Shoulda been the p90... , or at least a Zat or something.
post
Sorry, it's gotta be Star Who, to fit the pattern. I don't make the rules.
I can't believe you didn't use the p90...
One of my least favorite tropes in sci-fi is ballistic weaponry being treated as ineffective simply because it's "old" technology. I really liked how they were handled in the Animorphs series. The Andalites and Yeerks both agreed that human firearms and missiles were "primitive, yet undeniably effective".
Didn't the movie take it a step further?
Guns couldn't get thru personal shields, so they were going to use a bow or throw a spear or something.
But I think Star Wars logiced it away the best. Ballistic weapons take a shit ton of logistics, energy blasters could just be charged by anything electrical.
It's less than an AR15 is worse in a single soldiers hands, it's that a blaster is easier to get into millions of troopers hands and keep them firing.
That 100% makes sense, and once militaries made the switch, it would make ballistic ammo insanely expensive and only used by wealthy bounty hunters, and only then in scenarios where they need the narrow advantage. They'd still default to a blaster.
Guns couldn't get thru personal shields, so they were going to use a bow or throw a spear or something.
That's almost a trope, too. In the Dune series it is the same, so consequently hand-to-hand combat is the norm. And even in Stargate Apophis had a personal shield protecting him from both staff weapons and Tauri projectile weapons until SG1 (I think it was O'Neill himself but it's been a hot minute s8nice I watched that episode) watched his guards pass him a staff weapon and O'Neill threw his knife through the shield in response.
Also, in Star Wars projectile weapons were still a thing (called sluggers or slug throwers), for example with the Sand People. And Jedi hunters often used slug throwers since projectiles could not be deflected by lightsabers, Mandalorians used this during their wars against the Jedi.
In Stargate, the ballistic weaponry was the most effective measure against the Replicators (until they eventually developed the special anti-replicator weapon). Asgard technology was decades ahead of our own, but they had to admit that shotguns were actually better at defending from Replicators than any weapon they had.
Also ballistic weaponry was remarkably effective against the jaffa and human soldiers of the goauld because, despite the system lord's technological edge, they had focused on using terror tactics to cow primitive cultures and when facing more advanced civilizations stuck to orbital bombardment so never really developed personal armaments aside from their own personal shields, which they didn't give to their troops.
It was less about how effective old weapons were, and moreso the Asgard's stupid-advanced way of thinking was ineffective against the replicators and needed to dumb it down with human ingenuity
This, recruits, is a 20-kilo ferrous slug. Feel the weight! Every five seconds, the main gun of an Everest-class Dreadnought accelerates one to 1.3 percent of light speed. It impacts with the force of a 38-kiloton bomb. That is three times the yield of the city buster dropped on Hiroshima back on Earth. That means: Sir Isaac Newton is the deadliest son-of-a-bitch in space!
I always thought they should establish in some of these universes that fabric technology has progressed to the point where ordinary clothing is bulletproof, which is why they need glowy beam weapons. They could've done that in Star Trek, but I guess it was more important to show off Shatner's chest.
technology has progressed to the point where ordinary clothing is bulletproof
This happened between John Wick 2 and 3. Turned a good film series into boys playing guns.
Pew pew, I got you.
No you didn't, I was hiding behind my lapel.
In star trek technology has advanced to the point that Shatner's tiddies are bulletproof
The way I always saw it.
Star Wars was the every man sci-fi
Star Trek was the thinking mans sci-fi
Stargate was the military mans sci-fi
I get that this is a gross over generization, but Star Trek pushed the whole "Prime Directive" thing, where Stargate said "There are few problems you cant solve by arming the locals with P90s".
"There are few problems you cant solve by arming the locals with P90s".
This immediately comes to mind:
Colonel, the United States is not in the business of interfering in other people's affairs.
Since when, Sir?
Since this administration was elected.
How does Babylon 5 fit into this paradigm? The dude who loves to hear his own voice's sci fi (go monolog the shadows to death John)
When in doubt, C4
Now there's an oft forgotten body horror.

For late 80s Doctor Who, C4 and a baseball bat is also an option.
What about galaxy quest?
Not (just) being a shit, I legitimately forgot what handheld weaponry the humans in that universe use
Sir, this a Wendy's Star Trek community.
How does one put up shelves with a phaser?
Better than with C4
Can you set a laser sword to overcharge and blow up?
That depends on who the writer is. But a helpful equivalent might be to imagine trying to do the same thing to something like a laptop battery. It's certainly possible, and probably not all that difficult under controlled circumstances. But doing it on a whim, "in the field" is probably difficult to accomplish on purpose, and there certainly isn't a button you can press to make it happen because that would be incredibly dangerous to have on something you carry with you and use every day.
I guess I don't know enough about light saber physics to know what kind of modifications you'd have to make. But it's a least something a rogue could do with it; nothing's as good as a blaster at your side.
In Dune, yes. Shooting a shield with a laser creates a nuclear explosion equivalent.


top 50 comments