all 24 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 12 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Knights of Guinevere is an animation series by Glitch, the creators of some other amazing works that are freely available on YouTube.

The 2nd episode just came out the other day, the series is set in an amusement park planet, where the two main protagonists (so far) find a damaged Guinevere robot, the mascot of the park, that seems to have experienced some... brutal treatments, and is unlike all the other Guineveres.

I highly recommend their work, it's really great. The only downside is waiting months in between episodes...

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 hours ago

    Episode 2 was amazing! For more context, it was created by Dana Terrance who also made The Owl House for Disney. Main character is queer, and it’s all about being an outcast in a society that demands conformity.

    She obviously did not have an easy time of it with Disney and it shows in KoG!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 hours ago

    @grok explain this post to me

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 6 hours ago (19 children)

    I recently found out that I, Robot and Foundation are essentially within the same series. It's just that Foundation happens hundreds of years after the great robot wars.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 6 hours ago*

    Not essentially, Asimov combined his three series (robots, foundation, and empire) and a few other short stories and novels into one universe 30 years after with with foundation follow-ups. There’s a few continuity errors since it wasn’t planned like that from the start.

    Link

    One of my favorite authors and series.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 6 hours ago (16 children)

    Is Foundation any good?

    I didn’t like I Robot because Will Smith annoys me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

    The books are awesome. The concept of being able to (more or less) predict the future and trying to shepherd humanity through various crises that will alter the timeline and trying to rescue us from our own nature is a fun one.

    The nature of the story doesn't lend itself well to adaptation in a visual medium but the show is decent (it does deviate some from the books and mess around with the timeline some to make it work better for TV). Can't speak to the movie.

    The Foundation Trilogy also was published 1951-1953 and you see a lot of ideas that became mainstay scifi tropes in their early form. For example, it's easy to see the influence Foundation had on Dune.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 hours ago* (3 children)

    I only read the first one and didn't really like it. From what I remember (not much) it's just full of "plot twists" where some smoking guy randomly appears and tell the protagonists "haha, I predicted you'd do this" and then "hah, I predicted you'd know that I'd predict your next move and you'd do something different!".

    I don't know, I like the setup and the beginning but after a while it seemed silly to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 hours ago (1 child)

    It's kinda competency porn. The heroes solve problems by being clever and predicting their opponents moves. The generational aspect, where it follows multiple characters over long periods of time, is also interesting. I really like the series, and now that I think of it it's probably no coincidence that I also like JoJo's Bizarre Adventure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 hours ago

    I think it's a touch more nuanced than that but yes the plot does follow Hari Seldon's creation of a school of thought and study called psychohistory.

    The main plot is that humanity would be plunged into 30,000 years of dark ages full of bad shit but Seldon believes following his plan it can be shortened to only 1,000 years of real bad times for the schmucks born then.

    Like you said, one of the themes the books talk about is the paradox of knowing the future and if you can or can't change it. If you know the future and do something to change it to be different from what you predicted - does that mean you did or did not actually know the future?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 5 hours ago (7 children)

    The movie has almost nothing in common with the original story.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 hours ago (6 children)

    But is the tv series Foundation worth watching?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

    Yes and the best part isn’t even in the books — the Genetic Dynasty.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments