all 49 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 25 minutes ago*

WinAmp was already reborn as Wacup though?

https://getwacup.com/

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 hour ago

    Loved Winamp. But over the years how many reborn announcements did it have?

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 4 hours ago

    "To take on streaming"

    In a partnership with Deezer, Winamp will be reborn as a completely new player with its own premium subscription service, with Deezer providing the white-label streaming technology and licensed catalog.

    So, basically a nostalgic skin for Deezer.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 hours ago

    kodi has visualisations

    sorry winamp

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 6 hours ago

    These owners are just whatever lawyers have gotten ahold of the WinAMP trademark.

    Anybody remember when they attempted to push out the source code for WinAMP on GitHub and failed miserably? Or included NFTs?

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 6 hours ago

    Will be reborn? If they had actually released Winamp under a real open source licence, it would have been reborn years ago! A bit late for it now!

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 7 hours ago

    I have the feeling the new version's tagline will be something along the lines of

    "WINAMP, IT REALLY SUCKS THE LLAMA'S CORPORATE COCK!"

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 7 hours ago

    Who needs it? Audacious + Winamp skin.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 8 hours ago (1 child)

    AIMP for life. Sure, it stands on the shoulders of llamas, but it's unbeatable. And it's got a native Linux version now, too!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 108 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

    It's coming back with a monthly subscription.

    It's dead already, then. WinAmp's heritage was providing a free audio player. I was looking forward to a refreshed build to test out, but I won't pay for it.

    There are a dozen better, free, maintained, and actively developed players out there. This is less than too little, and far too late. Those of us who used winamp back when it was still activly developed will continue to have nostalgia for it, but I bet it will be DOA to most of the target audience.

    I've only kept up on news for it because I was hoping it would be reborn true to itself. I have zero interest in it as a subscription model.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 13 hours ago* (1 child)

    it appears to be just an added optional feature, a winamp-branded deezer subscription and client, with the traditional local play and customization and what-not still part of the 'free' program (presumably.. details are scarce).

    but.. i left winamp years ago. i won't go back. i have playlists sorted and can just use vlc these days. idc about customizing or visualizations and that shit. i just want a player to sit in the background and do its thing. there's dozens of acceptable programs without a subscription sales pitch built in.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 13 hours ago

    Unlike traditional digital streaming platforms, the new Winamp Player will not be limited to music streaming. It will seamlessly combine premium streaming with users' local music libraries, internet radio stations, podcasts, personal cloud-based collections and other audio sources, while introducing a highly customizable interface, new social capabilities and innovative ways to discover, organize and enjoy music.

    Source https://www.engadget.com/2259236/winamp-coming-back-2027-deezer-partnership-streaming-music/

    It sounds like the local playback is the "optional" feature. That's still gonna be a no, at least for me. Fpr Hifi, I'll stick with FooBar2k, or something that is a proper hi-res FLAC player first and has bolt-ons/plugins second. The same article also links to another, they actually already released a new build of classic winamp a few years ago.

    https://www.engadget.com/winamp-mp3-player-software-returns-191027227.html

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 7 hours ago

    i hope "under no circumstances should you Check new versions of Winamp at startup" option continues to work

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 7 hours ago

    Winamp was great back then, but now anything respecting my folder sorting and supporting Milkdrop works for me.

  • source
  • foobar2000 and mpv wreck the everloving shit out of it already

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 10 hours ago

    Winamp revived: nostalgia tickled!

    Subscription warning! Go fuck yourself!

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

    WINAMP! It really licks the llama's ass!!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 65 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

    The MP3 era’s favorite player returns with a monthly subscription.

    The sub-subtitle says enough that you should just look elsewhere.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 12 hours ago

    Foobar2000 it is then

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

    It's coming back with a monthly subscription.

    All I want is a simple, nostalgic media player.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 hours ago

    🏴‍☠️

    Fuck Winamp then.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

    Again. Anyone remember Shoutcast?

    Anyway, the old versions of Winamp work just fine for playing your local library.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 hours ago

    Nullsoft's streaming server? I ran a web radio stream for a small group of friends for a short time using it. Pretty sure the only reason I ever became aware of it was Winamp's built-in station browser. It made me wanna learn how it worked. I can't remember anymore but I assume Shoutcast must've had a "publish" type option to make them show up in the list. That stream browser also introduced me to the demoscene (there was a website that broadcast various demos) and expanded my tastes in music across so many genres. RIP to Wazee and Digital Gunfire. At least SomaFM and Digitally Imported are still hanging on.

    Do you remember RipCast? Before I learned where else to look, and when #mp3z on IRC failed me, I'd use it just to be able to save those unobtainable songs. Like a digital equivalent to leaving a cassette recording the radio in hopes of snagging a few songs you wanted to keep.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 15 hours ago*

    After the "open source" fakeout that was nothing more than them trying to get free work without actually opening the source code for anyone to use, Winamp and Llamasoft or whatever their name is can get bent by an elephant.

    I won't even use an old copy in Wine at this point. They fucked up repeatedly and now nostalgia isn't what it used to be. Get fucked, losers of Winamp.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 12 hours ago

    Qobuz + jellyfin > winamp plus

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 12 hours ago* (1 child)

    Remember when it was reborn to sell NFT?
    WACUP for the win

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 12 hours ago

    I'm still using the latest winamp, a new winamp would be great but I'm never paying a subscription for music.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 15 hours ago

    More like its corpse will be reanimated in an attempt to scam people using nostalgia. Wouldn't be the first time this trick has been pulled, remember when LimeWire got resurrected to shill a scam cryptocoin?

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 14 hours ago

    I loved Winamp years ago. And I love nostalgia but not like this. I will just stick with my Navidrome instance and its tons of open source free clients.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 15 hours ago

    No, it won't.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

    Didn't they try to open source it only to nope out at the last second?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

    Not open source, their shit license didn't even allow for forks or literally anyone else to build it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 13 hours ago

    They finally released a Mac version. Still doesn’t support m4a out of the box. Dragged it to the bin so fast.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 14 hours ago

    Where are my fellow SoundJam MP users at? I still miss the Eclipse visualizer.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 13 hours ago

    Lame. I really want a super powerful local music player. One that takes iTunes smart playlists to the next level. One that can sync to an equally powerful mobile app. There's enough streaming, give it a rest.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 14 hours ago

    I read the title in the voice of one of those crazy prophets

  • source