get that video hosting is expensive, but I’m not sitting through the number of ads that YT wants me to.

There will be other workarounds. If those fail, then I’ll just stop watching. The platform has gotten worse over the years anyway.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Lol. Guess it's time to add the rest of my subbed channels to YT-DL and ditch their shitty ad-filled site entirely.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I canceled my YT premium this year because they raised the price of my grandfathered family plan. I mainly used it for music, but the audio quality really sucks. I switched to a CD quality music service and love it. YT just costs too much for what I get. If they increased the music quality or had a cheaper plan without the music then I'd consider it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

People should develop a federated video hosting service. It will be expensive but I know the community can do it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think this is because YouTube pushed so much its shorts (tiktok knockoff) but they're not as profitable. My guesstimate is that at least 70% of traffic is in shorts now so longer content is rarely played along with longer ads

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

In cases when viewers feel they have been falsely flagged as using an ad blocker, they can share this feedback by clicking on the link in the prompt.

Hands up if you've been through Facebook's ban appeal process and know that this, too, will consist of an automated decision to deny your appeal months after the ban would have ended anyway.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t want all the other crap that YT is offering with premium. $12/month is too much.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Not as good as not giving Google money but if you use a VPN and set your country to India or Argentina you can get premium for roughly $2/month

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The markets demand more profitability dude

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›