So for a long time pretty much every computer used the traditional like windows layout with moveable windows that minimized or maximized and had a taskbar and start menu and whatnot. You had some minor changes with Mac and stuff, but now you can really have some radically different ways to use a computer.

Personally I have differing preferences if I'm using a laptop or a desktop.

On my desktop I prefer a dock and to use the mouse to click around. More of the windows style. Then on a laptop (which I use most often) I use a heavily gesture based navigation.

Currently I have Gnome modified so that when I am in a program, like the web browser I'm in typing this, it is full screen. The top bar is hidden, and there's no dock of any kind. Not even one that pops up when I move the mouse to the edge of the screen. Instead I have everything for navigation hidden inside the task view. I swipe up on the trackpad with 3 fingers to bring it up. That's how I see time, battery life, and the other topbar stuff too. If switching quickly between two things I put one of them in a 2nd desktop and use a 3 finger side swipe to move back and forth.

I'm curious to know what other unique or highly custom navigation methods people are using on Linux. I know tiling window managers are pretty popular. Is there a general consensus on what's best these days? Or is everyone doing slightly different things?

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 31 minutes ago

I prefer a top bar that contains global menu, system tray, launcher icon and applications at around 30px height. I also remove titlebars on windows because I use keyboard shortcuts for all of those actions.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 hours ago

    I liked the concept of Niri, but found some bugs, and now I run Gnome with PaperWM and a couple more customizations. Love my setup.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 4 hours ago*

    Bash is awesome. If I ever go blind I could still use linux comfortably with text-to-speech thanks to the terminal. I just need to finally sit down and learn awk.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 9 hours ago

    On a laptop, I like tiling and heavy use of workspaces with touchpad/touchscreen gestures. I also like having the fold back over itself tablet mode and stylus input.

    On a desktop, I like more standard floating windows across multiple monitors with lighter use of workspaces, controlled by keyboard shortcuts.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 11 hours ago

    Tiling Window Manager, no bar, fullscreen terminal with btop on workspace 1, 40% split ortholinear keyboard, neovim, vimium in librewolf, vim in shell...vim keybindings everywhere.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

    I feel really lost with all these users talking about window managers, hotkeys and specific terms. I feel like a rookie😅

    If someone has a video comparing a lot of different workflows, I’d love to watch it. I feel like my workflow could still be improved.

    Currently I use Gnome on my Surface Go (hooked to a big screen) daily driver, Cosmic on my old MacBook Pro and KDE on my Steam Deck (hooked to the same big screen).

    I love Gnome and how I’ve configured (with an extension) every program to open on a specific workspace at startup while just using gestures or keyboard to move between workspaces.

    I’ve kind of reproduced this with KDE and Cosmic, but it’s not as perfect.

    KDE doesn’t follow the window rules I’m setting and Cosmic doesn’t let you automatically start programs on a specific workspace.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 13 hours ago (1 child)

    You probably know a lot of the stuff just not the terms for it. If you are interested in like tiling or scrolling window managers you can look up videos on those terms and see them. The difference between them and a DE is that they are literally JUST a window manager. They don't come with the other features of a DE. You basically won't have a GUI unless you build one out. This gets you into the realm of like Linux ricing. Where people spend tons of effort and time making their computers look and function in a unique way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 hours ago

    Yeah I guess I should do this in order to learn more about window managers and hotkeys.

    Still I know that I need a DE for sure for now. Even on a DE, I find the explanations about how to use them kind of lacking.

    For instance, Gnome doesn’t tell you that you can spread 7 programs on 7 workspaces if I’m not mistaken.

    At the beginning, I was really using a kind of Windows workflow instead of discovering the full power of Gnome..

    This applies to the other DEs I use too..

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

    Ever since I tried tiling window managers, I can't go back to traditional style of handling windows anymore. Nowadays I'm on KDE, but I use extensions to automatically tile every window I open and close. Single applications are stretched to fullscreen, and every opened up window would then scale the applications to half screen and so on. There are different logics and algorithms (known as layouts) how this can work. Multi virtual desktops are a must with this philosophy, when opening and grouping multiple applications. In general automatic tiling (with manual intervention and rules for specific windows) does have its own problems sometimes.

    Recently, and I mean since yesterday, I changed the philosophy to a different philosophy. I'm currently on an endless tiler, where windows are opened up and can be scrolled from left to right on the screen. The most prominent of these type of window managers would be Niri, but I use an extension on KDE to emulate this behavior.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 20 hours ago* (1 child)

    What do you think of niri? I think i'm of a similar mind. I switched to i3 10ish years ago, and could never go back to a floating WM. Now on sway and am perfectly content with my workflow. I'm curious to try out niri, but haven't really been that motivated to try it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 20 hours ago

    First, two days ago there there was a post that might interest you (BTW I still don't get how to link properly in Lemmy): https://lemmy.ml/post/53788147 - Opinions on Niri (and scrollable window managers)?

