top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 4 points 11 hours ago

Used to bike and walk in that area actually... I've been hit by 11 cars. Nowhere else have I had that issue and I live in what is considered a "less bike friendly" place now. Those folk up there are aggressively hateful towards pedestrians and cyclists.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 1 day ago

    Right Wingers and their bloodlust disgusts me

  • source
  • [–] 101 points 2 days ago (6 children)

    had a car brain joke about watching bicycle accident videos and i said i watch videos of cars getting obliterated by trains, guy was super pissed at me lmao

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    What about all those billions we spent on car infrastructure they could have used? All that and they have to slow down the trains?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    trying to convice car drivers that highways and one more lane are a black hole for money is often a waste of time sadly

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 17 points 1 day ago (7 children)

    Yup. I've been on two wheels since June, and thankfully, I've only run into a handful of crazy drivers who make it a point to let met know how much they hate me being on the road.

    But even that handful is fucking scary.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 day ago (6 children)

    America uniquely hostile to non-car transport. I feel safer riding a motorbike through the densest traffic Vietnam has to offer, in the middle of a monsoon than an American stroad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 60 points 1 day ago (6 children)

    my brain read Carbarians and I think that's going to stick for me

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 49 points 1 day ago (6 children)

    Facebook doesn't give a shit either, and honestly they should be held liable if a cyclist is ever killed by someone who has ever left or read a comment like this one that Facebook chose not to take down. For the last couple of years, I've started keeping a log of all the comments I've reported on Facebook, and then updating that log if I get a notification that they took action. Very, very few have needed updating. Here's my log of not removed comments:

    image

    And here are the ones they did remove:

    image

    Facebook actively encourages extreme violence.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 day ago

    I cannot say I'm surprised. They moderate only under very narrowly defined circumstances. Thank you for keeping track of it.

    I remember they would always remove and punish me for just language. Let's say some guy says something like "Fuck fa***ts". I report it, nothing happens. I tell the guy he's a homophobic piece of shit, removed and temp ban for 3 days.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    But what if I'm inconvenienced for minutes per year due to cyclists??? I should be able to kill them!!! /s

    Sidenote, in 3 years of using Boost for Lemmy, this is the first post that crashes it consistently when I tried to load the comment view. I wonder what could possibly be going on with it. Had to use the web UI to make this comment.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 31 points 1 day ago*

    If you were joking about murdering minorities with your AR to remind them that they have their own neighborhood to go back to, you'd at least be investigated by th- Oh wait, Arkansas? Nevermind.

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 2 days ago* (18 children)

    Vehicular cycling advocates have set cycling back decades in USA, with the result being this thought.

    A car or a bicycle travelling at 30% of the speed of traffic introduces a considerable risk. It’s why bike lanes aren’t also sidewalks. But it’s not a reason for vehicular homicide!

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 day ago* (3 children)

    I get why getting behind any vehicle moving at 30% of the expected rate of speed is an annoyance, and that annoyance is doubly so when it’s a person just doing recreation.

    But what I come back to is that cycling isn’t just recreation. It’s also a legitimate form of transportation for some people who cannot drive (for various reasons) or for those who cannot afford it. It’s also one of the last remaining forms that isn’t privacy-invasive (either by the state or corporations).

    People on two wheels should be conscious of holding up traffic, but those on four don’t own the roads. We’re all in this together.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child)

    One thing people don't get is that car people think that the cyclist took his car to ride his bike as a fun activity. Nobody could be doing anything "legitimate" like going to work on a bicycle.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 day ago

    That’s also part of the Vehicular Cycling/Forester problem. Forester, distilled and paraphrased, was a proponent of “serious” cyclists, which included the MAML (Middle-Aged Man in Lycra) on racing bikes and excluded the person picking up groceries on a bike with baskets. Which summs up to “cycling is for recreation”. And visibly, the aggressive cyclists tend towards that MAML image, rather than dad picking up groceries or mom cycling to work.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    That's in northwest Arkansas. Bella Vista is like 45 minutes north of Fayetteville and full of retirees. Those facebook groups are disgusting hard right nutjobs.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (20 children)

    If it's Fayetville, Arkansas, it looks like it has some gravel and mountain bike paths, but also low-traffic mountain roads that probably have poor passing opportunities. And it also looks like people might come to cycle there.

    From Fayetteville, road cyclists will discover one of the largest road networks in Arkansas – with over 400 miles of scenic paved roads accessible from town. Low traffic density, high road quality, and diverse mountain topography make Fayetteville the ideal destination for your next road cycling vacation.

    https://www.experiencefayetteville.com/experience/cycling

    So there's a possibility local traffic is being held up by tourists cycling nowhere in particular on roads where you might have to wait a while for a safe passing opportunity, made even longer by people struggling with an incline.

    What would be a good infrastructure solution to this problem?

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    A simple solution is to have extra wide bits where the topology allows it, with the width added to the uphill side of the road. Adding an unseparated bike lane on long straighter sections or round the bend is usually going to be sufficient for relatively low-speed mountain overtakes. What you should never do is encourage anyone to overtake a cyclist going downhill.

    Here's some examples from Australia:

    image

    image

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • I’ll add that even in the US, it’s somewhat common for mountain roads to periodically have an extra passing lane, pull-off points, or an extra wide shoulder so motorists can get around slower traffic.

    So there’s really no excuse for not adding a bike lane on uphill portions in cycling heavy areas whenever those roads need to be repaved.
    …so maybe we’ll see some of that in the next 50 years…

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago

    Ha! I used to live where this meme is talking about.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›