He owes Jean E Caroll millions of dollars anytime he says he didn't rape her. Which he did
post
It's a funny quip but of course the person trying to shoot the president was referring to the president in his manifesto about trying to shoot the president
It can't possibly be this hard to kill a president, What's the holdup?
It’s been 63 years since the last presidential assassination, it’s not exactly a walk in the park to pull off
imagine a world where john hinckley jr didn't fuck up
If only Crooks went for center mass...
Most people don’t want to deal with the consequences. The damage to their families, the possibility of being killed themselves either by the cops or death penalty, the lies about them the press and political opponents would make up about them, everyone has some skeletons they wouldn’t want revealed, and the fact they’d be silenced and have no way to make a real case for why they did what they did. At best a lifetime in prison because, even if you're right, they’re gonna make an example of you because we can’t just have people killing presidents, y’know. I think also that they might realize that it’s probably cutting a head off the Hydra, some other PoS would just step up and continue the shitshow.
IOW you’d have to have someone with nothing to lose and the willingness to sacrifice themselves for such a deed, and the skills to pull it off.
Generally the kind of person willing to kill a president isn’t going to be sane, and if someone is sane and has the same idea they understand the price and aren’t going to want to do it. That, and things aren’t dire enough for a sane person to make the leap to do such a thing.
| don’t want to deal with the consequences
Americans will happily allow armed, masked men to violently kidnap people off the street in broad daylight and haven't fired a single shot. I wouldn't expect many of us to make the needed sacrifice.
You can't really be saying "haven't fired a single shot" in response to a thread on multiple failed assassination attempts.
Also about the only context I can think of where people are saying Americans don't have enough gun violence.
masked men to violently kidnap people off the street in broad daylight
Context clues tell me they're talking about ICE, not the assassination attempts. And if Americans are going to insist on sacrificing their children to school shooters in order to keep their precious guns, then yes they might as well put them to good use against ICE.
It can't possibly be this hard to kill a president
Unfortunately, it is.
What's the holdup?
Ridiculous amounts of security precautions/pissing away government resources.
That and bad aiming, I guess 🤷🏻
Call me a conspiracy theorist, but I think the bad aiming was an inside job. No way somebody can get so close to kill a President with modern day security.
You're always allowed to do it (well, "allowed") what's the hold up bucko?
Whatever excuse you give, I guarantee if we solved that you could find a few more excuses tucked away. Just like everyone else.
I was totally exhonorated
No you were not
Hold on. Was this interaction real? Any video?
https://m.youtube.com/shorts/IuGowLu1JRQ
There's also a video where PresiDunce Drumpf talks about E Jean Carroll enjoying being raped. I'll see if I can find it...
Edit: Found it.
https://m.youtube.com/shorts/rbybKgrH58M
Nah, that's disingenuous. 'The crosseyed fuck who tried to kill you had these damning accusations... oho, did you think those accusations were directed at you?' Yes. So was the bullet. It's not a fucking gotcha, it's plainly why you asked. You need a better retort for someone flatly denying labels for their demonstrable crimes.
Or better yet, don't platform fascists. You don't need a blathering attention whore in the room to lay out the case for all of those words being factually accurate. His narcissistic ass is never gonna tearfully admit it's all true. The Idiot picked a fight with a hurricane.
Who cares if it's disingenuous? The Republicans are masters of it and I can't remember the last time I saw one argue anything in good faith. In Canada we have a saying: When they go low, we kick them in the teeth. Democrats should adopt this wholeheartedly IMO. Especially when it comes to Trump himself.
Shit questions are still shit when they're ours. Don't poke The Idiot for correctly recognizing he was accused, nail him to the wall with the proof those accusations are correct! What's the fucking point of having all evidence on our side if we act just like lying fascists doing bully tactics over nothing?
I don't want a blue-team equivalent of whats-his-face jeering at Jack Smith with a hand full of nothing. I don't want progressive podcasts patting anyone's back over that kind of empty showmanship. I am not interested in making conservatives grumble like 'oh, shucks' when we hit them with a clever zinger. I want them to recoil. I want them to hear facts which keep them up at night, questioning the politics they have mistaken for an identity.
It's so utterly frustrating to see people that seem to have politics that are completely rooted in twitter clap backs.
notice image full of text\
check alt text\
findOh, referring to you?
That is wholly inadequate for an image full of text.
Ain't no way someone unable to read the image is going to get the whole thing.
Search engines won't find anything by the "text" either.
Don't cheat accessibility.
Do the text alternative properly.
top 50 comments