    I always found Niri intriguing. But never tried this type of window managing, because two reasons: a) if windows are layed out out of my view, I still have to scroll or search otherwise, so it is it really a win against floating windows? At least this was my thought process, and b) the automatic tiling is in my flesh and blood, not sure how this would affect me as my thinking and every operation is hard wired to it. But tiling of windows comes with their own problems as you know.

    Opening a window that is basically fullscreen or its own size without getting tiled, has its pros. I don't use Niri, but the KDE extension "Karousel" works pretty well so far. I can still float single window or put them in a stack, or tile (up and bottom part of a group), and I still have my multiple desktops. So it's a bit weird at the moment, but maybe just need time to get used to it and to rewire some of my brain. It's too early to talk about experience and what issues could popup. This is my current situation and thoughts about the Niri concept (just not Niri directly).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 15 hours ago
    [–] 3 points 19 hours ago

    KDE for me with floating windows. For certain things, I'll use s terminal, but most of my navigation is through KDE and some keybinds I set up on a keypad.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    On laptop, full tiling like i3/sway. I hate inserting a mouse to use a laptop, which tiling lets me avoid.

    On desktop, tiling's good but doesn't really feel like a requirement. Something like COSMIC where you can choose between both works better.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 day ago (6 children)

    I've tried a window manager once and now can't go back. It's to a point where I start using my Linux keybinds on my Windows laptop at work.

    I tried KDE and Gnome but those weren't really for me. I did like the polished end-to-end experience you get with those desktop environments though.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 21 hours ago

    I was tiling window manager user too (mainly qtile), nowadays I'm on KDE using extensions to emulate those tiling features. Krohnkite is pretty good, once setup with all the keys and other optional stuff like removing window titles and so on. Recently even switch to a Niri like extension, called Karousel, but this one doesn't support multi monitors. So I end up getting the KDE set with a tiling experience.

    COSMIC will have a builtin support for tiling too, with a seamless integration. So maybe this could be something you explore too.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Currently using niri with title bars hidden on main PC hotkeys to navigate and gnome on the TV pc with the hide top bar extension and dash to dock both on intelligent hide... Hotkeys snap to side and drag to resize

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    It seems that hotkeys are very popular. I've got a few custom ones for media controls (shift+[ or ] for skip/go back, and insert for play/pause) How many different hotkeys are we talking?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago

    A good bit... To be honest, there's too many for me to remember other than the ones that I frequently use. I pretty much just use the default Niri config keybinds and then added a few of my own and changed a couple to preference

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

    I changed my taskbar to be like the one in Haiku OS because I don't like long taskbar.

    Not even one that pops up when I move the mouse to the edge of the screen.

    how do you do that?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 17 hours ago
    • GUI - on SailfishOS phone
    • TUI - on PDA / Linux handheld with physical keyboard
    • Manual tiling WM on Laptop and PC - current order of preference StumpWM, GNOME PaperWM, i3 / sway.
  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    Manual tiling/placement and focus with a full sized keyboard, giving me one-key-combo focus of any window on the screen, and exact placement/sizing. Unfortunately most window managers and compositors lack support for this. Tiling WMs are stubbornly self-arranging or only support swapping windows, which they'll later rearrange.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 22 hours ago (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 19 hours ago (1 child)

    Actually not.. but I'll have to check it out now!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 18 hours ago

    i3wm https://i3wm.org/ however it's X11 only, no Wayland support. Sway https://swaywm.org/ is a close replacement for i3, but for Wayland. Almost a drop in replacement. I didn't use it for long time, because I actually wanted to have automatic tiling and i3 was too much manual work for my taste. But from the way you describe it, it reminded me how a typical i3 user would respond.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 day ago* (6 children)

    I really like the terminal, most of my use is a web browser or terminal with tmux.

    I use hot keys like cray, but I haven’t found a tiling window manager I like yet (I don’t like when things shift automaticallly, it breaks my mental model), and I haven’t found a Linux desktop with the keyboard ergonomics of macOS.

    But 95% of my time is with full screen terminals, so I’m actually pretty okay. I have customized vim and tmux to the hilt, and I like that.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Using Waybar I have a detailed clock and a sound widget on bottom right corner of my screen, and left of that is space for “systray” icons.

    My windows have a title bar, that show the icon and title, and a close button.

    No task bar or other navigation elements on the screen or the windows.

    I make heavy use of Alt+Drag actions for resizing moving windows around and constantly have windows rolled up so only the title bar is showing. I never minimize windows and rarely use fullscreen.

