all 16 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 39 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (4 children)

It was originally designed to convince people that capitalist greed and acting as a landlord is morally abhorrent and the whole system should be replaced with socialism. The idea was, and I am not joking or exaggerating at all, to play the monopoly you know, and realize that it's the worst game. Then, you play it with slightly different rules that change how land ownership and rent works, and you realize that literally everyone can win, and everyone plays cooperatively.

Then, capitalists saw it, stole the idea, and the original inventor didn't have sufficient money to fight for her exclusive rights, so now we have only the capitalist, rent-seeking shit show of a game that Parker brothers stole.

It's not "monopoly". It's The Landlord's Game.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 hours ago

    Then, capitalists saw it, stole the idea, and the original inventor didn't have sufficient money to fight for her exclusive rights,

    And this is why IP law only protects the rich. They're the only people who can afford to sue for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

    Problem was that the second part of the game was terrible at being a game whereas the part we know now as Monopoly was, compared to its contemporary board games, quite good.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 hours ago (1 child)

    But still needs house rules to make it fun to play with friends. Playing from the rulebook is miserable. Side note: it really broke my immersion in A Quiet Place that the kids were quietly playing monopoly together. That's how I knew it was a work of fiction lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 47 minutes ago*

    One popular opinion is that it is more fun with the actual rules, it is just difficult to follow the rules, especially the auctions. My computer had monopoly programmed into it when I was growing up and it was a lot of fun playing single player by the actual rules.

    The free parking pot I'm kind of ok with, even though it makes the game longer it introduces a little randomness. Otherwise monopoly snowballs pretty fast.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 8 hours ago (1 child)

    TBF: both rich and poor people pay luxury tax (tobacco, alcohol etc.) - but such taxes always affect low income people more.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 43 points 13 hours ago* (5 children)

    Monopoly is a banned game in our family since that incident back on Christmas 1999 when my sister absolutely refused to trade properties with my mom and my mom getting irrationally angry about it to the point of shattering a chair and storming out of the house.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 20 minutes ago

    It's so sad that Monopoly of all games became the number one household boardgame.

    In my opinion Catan should be the game every family owns. The trading and negotiation aspect of Catan and the balance of the game itself makes you feel like you are always in control of your own situation. You have never truly lost until the game is over. In Monopoly you will see pretty early who will win and who will lose.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 11 hours ago*

    That's because it was originally designed to convince people that it was an awful game system. Literally. The point is that it's unfair and you should hate it.

    In its pure form, the game it was shamelessly stolen from had a second play style, called "prosperity", which had slightly different ownership and rent rules, and was played cooperatively.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 13 hours ago*

    and in the game, the wealthy often want to stay in jail so they can stay wealthy. can't land on a square that costs money but you still collect rents, build, and can wheel-and-deal while in there. so jail must be more mayberry pd and less federal pen.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 13 hours ago

    Also, the game was supposed to be teaching everyone why monopolies are terrible, not as a set of goals for the epstein class.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 13 hours ago*

    And the person winning can have family members take their place, while others have to start from scratch. Or is it only the real world that's so ridiculous?

    You're insane if you want to tax the new, rich players...

  • source