this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
129 points (94.5% liked)

pics

19580 readers
224 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I knew modern jets are huge, but I would've never thought it was this huge compared to a P-51

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Most WWII fighters were basically large engines with the smallest possible airframe fit around them. The only armaments typically carried were guns, so they were light, fast and nimble.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Human for scale.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

I prefer this one with the two Lightnings together.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Two excellent airframes of their respective eras!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Crazy to think that there's less than a century between them. Imagine where we'll be another 80 years from now.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Crazy to also think about the cost difference between them. Adjusted for inflation the mustang was about $1 million ($50,000). About $80 million for the F-35.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Hey @[email protected], would you please consider cross-posting some of your military aircraft photos to [email protected]? Would love to have more people participating in the community.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Im surprised that the F-35 is able to maintain lift at that airspeed. I'd imagine that they're not very stable at low speed to increase maneuverability.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I'd imagine the cockpit is lit up like a Christmas tree with speed, AoA and stall warnings.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is this the new version of the "how it started - how it's going" meme?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

How it started would be a WWI biplane like the Nieuport 28 or Sopwith Camel, but I don’t think the F-35 can fly slow enough to fly with one of those, unless it’s the Marines’ VTOL variant.