    For accessing applications in a convenient way I use the root menu on desktop rightclick and the client menu on middleclick.

    The whole setup is fully customized and built from ground up to be as least annoying and intrusive as possible.

    This is basically my setup since ca. 15-20 years now. Started with Openbox on Debian and since 2008 Arch Linux, and around 2-3 years ago I switched over to labwc on Wayland which allowed me to re-create what I used on Openbox.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    You seem to have a ton of screen real estate to work with. Is your monitor really big? I feel like using a small laptop influences what I do a lot since I'm trying to maximize my screen space.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago

    My desktop computer monitor is a 28 inch 4K screen, so yes, it is on the upper end of the median screen size, I guess. I ran Hyprland on my laptop (13 inch 1080p) for some time but I like my environment harmonized, so I use the same configuration there, too.

    For easier management I make use of labwc’s areas and snapping feature to have windows proportionally the same size on both screens. The areas use percentages by default, which makes it quite easy. I have top, bottom, left, and right, the four corner quarters and two different center regions.

    On my laptop I usually only use the center region for the browser.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago

    I seriously learned how to use computers on Windows XP, so any computer I set up for myself, I set up to be as similar to Windows XP as possible.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 21 hours ago

    Simple, decluttered and self-evident.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago

    I like the windows/kde style window navigation and always have a touchpad, not always a mouse. I'll generally use what the system offers with some requirements:

    1. Changing between windows should be deterministic with no need to look at the screen
    2. You should be able to do as much as possible from each input method (keyboard/touchpad/mouse) but not require combining them for an action
    3. You should be able to do "emergency" actions (like locking or sound control) one-handed

    Some general preferences:

    • Single desktop
    • Dock and top panel always visible, no fullscreen apps unless it's a video
    • Keyboard+touchpad shortcut to change between windows (not apps)
    • Shortcut to bring up specific app from dock
    • Touchpad shortcuts for sound and brightness control
    • Shortcuts for moving windows between screens and snapping them to the sides

    KDE and gnome can be configured for all of the above. Windows already does most of it. MacOS breaks almost everything and is surprisingly hard to configure (I don't understand how it's considered good ui). I haven't tried tilling managers, they'll probably pretty usable too.

  • source
  • I use niri since it solves the issues of positioning that you have with stacking window managers and the amount of organization needed for a tiling window manager. I can add many related windows to the same row and use super+the horizontal scroll on my mouse to scroll between windows, and the normal scroll to scroll between workspaces. I have common apps and shortcuts bound to hotkeys, but I prefer a mainly mouse-driven workflow so for everything else I am just dragging things around.

    In my browser I have a collapsed left sidebar for tabs and a collapsed top bar for navigation which I can hover to reveal, so all I see by default is the webpage.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    I have windows like desktop navigation, but have EVERYTHING hotkeyed with the maximize, minimize, exit bar barely a whisper of a thing with none of the aforementioned buttons so I can drag windows, but other than that, all hotkeys. Even almost all if my software is hotkeyed.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 3 points 1 day ago

    I see what you mean. You get rid of the buttons so you can click and drag the window bar without accidentally clicking them right? I've got everything so smushed into one bar it's like the opposite. Altho I really don't USE the buttons since I have it in fullscreen all the time and just close things from the Gnome task switcher. So maybe I'll remove my buttons too. Might be a good idea.

    This is what I mean by the bar being all smushed together:

    That's the entire screen. I messed with the browser settings to make it so I had more screen space for the actual webpage.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago

    i like tiling so i primarily use sway


  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago

    For laptops, I prefer something like i3wm or hyprland with workspaces configured (i've started playing with caelestia and noctuila shells but mostly just running waybar). That lets me avoid the touchpad as much as possible as I hate those and pushes everything to vim style keyboard shortcuts. It also lets me emulate having multiple monitors without having to view all of them (I'm terrible at multi-tasking and lose productivity when I have too many screens available).

    For gaming, I like Gnome with the O-Tiling extension (thank you for the user on here that informed me of that). That is more just due to Gnome being easy to configure and not the machine that I mainly drive.

    My main machine is just an old refurb Optiplex micro 7050 that runs a few containers and is mainly just for browsing and networking outside of that.

    All machines I have (with the exception of a work laptop) use that same vim configuration style though. The shortcuts between all of them are the same even if the applications those shortcuts open is slightly different. CTRL+ALT+F might open hyprfm on one machine, nautilus on another, and ranger on a third. So the shortcuts globally are more just thematic. Fuzzel also runs for uncommon applications that don't have shortcuts, but honestly I am mainly a terminal-first user so it's rare I actually call that.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago

    I hate using the mouse/touchpad for anything. I use spectrewm, and qutebrowser, so that I can use control/super/alt + hjkl for almost everything

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›