this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
691 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

59143 readers
2314 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 year ago (2 children)

God I love learning about analog tech! Very creative design!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

You'd love Technology Connections on YouTube if you haven't seen him already.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

It just feels so much more clever than the modern stuff, even if it's much more complicated overall now.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Funny, when I was a little kid my grandmother had a Zenith TV with that exact remote. I still remember the long throw and clank of those buttons. TV remotes were uncommon then so I thought it was the coolest thing ever. Yeah dating myself here.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My grandmother had one of these.

I somehow discovered that if I took this magnetic screwdriver, and this bent piece of coat hanger and slapped them together, her tv would turn off.

I fucked with her so much she took her tv to a repair shop because she thought it was broken.

Good times.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

I think this is hacking in its purest form. You’ve discovered a new way to do something unexpected, and you went ahead with it just because you could.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you’ve ever heard someone refer to a TV remote as a “clicker,”

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

I say this to my son sometimes. "Throw me the clicker." The first time he looked at me like WTF are you talking about. Told him it's another name for the remote, but didn't tell him why, so he still has no idea

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My grandpa had a tv store around the time, and he always told the story of him pulling someone's leg by making them believe the tv was voice activated, with that thing in his pocket. So he covered the click sound by yelling at the tv.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

I like your grandpa.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I once told my friend that my car was self driving. Little did she know I was driving with my knee.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We had one of those TVs when I was a kid... and our dog had one of those metal link collars, and when she would shake her head the TV would change channels, and the volume would change. :). I had forgotten all about that.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yep, my neighborhood friend had one. I discovered that my keys, when shook, would hit the frequencies to do stuff too. His dad was annoyed by it and I don’t know if he figured out how his TV would spontaneously change to channels

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Reminds me of getting trolled by my friend with an IR blaster on his phone. Took me way too long to catch on. Simpler times...

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Modern design is boring and ugly as hell compared to what engineers and designers were able to come up with decades back.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Modern ‘design’ is all about pushing physicality and tactility out of the way, in an attempt to focus as much of your attention into your display as possible. As a result, everything aside from your screen has been ‘pushed aside’.

I get it, I really do…but it’s all so depressingly sterile.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (7 children)

There's a great YouTube channel of this younger guy who teaches design and he makes very good videos that dissect a lot of the BS design trends. One of them is taking the old school "less is more" type of thinking into a stupid extreme. He explains that far too many designers are missing the deeper meaning in that design ethos which ends up making the user experience MORR complicated all so they could save adding an extra button to make navigating the device's interface infinitely easier.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think it also often simply boils down to cost. A cheap touch screen or capacitive button is much cheaper than adding durable buttons with a satisfying click

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Would it have been possible for the speakers of the time to emit those frequencies? Imagining the equivalent of a Twitch raid: "I'm done broadcasting so I'm going to send you to the next channel."

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Possibly. Still nott as bad as, "Alexa, order a 12pack of dildos"

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is a really neat way to pull off remote technology. I wonder if there are still any applications for this type of ultrasound remote tech.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I remember people claiming they could activate these by flexing cans.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That would make sense, flexing cans would create the ultrasonic noise the TV is listening for. Even still, I think it's a neat technology.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I think that kinda just makes it cooler. Lose the remote? Flex a can!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

That's surprisingly cool

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

"Again, it required no batteries — much desired by Zenith, as the company didn’t want customers to think a TV was broken when the battery died."

Was this really that big of a concern? Did people really think that LMAO

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Layer 8 issues occur all the time.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Its a play on the 7 layer OSI Model. Layer 8 would be the user, also known as an ID-10T (idiot) or PEBKAC (problem exists between keyboard and chair).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

In a world where remotes are scarce, I could see how this would be a concern, yes.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even today, in tech support, the issue is very often the user

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_error

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

If you're planning on selling 1 million units, a half of a percent of people making that mistake means a big headache.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Damn that's interesting, I had heard of the light control but never these

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That was incredibly interesting.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My aunt and uncle still had a TV with one of these things when I was growing up in the 90s (the 70s version). The buttons had a distinct and satisfying click to them.

There was only one volume button, and and each press would turn up the volume in 3-4 steps and then cycle around to mute. You couldn't turn the volume down without turning it up first. If you wanted more fine control you still had to get up and adjust the volume knob on the set.

I wonder what my aunt and uncle eventually did with that big old box. It belongs in a museum.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

That looks like it was so satisfying to click.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

My parents had an appliance/electronics shop when I was growing up and they took used items on trade occasionally. Someone turned in one of those zenith sets and I actually got to use that remote. Bear in mind we were well into the age of infrared remotes by this point (late 80s).

It was definitely interesting and I think I could just distinguish the difference between the sounds of the buttons.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I know this is about the tech, but OP's name is just cracking me up. Thank you @FartsWithAnAccent

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Interesting purely mechanical design. Our first remote (that didn't have a cable connection) used sound as well, but it was battery powered and as a kid, I could hear at least some of those sounds. It had way more than just 4 buttons though, maybe the mechanical design hits a limit there at some point (or electronics just got cheaper).

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought this thing was a gag at first, but that's actually really clever. I wonder if dogs would hate it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

The article does indicate that animals were sensitive to the noises:

"It did have its flaws: people found that jingling keys or coins could be picked up by the TV’s microphones and accidentally change the channel, and the high-pitch frequencies from the remote were discernible by pets."

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Quite ingenious and simple design, even considering the limitations of the time.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Old-school tech came up with some of the most elegant solutions sometimes. This is quite neat, I wonder if it could be improved upon with modern signal processing.

load more comments
view more: next ›