distraction from him trying to veto any recent bills, and being against the billionaire tax. hes aiming for 2028 presidency.
post
This appears to a pretty rare case of Newsome doing something he sincerly believes in. His advisors were telling him not to do this because it polled poorly among general election voters in the US. This is also something that he has fairly consistantly done. After a ballot initiative passed to speed up executions and the court challenges expired he issued a morratorium on executions and took the state execution chamber apart.
Between this and Vance distancing himself from Trump, I guess posturing for the 2028 presidential election is now in full swing.
Nearly any other Democrat would be better than Newsom.
And, with this announcement, Newsome 2028 has begun. 😅
But, props where props are due. Death penalty gets handed out far too often and far too disproportionately, within a legal system that gets stuff wrong far too often.
He already put a moratorium on the death penalty in CA back in 2019. Its literally nothing other than posturing. Its about the most Gavin shit he could pull right now.
He nuked the billionaire tax...
Oh, I’m not his fan girl. Just giving a nod for when someone does the right thing.
Broken clock something something
I'm onboard with this. I'm not necessarily opposed to the death penalty, but our society has demonstrated again and again we are not applying this, the ultimate punishment, equally to everyone across our society. There are large class and race issues that appear to subject some groups to much greater death penalty judgments than other groups.
Unequal justice is injustice. Ban the death penalty.
I'm not necessarily opposed to the death penalty
Everyone should be, for a very simple reason.
It is permanent, there is no way to recover from it once completed.
I am against the death penalty, and for essentially the same reason, but I think, generally, you can't recover if you've been on death row or even just falsely imprisoned for years. If somebody's been imprisoned for 15 years and they turn out to be innocent, they can be released and compensated, but I don't know if they can really recover.
That's why it's so important to be really certain when doling out any punishment.
I find it interesting that I start with my post about saying I support the banning the death penalty, and I close with the post with my support for banning the death penalty. Yet multiple people are clipping out both of those agreements to focus on the an intermediate disagreement.
We arrive at the same conclusion to ban the death penalty, but you don't like the first reason why I want it banned. Why fight a battle that is already won?
I'll try to say something a little more precise, I hope. I have limited sympthy for the individual fate of somebody who does some of the things that can get a person executed, but the death penalty itself is not a good thing.
I just don't see the value in revenge, and as much as we all feel for victims, the reason you have society make these decisions is because you know victims and their families can't be objective. Maybe some of them will even really feel better, but the rest of us won't. The death penalty can only go wrong, either by being inequitably applied or literally dooming the wrong person to die with no way to salvage what's left of their lives if you learn of the mistake later. Or hell, with recent attempts, it can just literally go wrong and torture someone, maybe even without even killing them.
Permanent removal from free society is more than sufficient for public safety and deterrence. More blood doesn't bring anyone's loved ones back; it just makes a community that much more grim for indulging its worst instincts.
top 50 comments