124
Using this precedent, Biden should cancel student debt.
this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
124 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
10177 readers
104 users here now
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The Alabama governor is then going to fuck around and find out. He's not above the law and failure to comply with a court order could result in prosecution.
Their goal isnt to win this fight, it's to delay the process long enough to install someone that'll declare them the victor.
Who's going to prosecute him? Garland? Lmao.
Her. Kay Ivey is a woman.
I'll admit the idea Alabama could have elected a female governor did not occur to me, seems somewhat out of character tbh.
Watch 2 minutes of her speaking, you’ll understand. She’s a GrandKaren.
She. The governor is a woman.
And Dems will refuse to either A) send in the national guard to enforce the law or B) say fuck it the courts are irrelevant and ignore all the BS decisions they want
I thought we settled this shit in 1865.
1869 at the latest (Texas v. White)
Not even a little.
There was th Civil War and white folk got to pretend shit was settled while back folk knew better. Took until the 60s for things to start to shake up and even then White's weren't sure they should support something like requiring equal treatment.
Then we got the Voting Rights Act Then SCOTUS, in recent years, decided we didn't need that anymore. People are legitimately surprise the Court decided this way. Recent rulings have been a constant erosion.
No doubt. I was thinking about Southern ‘patriots’ deciding they can ignore the federal government when it suits them. But to your point, they had to send in marshals just so little kids could go to school, and that happened in living memory so … yeah.
The three-judge panel that unanimously ordered the existing map redrawn last year is set to hold a hearing on Aug. 14, when it could decide to tap a special master.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/21/us/politics/alabama-congress-district-map.html
view more: next ›