top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 168 points 3 years ago (12 children)

Kinda an incendiary headline when it’s just Mastercard complying with the law. From the article: "The federal government considers cannabis sales illegal, so these purchases are not allowed on our systems," Really the issue is that Marijuana should be legal at the federal level.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    Yet it stays illegal because of conservative boomers and their fucking grand kids.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    When polled, majorities are in support of legalization. If people would show up to vote more than once every 4 years we could make some actual progress on this issue. But since at least half of registered voters sit out every race, well here we are.

    Worth noting that even some conservatives support legalization!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    It's too bad those conservatives who do support it are the same people who vote against all of their own interests constantly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [+] 58 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (12 children)
  • [–] 30 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Mastercard doesn't give a crap about weed, and aren't trying to control anything. They don't want to be a part of federally illegal transactions. They want to follow the law, because they're a big business and it's dangerous not to. This is simple a result of the fact that weed is federally illegal - any other move on mastercard's part would be irresponsible at this time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 45 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

    Cannabis? Oh man we can't break the law. Better not chance it.

    Some weird Bitcoin mortgage backed security being bought by Goldman Sachs to resell to their pension holders? Oh so good.

  • source
  • [–] 42 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    There should be a law prohibiting these payment companies to be picky when it comes to legal transactions.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 39 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    This is sort of off topic but the constraints credit card companies put on porn is ridiculous. Cannabis, sadly, is illegal federally. Porn is legal everywhere in the country.

    I'd very much support legislation that required payment processors to not discriminate against any firm provided the business transaction is legal.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 28 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    I hope people remember these companies and politicians who attempted to blockade Cannabis businesses when it is invariably made federally legal. They will more than likely never face the consequences of their stupidity while they turn a blind eye to armed robberies that are specifically caused by these policies yet get fat on the tax revenue regardless.

    The idea that we need to plead fealty to these degenerates to get them to take common sense approaches to issues that the majority of the voter base has agreed on for a decade is ridiculous. No matter how anybody personally feels about Cannabis consumption it never has and never will go away. Prohibition doesn't work, and attempting to legislate other peoples ethics is a losing gambit.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    Time to change lines of business. "We're a taco shop, but you can buy weed here in compliamce with local laws. Sorry if you receipt just says TACOS no matter what you buy. We're working on that."

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago

    Basically what dispensaries in Washington, DC do. Everything is a "donation" or an "art purchase" and the pot is a "gift". Total nonsense, but it mostly works, because DC intends to legalize recreational marijuana sales, and Congress isn't letting it happen. So it seems like enforcement is just lax.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 20 points 3 years ago (20 children)

    Step 1.) Add ATM in lobby. Step 2.) Tell customers they can't use cards because of laws. Step 3.) Customer uses debit card at ATM and then purchases weed with the cash they just used their debit card to get.

    Fuck it. Not hard at all.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    Yes, but the problem is that the volume of cash makes retailers a massive target. People have been killed over this, and will continue to be put in danger until customers have access to the same payment resources that all other retail businesses take for granted. This is not a trivial issue at all. There are serious real world consequences to these decisions that paint the industry in a bad light when they are a DIRECT consequence of the inaction of the federal government. We are never going back to prohibition. There is simply too much tax revenue generated, and too much public sentiment on the side of both legalization as well as ending the failed drug war policies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago (10 children)

    And the transaction fee goes right to the bank.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    You get charged for a cash withdrawal? That's rare here in the UK.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Banks are kind of shitty here - if you use another bank's ATM, your bank (or the other, or sometimes both) will charge a small fee. Usually it's something like $3, but some smaller banks and credit unions will actually pay all of those fees back, so a lot of folks don't even notice that it's there.

    This specific situation is weird because it's a dispensary, though. Thanks to the vagaries of local legality and federal illegality, the dispensaries are totally good selling drugs, but the banks are very much not good openly handling the payments for those drugs. Because of this, most dispensaries will contract their debit payments through a payment processor that can register their card readers as "cashless ATMs," and who will effectively launder all of their debit transactions. The end result of this is that while the customer can pay with a card like a normal store, they end up having to choose between paying the ATM fee at the ATM, or at the register.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 12 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Not surprising. Well, cash still exists, right? Or Monero..

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago (9 children)

    So real talk, VISA isn't much better - if you have a business selling tobacco, cannabis, or firearm related products you have a really hard time taking payments online. Most big vendors (like Paypal, Square, etc) won't work with you once you hit $5k to $10k a year in sales (for small businesses starting out you'll slip by for a few months until you grow big enough to get manually audited).

    Then you need to find special card processing banks who are approved by VISA to work with tobacco/firearm companies and go through all sorts of review before your store will be approved for processing payments.

    And that's just selling hardware like pipes and accessories. I'm not even talking about the raw material itself.

    This sucks, but it won't stop anyone, they'll simply switch to another service. I bet VISA's stock will pop tomorrow because of this news if it hasn't already haha

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (7 children)

    This really isn't that big of a deal anyways. Just deploy an ATM inside the shop as a courtesy. Bonus points if it's a nice machine that can give customers amounts in increments as little as $5.

    Since your business has cash as it's main method of payment; it should be fairly simple to keep said ATM stocked up.

    This at least would be the cheeky way to get around restrictions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 11 points 3 years ago

    Except Mastercard is lying, FinCEN has specifically issued guidance for national finance institutions (banks, credit cards, etc.) to be able to accept cannabis transactions in states that have legalized. Most of these finance institutions are just unwilling to accept the additional cost of complying with the regulations. There’s a reason why Valley National Bank is so popular with cannabis companies - it’s a national bank that follows FinCEN guidelines. It comes at a higher cost, but a lot of companies feel it’s worth it.

    And this FinCEN guidance wasn’t just issued - it was issued in 2014. The only reason the cannabis industry doesn’t have widespread access to traditional finance, and why banks keep lobbying for the SAFE Banking Act, is because the banks don’t want to have to do the extra work to comply with the FinCEN guidance.

    Note - I agree it’s stupid that cannabis is federally illegal and think it should be legalized (or at the very least deschedule it and let states decide if they’ll allow it). But Mastercard could choose to follow FinCEN guidance if they wanted to.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago (13 children)

    If you think about it, do you really want a history of federal crimes recorded on your bank account...?

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 6 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    No dispensary here accepts anything but cash because of the legalities anyway

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 6 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    ITT: Plenty of people who don’t understand how federal vs state laws work in regards to federally regulated businesses

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago

    ITT: plenty of people who don't remember 2007 or 2020. Financial forms obey the rules that they want to when they want to. The federal government works for them, not the other way around.

    This has nothing to do with the law this is MasterCard deciding to not go after that market.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›