Would software engineers ever unionise in future, if the industry keeps getting shit every year due to AI and layoffs?

all 29 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 32 minutes ago

Tech Workers Coalition exists, as does IWW, though neither fit what most folks think of when they think of unions

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 hours ago

    Some already have. It's illegal to stop it.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 5 hours ago (1 child)

    I'm in one right now. There's a ton of guilds too in the US.

    Got me a raise and fought a RTO sillyness.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 hours ago

    Tech workers needed to unionize yesterday. The trillion dollar investment to automate away white collar work should have us all organizing. Unfortunately, software engineers tend to be very tepid and don't want to rock the boat. I've also found myself contracting a lot lately which gives me substantially less power to organize. But even the tendency towards contracting is one that disempowers workers and makes them feel disposable.

    Unionization desperately needs to happen.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

    This must be US centric yeah? I am in a union in Denmark as an engineer, and was when I was specifically a software engineer too.

    I hope it can happen everywhere, it's been great for us in the few years I've been part of it.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

    Unions in Denmark for developers stay away from anything that isn't directly illegal, though, so they aren't working exactly as a union. The reason was a huge scare back when Prosa had a failed strike way back that started a huge outsourcing of development, so unions stay out of the contractual stuff. They are effectively just a "legal insurance" type of organisation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 hours ago (1 child)

    IDA? I mean they've helped me with contract negotiations and visa things before?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 hours ago

    IDA, yes, it's the case for all tech unions. They will help, yes, but mostly to ensure that the contract is legal and up to par with general expectations of the tech sector, work hours, on-call, and so on. But they won't at any point take your position, only help you understand your position so you have more levy in your negotiations. In other sectors you will see that "overenskomster" has been negotiated by the unions, so e.g. all nurses get the same pay based on experience level, the same days off, the same total hours, the same overtime compensation. You thus don't need to negotiate your contract because the union already negotiated a collective contract. No one gets left behind that way. For tech you need to negotiate that yourself and you have to do it each time you change job.

    And nice to know they helped with visa. I can't testify for that personally, so I didn't know they offered assistance with that.

  • source
  • parent
  • As their jobs keep getting devalued, by AI (whether appropriate or not), and they are increasingly treated as unskilled labor, there will be more pressure to organize in order to mitigate losses in pay and benefits.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

    If it was possible to create a union without interacting with each other, it would already be done.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 hours ago

    Am tech worker. Where do I sign?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 hours ago

    They already do in France. In the video game part of tech, too.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 7 hours ago (1 child)

    My personal bet would be no. They’ll automate themselves away and slovenly play the corporate game before unionising. As a collective that is. Perhaps there’s lots to say about the culture of the profession, but I suspect it’s just too childish and spoilt.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

    I remember an old coworker said he was anti union. "I'd just find another job if I didn't like the one I had", he said. Bold claim.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 hours ago (1 child)

    And that was true back then, which was essentially the reason why no one bothered to organize. Tech jobs were one of the highest paying jobs and it was easy to jump ship. Now with companies (stupidly) thinking AI can replace everyone, suddenly tech jobs are no longer as secure as before. And maybe that will finally start pushing workers to organize.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -10 points 6 hours ago* (3 children)

    No.

    Unionize mostly occurs for working class folks, esp those working in the public sector or for a utility/infrastructure type of service.

    Software Engineers are not working class people, they don't do public or utility types of work. There also is no point of collective bargaining for them as they don't have centralized skills or a centralized set of employers like most union jobs do.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 hours ago

    There also is no point of collective bargaining for them as they don't have centralized skills or a centralized set of employers like most union jobs do.

    If you think "software engineers" don't have skills as comparably fungible as carpenters or factory works either you're not a programmer or your code is hot garbage.

    It's also irrelevant with regards to unionization. Actors,.writers, lawyers, and doctors all have unions, and the last two are so old and so pervasive that it's easy to mistake them for something else.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 6 hours ago*

    Software Engineers are not working class people

    You're regurgitating propaganda designed to divide us.

    "Working class" mean you work for a living. If your primary source of income is selling your labor, you're working class. If you punch a clock or if you own a business where the main product is provided by your labor (electrician, plumber, small business owner), you're working class. Income doesn't matter. If you're retired, that still counts.

    If your primary source of income is dividends, interest, passive income from investments or assets, or businesses where the main product is provided by the labor of others, you're not working class because you don't have to get up and go to work every day to make a living; other people have to get up and go to work every day to make your living for you.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

    Nope. They're too economically right wing self-absorbed to unionize.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 hours ago (1 child)

    Speak for yourself. I don't feel that way. Nobody I know or work with feels that way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 1 point 3 hours ago

    Problem isn't the bunch of us, it's the one's who're getting well compensated for their work. Tech has a very uneven pay, plus it's susceptible to outsourcing. If anything Tech would require super globalized union, something that I don't think has a precent.

  • source
  • parent