this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
76 points (95.2% liked)

Selfhosted

40040 readers
651 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I like the beelink and minisforum nucs more than Intel branded.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have a beelink and its been a great pc.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have in on backorder to use as my plex server

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I known this us a few days old but just wanted to chime in. I've been enjoying the "1 liter/mini pc" trend in home lab/server lately. I got myself a couple of hp elitedesk mini 600 g4's for $120 each on ebay, they have an 8th gen intel i5 and support quicksync. If you're patient you can find similar mini pcs for around the $100 price range, they're generally cheaper than nuc or nuc clones and since they're big name brands (hp, lenovo, Dell, etc all have a version of them) you can find parts for them easily on the used market.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I saw some of the HP and Lenovo mini PC's on ebay, etc for a decent price. I went with the BeeLink because of the deal I got on it. $250 USD for a 10th gen i5, 16GB RAM, and a 500GB M2. Figure I would spend the bit of extra money for an more up to date proc and extra RAM. I tend to keep machines for a VERY long time so I wanted to start at a good spot.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You got me looking at these since I've been thinking about upgrading from my raspi w/ 2 ssd raid. Think this is a good deal to accomplish that?

https://store.minisforum.com/products/minisforum-hm80?_pos=2&_sid=c5e848e07&_ss=r

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I bought a HM80 a while back and am very happy with it. It replaced an Intel i5 Nuc, Would purchase again.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Definitely a fan of Bee-link. That's what all my lab compute is now.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I enjoy seeing all the new ASUS hardware but I’ve never had luck with their service department. For the past decade, any time I’ve dealt with them it has been a less-than-satisfying experience

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Bro get your artichoke off the nuc

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Funny how Asus swept that from Gigabyte who had already a similar product line

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Asus also has a similar line. Just they carry and market this line of products in limited countries only.

It is also not that odd to see Asus grabbing the Intel NUC business. Intel NUCs have been contract manufactured by Pegatron, the OEM manufacturing spin-off of the original ASUSTeK Computer Inc., whose majority shareholder is still ASUSTek.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Ah, I see, didn't knew about the Pegatron bit. Thanks for the info!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

And the ASRock Deskmini range. I'm currently using one with an older Kaby Lake i7 as my Docker host.

load more comments
view more: next ›