Wonderful day!

Apologies, but I am not sure why do you ask the question.

If you open your heart to the art, if you look at the sounds, feel with the soul... if you would actually listen to the world... I believe you would never ever ask such a question, since the answer is utterly obvious, and is/will always be.

"AI art" has no sense, in any music/soundscape, video-game, picture, literature... And never will. It's nonsense, it's pointless, It's awful. It's dirty. It's empty. it's noise.
And considering the current "AI", it's also a bloody sorrowful noise of screams and cries of now defaced/anonymized actual artists whose works are now meatground in the LLM datasets without any kind f permission given...

There's absolutely no space for any kind of "AI" in art unless it's used as a message or instrument in a specifically human manual work with effort and person's own unique expression, idea, their viewpoint and life experience only they could create expressing their own message how they, the unique alive ineffably magnificent individual, a miracle... can express only - this is art, a timeless communication between people, to respect, to appreciate, to care about, to love... to learn from, keep in the history, and pass to the infinitely marvelous future...

"AI" is absolutely not art. It's blatant disrespect to any artist, every human, all the art and effort in the history possible, and a reckless attitude on the dear future, too...

That is. Art is a timeless communication between human, alive, loving, for those who feel pain, who fear, who live, who discover, who evolve, who improve, who develop... who love...

Art is also you, a unique ineffably magnificent person who lives, who appeared in this infinite world, who is a... miracle...

"There are always two people in every picture…" ~ Ansel Adams

Related:
- https://lemmy.world/comment/22523235 (I tried multiple services in addition to the common as Shazam, but nothing was found…)
- https://lemmy.world/comment/23607523 (The main reason I am interested in art is communication…)
- https://lemmy.world/comment/24988288 (Please do consider capturing a moment for your works…)

the death of humanity

I think it's interesting that this question is being asked by this particular user - known for cropping the credits off of webcomic posts until doing so was made against the rules in that community.

It was an action I found to be rather anti-artist. And now they ask about another anti-artist activity.

Trick question. Slop ain't art.

Trash, without exception. It's a waste of resources, it's essentially theft, and it's never as good as using actual skills in the process. There are no redeemable qualities of AI art or the people that push it as a creative space.

Slop. Move on. It's not art.

Art is a uniquely and specifically sentient endeavour. Seeking to communicate in an intentionally more abstract way to allow for wider interpretation and attempting to touch upon something more true to the viewer by allowing their personal intepretations to convert into the viewer's internal dialogue.

Churning out "independent" genAI "artwork" is pointless because it has no intentions. And its insufficiency as a tool only means the naive user compromises on their intention to conform to the tools' limited palette and capabilities.

Whereas an actual artist, when confronted with the limitations of their tools can attempt to sublimate or evolve their ideas, the genAI user must merely settle and delude themself that "yes, this is what I wanted." Or else their "artistic intention" was so pedestrian that it could have been a declarative sentence. Indeed, it fits that their prompt to a genAI agent is equal to artistic ambition.