Over 7,000 students in Georgia with unpaid lunch balances are getting a helping hand following a $1 million initiative from the Arby's Foundation, the nonprofit announced Thursday.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 191 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • [–] 45 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Came in here just to find this comment, knowing it would be here, and upvote. Can't help but think the few down votes are just people that don't understand the reference. https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/orphan-crushing-machine

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 138 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Georgia apparently would rather put 10 year olds into debt than feed children. It's the best they can do as Christians.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 2 years ago

    It is biblical. Charity to people like Paul was freely given out of love vs welfare-taxation system we have now.

    Of course a good person who was a Christian could reason out

    "Paul was in Rome so he must have seen the free donations of food given by the emperor to the city's poor but didn't comment on it. Which meant that when he talks about charity he is talking about a supplement, yes a supplement not a first response, to actual effective large scale operations. I should be happy with both. A good government that works hard that I add too. Not a bad government I helped create and stick a bandaid on by throwing a twenty in the collection plate".

    A pity this doesn't seem to occur to them. Despite the theological wiggle room.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 105 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago

    School lunch debt is the so incredibly dystopian that I hope 20-30 years from now people will have to use an internet search to find out what it meant to people in this decade. Like it’s so unabashedly wrong as a thing, I hope we look at like when Bayer made heroin and bloodletting was in practice.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 103 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    The orphan crushing machine shall stop...for now

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 77 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Jesus Christ. Students now have debts before they even leave high school? Cool.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago

    Pretty soon it will be the norm that when you graduate high school you take your first bankruptcy and clean your slate before your life really starts to matter. Hell it's only 7 years, you got 4 years of college so only 3 more till you can start living again! Well I guess after you somehow pay off those new college loans as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 74 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Yet another dystopic horror disguised as a feel-good story.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 73 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Something something boring dystopia

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 58 points 2 years ago

    Lunch debt …

  • source
  • [–] 48 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    what the fuck is a lunch debt???

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 36 points 2 years ago

    Food is a human right..

  • source
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    "Lunch Debt" ... jesus christ

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    "Then he took the seven loaves and the fish, and when he had given thanks, he broke them and gave them to the disciples, and they in turn gave to the people. They all ate and were satisfied. Afterward, they were all given invoices and in his majestic mercy he allowed them all an extra 30 days to pay."

    Matthew 15:32

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [+] 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
    [–] 29 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    i thought American kids got free school lunches?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 65 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    There is a federal lunch subsidy program, and many states also have their own lunch programs. The program even extends through the summer.

    Several caveats.

    First, not every state participates. This is free money that states could use to feed hungry kids, and some states are just like "nah, fuck them kids."

    Second, parents generally have to apply for the program. You fill out some forms, and the kids get subsidized lunches. That's a problem, because not every parent knows the programs exist, not every parent speaks English or Spanish or another language the school might be thoughtful enough to have the forms translated into. At my kids' elementary school, during Covid, we learned that there are 32 different first languages spoken in the homes of students. Sharing information is a problem.

    Third, the subsidized lunch is often a lesser meal than what the paying kids get. It might be a cheese and white bread sandwich, an apple sauce, and some milk. Now, sure, if you're hungry, food is better than no food. But kids know what the brown bag lunch means. It's embarrassing, creates division across income levels, and can encourage some hungry kids to choose not to accept the food rather than face ridicule.

    But you know what's amazing? During Covid, school meal providers were facing financial ruin. They had contracts to provide food for a bunch of kids that weren't in the schools. Sysco and Aramark and many others were staring at a total loss for all of their school lunch programs, and the government bailed them out. The state and federal governments found a way to pay for all the school lunches and give them away for free to all students in every state. There wasn't even a debate, and no politicians opposed it.

    The money was just there, no strings or hoops or pork barrel haggling. Major industry is facing crisis, and suddenly we can afford to feed all the kids, no exceptions, no forms or paperwork. Local food banks were overflowing with frozen meals and fresh produce and all the tiny cartons of milk you can imagine.

    Now, you could say that Covid was an emergency, that the collapse of the school lunch industry would have horrible economic ramifications, and that would be true.

    But it wasn't even expensive, and that was for everybody. There's no reason we could not afford to provide free lunches to any child in America who asks for it, and I mean a real lunch. The same thing the kid who paid is getting. School cafeterias throw away more food than the value of food given away as part of free lunch programs AND unpaid lunch debts combined. Feeding every child would be a rounding error, and nobody would be stigmatized or penalized because their parents couldn't afford their lunch.

    Hungry kids don't learn. Feed them all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    First, not every state participates. This is free money that states could use to feed hungry kids, and some states are just like "nah, fuck them kids."

    Alabama, Alaska, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Vermont and Wyoming.

    The program requires states to pay half of the administrative costs - not the benefit itself, just the costs associated with distributing the benefit.

    The federal free lunch program would have brought $18,000,000 to the state, at a total cost of $300,000 to the state. The governor refused the program, saying "I don't believe in welfare."

    Nebraska receives $1,100,000,000 per year in agricultural subsidies. He doesn't have a problem taking federal dollars to feed pigs, but kids are on their own.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [+] 27 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 23 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I hate seeing these articles as if those people should be thankful for the kindness of some random person instead of being angry that school lunch debt is something that actually exists.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 18 points 2 years ago*

    children having lunch debt isnt a thing that should exist in the supposedly richest country in the world.

    and it shouldnt be reliant upon kind and generous donations for them to be fed.

    for fucks sake, I'm tired of these stories made to look as feel good stories when they are nothing but documentation of the decline of our civilization.

    "Oh, yes, children. You can't eat today because you are poor, lest some generous noble allows it with a meager donation of a fraction of their wealth"

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago*

    Malnutrition leads to all kinds of cognitive problems or developmental issues, which just increases the burden on society later from medical or social issues developed by such people. Lunch debt is a shitty, gross concept and I hate living in a world where it exists.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago

    What a world we live in, where charities have to step in to stop children going into debt over school lunches...

    You'd think that one of the wealthiest governments in the world would have a better solution to this problem by now than relying on charity

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    1 million initiative from the Arby’s Foundation

    This with their slogan "we've got the meats" and there is a good cannibalism joke somewhere in there.

    Yes, charity is great. Fixing society level problems with society level solutions is better. We need to get salaries higher and limit the cost of living increases. For food the best way is to stop paying farmers to under produce and instead work on getting the price to move food down. Let the price for food rush to the bottom and at the same time increase the salaries of everyone on the bottom.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    Yeah, I was thinking for what arby’s pays lobbyists to avoid taxes and wage increases, they could lobby once more for higher wages, higher taxes on wealthy and corporations, lower retail cost, and more government dollars for free, comprehensive, quality food, education and healthcare and just fix the problem. The C employees and board wouldn’t even have to do without another yacht to do it, just budget better.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago* (5 children)

    It's a clash of two worldviews. The purest form of capitalism believes that the individual is selfish and thinks only of himself. Therefore, it's up to the individual to succeed no matter what, relying only on himself.

    On the other hand, we have the Scandinavian system, where the individual is not inherently selfish, but selfless, it's all about reciprocity, helping each other.

    To me, the purest form of capitalism is pure evil. It sees the world as half empty instead of half full.

    Lunch debt should not be a thing.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [+] 9 points 2 years ago (14 children)
    load more comments (14 replies)
    [+] 7 points 2 years ago* (2 children)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [+] 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›