38
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Don't police cars have cameras in them? That should be the only witness you need.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago

when a London police officer, driving a police cruiser southbound on William Street, attempted to turn eastbound onto York Street. During this turn, the cruiser collided with a cyclist.

Ahh, the passive voice. The cruiser struck the cyclist, not the cop driving the cruiser. Cops have no agency, donchaknow.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

They're just stuck in a bad system. I mean vehicle.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

Don't police cars have cameras in them? That should be the only witness you need.

"Dear police, please give us the evidence that will implicate you in a crime. Thanks in advance! Yours, -victims".

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

I mean, the SIU would find it highly suspicious if the camera footage was "lost", deleted, or tampered with. They'd automatically assume the officer did something wrong, so it's more for their protection than it is for public safety.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Doesn't Canada have the concept that destroyed or lost evidence indicates the evidence was contrary to the interests of the party that didn't produce it?

this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
38 points (95.2% liked)

Bicycles

4241 readers
30 users here now

Welcome to [email protected]

A place to share our love of all things with two wheels and pedals. This is an inclusive, non-judgemental community. All types of cyclists are accepted here; whether you're a commuter, a roadie, a MTB enthusiast, a fixie freak, a crusty xbiking hoarder, in the middle of an epic across-the-world bicycle tour, or any other type of cyclist!


Community Rules


Other cycling-related communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS