Democrat’s move prevents these people from executions under future governors, after Christa Pike’s failed execution

Gavin Newsom, California’s governor, has commuted the death sentences of more than 500 people on the state’s death row on Thursday, a move that ensures they can never be executed under future administrations.

The Democrat’s mass commutation at the end of his term has converted all of the state’s death sentences to life without the possibility of parole, the largest clearing of any US death row in modern history.

The move comes after the failed execution of Christa Pike in Tennessee sparked global outrage and renewed calls for a nationwide pause on capital punishment.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 38 minutes ago

distraction from him trying to veto any recent bills, and being against the billionaire tax. hes aiming for 2028 presidency.

  • source
  • This appears to a pretty rare case of Newsome doing something he sincerly believes in. His advisors were telling him not to do this because it polled poorly among general election voters in the US. This is also something that he has fairly consistantly done. After a ballot initiative passed to speed up executions and the court challenges expired he issued a morratorium on executions and took the state execution chamber apart.

  • source
  • [–] 101 points 12 hours ago* (6 children)

    Between this and Vance distancing himself from Trump, I guess posturing for the 2028 presidential election is now in full swing.

    Nearly any other Democrat would be better than Newsom.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 7 hours ago* (4 children)

    [... any other Democrat would be better than Newsom].
    Message received. Get ready for Schumer 2028!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

    And, with this announcement, Newsome 2028 has begun. 😅

    But, props where props are due. Death penalty gets handed out far too often and far too disproportionately, within a legal system that gets stuff wrong far too often.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

    He nuked the billionaire tax...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

    Oh, I’m not his fan girl. Just giving a nod for when someone does the right thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 12 hours ago (19 children)

    Broken clock something something

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • load more comments (18 replies)
    [–] 14 points 12 hours ago (21 children)

    I'm onboard with this. I'm not necessarily opposed to the death penalty, but our society has demonstrated again and again we are not applying this, the ultimate punishment, equally to everyone across our society. There are large class and race issues that appear to subject some groups to much greater death penalty judgments than other groups.

    Unequal justice is injustice. Ban the death penalty.

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

    I'm not necessarily opposed to the death penalty

    Everyone should be, for a very simple reason.

    It is permanent, there is no way to recover from it once completed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 hours ago

    I am against the death penalty, and for essentially the same reason, but I think, generally, you can't recover if you've been on death row or even just falsely imprisoned for years. If somebody's been imprisoned for 15 years and they turn out to be innocent, they can be released and compensated, but I don't know if they can really recover.

    That's why it's so important to be really certain when doling out any punishment.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 9 hours ago

    I find it interesting that I start with my post about saying I support the banning the death penalty, and I close with the post with my support for banning the death penalty. Yet multiple people are clipping out both of those agreements to focus on the an intermediate disagreement.

    We arrive at the same conclusion to ban the death penalty, but you don't like the first reason why I want it banned. Why fight a battle that is already won?

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 8 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 child)

    I'll try to say something a little more precise, I hope. I have limited sympthy for the individual fate of somebody who does some of the things that can get a person executed, but the death penalty itself is not a good thing.

    I just don't see the value in revenge, and as much as we all feel for victims, the reason you have society make these decisions is because you know victims and their families can't be objective. Maybe some of them will even really feel better, but the rest of us won't. The death penalty can only go wrong, either by being inequitably applied or literally dooming the wrong person to die with no way to salvage what's left of their lives if you learn of the mistake later. Or hell, with recent attempts, it can just literally go wrong and torture someone, maybe even without even killing them.

    Permanent removal from free society is more than sufficient for public safety and deterrence. More blood doesn't bring anyone's loved ones back; it just makes a community that much more grim for indulging its worst instincts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (15 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›