top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 11 points 1 day ago

Shoulda been the p90... , or at least a Zat or something.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    Sorry, it's gotta be Star Who, to fit the pattern. I don't make the rules.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

    on the other hand, this now has me curious about the exploits of the other doctors - Dr. Wars, Dr. Trek and Dr. Gate

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 1 day ago (28 children)
  • [–] 28 points 1 day ago (24 children)

    One of my least favorite tropes in sci-fi is ballistic weaponry being treated as ineffective simply because it's "old" technology. I really liked how they were handled in the Animorphs series. The Andalites and Yeerks both agreed that human firearms and missiles were "primitive, yet undeniably effective".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 day ago (7 children)

    Didn't the movie take it a step further?

    Guns couldn't get thru personal shields, so they were going to use a bow or throw a spear or something.

    But I think Star Wars logiced it away the best. Ballistic weapons take a shit ton of logistics, energy blasters could just be charged by anything electrical.

    It's less than an AR15 is worse in a single soldiers hands, it's that a blaster is easier to get into millions of troopers hands and keep them firing.

    That 100% makes sense, and once militaries made the switch, it would make ballistic ammo insanely expensive and only used by wealthy bounty hunters, and only then in scenarios where they need the narrow advantage. They'd still default to a blaster.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 day ago

    Guns couldn't get thru personal shields, so they were going to use a bow or throw a spear or something.

    That's almost a trope, too. In the Dune series it is the same, so consequently hand-to-hand combat is the norm. And even in Stargate Apophis had a personal shield protecting him from both staff weapons and Tauri projectile weapons until SG1 (I think it was O'Neill himself but it's been a hot minute s8nice I watched that episode) watched his guards pass him a staff weapon and O'Neill threw his knife through the shield in response.

    Also, in Star Wars projectile weapons were still a thing (called sluggers or slug throwers), for example with the Sand People. And Jedi hunters often used slug throwers since projectiles could not be deflected by lightsabers, Mandalorians used this during their wars against the Jedi.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • [–] 16 points 1 day ago (5 children)

    In Stargate, the ballistic weaponry was the most effective measure against the Replicators (until they eventually developed the special anti-replicator weapon). Asgard technology was decades ahead of our own, but they had to admit that shotguns were actually better at defending from Replicators than any weapon they had.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Also ballistic weaponry was remarkably effective against the jaffa and human soldiers of the goauld because, despite the system lord's technological edge, they had focused on using terror tactics to cow primitive cultures and when facing more advanced civilizations stuck to orbital bombardment so never really developed personal armaments aside from their own personal shields, which they didn't give to their troops.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 8 points 1 day ago

    This, recruits, is a 20-kilo ferrous slug. Feel the weight! Every five seconds, the main gun of an Everest-class Dreadnought accelerates one to 1.3 percent of light speed. It impacts with the force of a 38-kiloton bomb. That is three times the yield of the city buster dropped on Hiroshima back on Earth. That means: Sir Isaac Newton is the deadliest son-of-a-bitch in space!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    I always thought they should establish in some of these universes that fabric technology has progressed to the point where ordinary clothing is bulletproof, which is why they need glowy beam weapons. They could've done that in Star Trek, but I guess it was more important to show off Shatner's chest.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    The way I always saw it.

    Star Wars was the every man sci-fi

    Star Trek was the thinking mans sci-fi

    Stargate was the military mans sci-fi

    I get that this is a gross over generization, but Star Trek pushed the whole "Prime Directive" thing, where Stargate said "There are few problems you cant solve by arming the locals with P90s".

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)
  • [–] 16 points 1 day ago (7 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    For late 80s Doctor Who, C4 and a baseball bat is also an option.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 1 point 22 hours ago

    What about galaxy quest?

    Not (just) being a shit, I legitimately forgot what handheld weaponry the humans in that universe use

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Sir, this a Wendy's Star Trek community.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    How does one put up shelves with a phaser?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 7 points 1 day ago (6 children)

    Can you set a laser sword to overcharge and blow up?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 day ago* (2 children)

    That depends on who the writer is. But a helpful equivalent might be to imagine trying to do the same thing to something like a laptop battery. It's certainly possible, and probably not all that difficult under controlled circumstances. But doing it on a whim, "in the field" is probably difficult to accomplish on purpose, and there certainly isn't a button you can press to make it happen because that would be incredibly dangerous to have on something you carry with you and use every day.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›