top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 185 points 5 days ago (6 children)

He owes Jean E Caroll millions of dollars anytime he says he didn't rape her. Which he did

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 54 points 5 days ago (5 children)

    I wonder if saying “I’m not a rapist” counts? Seems like it should.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 5 days ago (3 children)

    In New York, there is a legal difference between rape and sexual abuse. It is my (admittedly limited) understanding that digital penetration counts as sexual abuse in New York.

    So, according to the legal definition in NY and the idea that in the US people are innocent until proven guilty, maybe Trump can make the general claim "I'm not a rapist" without it counting as defamation. Maybe.

    But in colloquial terms, we can absolutely consider this to be a lie. Donald Trump is an adjudicated rapist; a jury determined that, a minimum of one time in his life, he physically forced sexual contact on a woman who did not consent. (And based on what we know about abusers in general and this man in particular, my money is on this not being the only time in his life that he sexually assaulted someone.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    If a judge has ruled he must pay Jean E Caroll millions of dollars anytime he says he didn't rape her, it stands to reason that “I am not a rapist” is a claim that he didn’t rape her.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 54 points 5 days ago (2 children)

    It's a funny quip but of course the person trying to shoot the president was referring to the president in his manifesto about trying to shoot the president

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 5 days ago (17 children)

    It can't possibly be this hard to kill a president, What's the holdup?

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 5 days ago (5 children)

    It’s been 63 years since the last presidential assassination, it’s not exactly a walk in the park to pull off

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 5 days ago (4 children)

    imagine a world where john hinckley jr didn't fuck up

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

    Most people don’t want to deal with the consequences. The damage to their families, the possibility of being killed themselves either by the cops or death penalty, the lies about them the press and political opponents would make up about them, everyone has some skeletons they wouldn’t want revealed, and the fact they’d be silenced and have no way to make a real case for why they did what they did. At best a lifetime in prison because, even if you're right, they’re gonna make an example of you because we can’t just have people killing presidents, y’know. I think also that they might realize that it’s probably cutting a head off the Hydra, some other PoS would just step up and continue the shitshow.

    IOW you’d have to have someone with nothing to lose and the willingness to sacrifice themselves for such a deed, and the skills to pull it off.

    Generally the kind of person willing to kill a president isn’t going to be sane, and if someone is sane and has the same idea they understand the price and aren’t going to want to do it. That, and things aren’t dire enough for a sane person to make the leap to do such a thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

    | don’t want to deal with the consequences

    Americans will happily allow armed, masked men to violently kidnap people off the street in broad daylight and haven't fired a single shot. I wouldn't expect many of us to make the needed sacrifice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    You can't really be saying "haven't fired a single shot" in response to a thread on multiple failed assassination attempts.

    Also about the only context I can think of where people are saying Americans don't have enough gun violence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • masked men to violently kidnap people off the street in broad daylight

    Context clues tell me they're talking about ICE, not the assassination attempts. And if Americans are going to insist on sacrificing their children to school shooters in order to keep their precious guns, then yes they might as well put them to good use against ICE.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 5 days ago (2 children)

    It can't possibly be this hard to kill a president

    Unfortunately, it is.

    What's the holdup?

    Ridiculous amounts of security precautions/pissing away government resources.

    That and bad aiming, I guess 🤷🏻

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    Call me a conspiracy theorist, but I think the bad aiming was an inside job. No way somebody can get so close to kill a President with modern day security.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 5 days ago

    John Oliver just did a story on just how overworked, poorly staffed, poorly disciplined and poorly paid the secret service is. It's a wonder there haven't been more close calls for the last several decades.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 5 days ago (1 child)

    You're always allowed to do it (well, "allowed") what's the hold up bucko?

    Whatever excuse you give, I guarantee if we solved that you could find a few more excuses tucked away. Just like everyone else.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 days ago

    I'm British, but yeah. I could probably manage an attempt if I didn't care about my kid. I guess that's the nice thing about being from earlier generations, they mostly didn't.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 33 points 5 days ago (3 children)

    I was totally exhonorated

    No you were not

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 5 days ago (3 children)

    Hold on. Was this interaction real? Any video?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 5 days ago

    I'm going to get so celebratory drunk when this piece of shit dies.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 5 days ago (9 children)

    Nah, that's disingenuous. 'The crosseyed fuck who tried to kill you had these damning accusations... oho, did you think those accusations were directed at you?' Yes. So was the bullet. It's not a fucking gotcha, it's plainly why you asked. You need a better retort for someone flatly denying labels for their demonstrable crimes.

    Or better yet, don't platform fascists. You don't need a blathering attention whore in the room to lay out the case for all of those words being factually accurate. His narcissistic ass is never gonna tearfully admit it's all true. The Idiot picked a fight with a hurricane.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 5 days ago* (5 children)

    Who cares if it's disingenuous? The Republicans are masters of it and I can't remember the last time I saw one argue anything in good faith. In Canada we have a saying: When they go low, we kick them in the teeth. Democrats should adopt this wholeheartedly IMO. Especially when it comes to Trump himself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 5 days ago (4 children)

    Shit questions are still shit when they're ours. Don't poke The Idiot for correctly recognizing he was accused, nail him to the wall with the proof those accusations are correct! What's the fucking point of having all evidence on our side if we act just like lying fascists doing bully tactics over nothing?

    I don't want a blue-team equivalent of whats-his-face jeering at Jack Smith with a hand full of nothing. I don't want progressive podcasts patting anyone's back over that kind of empty showmanship. I am not interested in making conservatives grumble like 'oh, shucks' when we hit them with a clever zinger. I want them to recoil. I want them to hear facts which keep them up at night, questioning the politics they have mistaken for an identity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)

    👨‍🍳💋

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 5 days ago

    Self censorship is the worst kind.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

    notice image full of text\
    check alt text\
    find

    Oh, referring to you?

    That is wholly inadequate for an image full of text.
    Ain't no way someone unable to read the image is going to get the whole thing.
    Search engines won't find anything by the "text" either.

    Don't cheat accessibility.
    Do the text alternative properly.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [+] 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)
    [removed by mod]
  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›