It's pretty wild that universities are allowed to handle rape allegations in the first place.
post
The thing that fucks me up every time is that campus police are allowed to handle crimes that aren’t, say, parking or littering. How did we even get to the point that schools were allowed to cover up crimes to save their reputations? Why is Cornell giving state police a role that they should’ve had the whole time?
Campus police are actual police. They handle all crimes in their jurisdiction. Yes, you could argue there's a conflict of interest.
Generally, the state police aren't involved in singular, local crimes. That's why giving them a role is new.
Generally, the state police aren’t involved in singular, local crimes.
They are in Los Angeles.
OP is making me imagine someone arguing with a municipal cop about his authority to investigate matters and it's making me laugh.
Give? I’ve never understood why universities can seem to have this power.
Most universities like Cornell are backed by extremely rich, extremely influential alumni who keep giving them far more money than they can actually use precisely so their kids can enjoy the same rape culture they did.
It doesn’t help that Cornell law produces some of the best lawyers in the country.
Friend mentioned that when a similar thing happened at his University, the frats just had "gatherings" instead of "parties" and that was ok with the administration.... (probably decades ago, so a slightly different environment)
One of the fraternities at my first college got kicked off campus because the frat brothers beat up a pledge and kicked him down the basement stairs where he broke his neck and died. His corpse wasn't discovered until late the next day after a campus-wide search. No criminal charges resulted because the police couldn't determine who had actually done it. The frat just moved to an off-campus house where their parties became even more popular because of the complete lack of oversight.
It's not different. You're not going to stop college kids from partying. They'll just go to an unaffiliated house and continue.
I know Cornell wants to be seen as doing something, but this is actually counterproductive. It pushes the parties underground, where there's less safety and oversight.
Had a similar thing in the early 2000’s - an on campus frat got in trouble for serving minors and was forced to not have any parties for the next year. Basically just meant that they couldn’t have big weekend parties or anything really big with invitations on campus. They could still have folks over during the week and the quarterly parties were just at off campus venues
you can't stop people from having a completely unrelated™ off campus event, so why bother doing anything more than telling them to change the name of the on campus event
how about removing all frats/sororities/“greek life” together?
First amendment guarantees freedom of association.
And as long as you don't dare criticize the government, the police will happily let you associate.
fair point. they can still associate, just not have the formal recognition as greek houses they tend to get in college.
or maybe just the colleges need to “allow” the rape investigations from the cops, instead of doing it themselves. that’s a start.
Cornell, like a lot of major universities, does have their own full police department, with the same powers as the city police. So there's no difference between themselves and the cops.
Whether there's a conflict of interest because they are university police is a separate question, and I would say yes.
It doesn't guarantee that association has to happen on houses near or on school property. It doesn't mean the school has to be a partner with that association.
But what would the actual difference be if they had no institutional affiliation? Does the university own their houses and could kick them out? Aren't these fraternities rich and could just buy another one?
Less legitimacy, less prestige, less convenience, etc.
There are multiple answers to your questions depending on what college were talking about. Sometimes the schools rent the frat houses, sometimes they are owned through alumni corporations that work with the schools.
Yeah they totally could and will buy another house off campus, and I am fine with that. They will have to deal with Municipal police instead of campus police. I am not fine with them having some of the best buildings on campus.
They also need to lose tax exemption status.
Man, that's gonna be a depressing winter up in Ithaca. I don't necessarily disagree with the decision, but I can imagine the non-rapey students being very upset at becoming collateral damage control.
all 35 comments