top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 9 points 22 hours ago (1 child)

They found the bare device retained 80% of its efficiency over 300 hours

Thats pretty bad. A regular PV panel would hit that level of degradation after about 20 years.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 20 hours ago*

    indoor light

    Oh man I can use my lightbulbs to generate electricity? Dude this is going to make a killing!

    Fuck the years of the three laws of thermodynamics! Now is the time of the three laws of robotics!

  • source
  • [+] 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 3 points 22 hours ago* (2 children)

    Stick a PV panel in the window. You could do it right now. I don't think its worth doing, but if you think this is a good idea there's nothing stopping you.

    There's plenty of sensible efficient places we could stick more photovoltaics before its worth the resources chasing the tiny power output this is going to provide. Ultimately this is as silly an idea as solar freakin roadways for all the same reasons.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 day ago* (6 children)

    Why not just put the solar panel next to the window so you don't have to cover it at all? The more light a panel absorbes, the more efficient it is, which is kind of the exact opposite type of thing that you would want to cover a window with if you still want it to be a window. I'm not even going to bother addressing the inefficiencies of harvesting indoor light, other than to say it's idiotic.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    I mean, couldn't you take a solar panel and make it like an awning above the window or something? Have a system where it can pull into the window to be flush with the building if you want.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 hours ago

    You want to use solar panels to both collect solar energy AND provide shade to residents within the building? Sounds a bit too efficient for my tastes. Let's put ugly brown tints on the windows instead and collect a fraction of the energy at 10x the cost.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 8 points 1 day ago (22 children)

    Can we please stop pouring money into stupid ideas? Solar windows make as much sense as a water-soluble condom. It's the kind of hair-brained shit I'd expect to see Elon touting. An invention that is the antithesis of its purpose, dreamed up and funded by some methed out moron surrounded by yes-men and brown-nosers who is so out of touch with the world that he doesn't understand the innate purpose of the object, nor the application of the technology

  • source
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    I think it all boils down to "hey boss, I patented this new technology!", "great, let's shove it down people's throats, pour a bunch of money into getting this hyped in popsci magazines and online tech spaces, we're gonna make hundreds of millions of dollars before anyone realizes what a dumb fucking idea this is."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    This is the nature of popsci journalism for sure. Combined with the startup funding (/grift, often) hype cycle... Ugly

    One time I had a PR person from my school suit down in my office with me. He really wanted to hype oeut research. I was a wet blanket - probably overly so as I'm actually people-pleaser plus under-promise over-deliver which was incompatible.

    I ended up kinda struggling and seeing how disappointment, almost annoyance, all I could say was 'go talk to [my professor], he's much better at this'

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (17 replies)
    [–] 9 points 1 day ago

    I can see something like this as part of a system where we harvest energy from every possible surface if eventually becomes easy enough to produce and has a decent durability.

    On some windows could make sense as permanent installations and on others they could be used as movable blinds.

  • source
  • [–] 38 points 2 days ago (16 children)

    I've been hearing about this for years. The fact that it never materialized is a sign that it probably doesn't make sense economically.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    Or because people want windows to let light into their homes?

    Solar panels make sense on roofs, not windows

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 day ago (10 children)

    Boston’s logan airport has them in the newest terminal.

    They work, but scatter light in a weird way and heat up the space dramatically. Granted that these are floor to ceiling 2 story windows, might have been hot either way, but can’t have reflective coating with solar.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›