all 18 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 3 points 50 minutes ago

WHY THE FUCK DO I NEED TEAMS EMAIL ME BITCH

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 4 hours ago

    $11 million dollars is pocket change to a national government. Not ideal, but as a project to end reliance on a US entity, it's an investment in the future.

  • source
  • [–] 46 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

    Replacing Microsoft 365 with open-source alternatives might be the right approach to solving the sovereignty problem, but plans could eventually change. Replacing traditional software tools on aging IT systems is no easy "plug-and-play" task, as some users have remarked. The German city of Munich even tried to move from Windows to Linux in 2004, but eventually returned to the old operating system in 2017.

    Let’s hope the outcome is better this time. And i also hope the result can be leveraged by other nations.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 63 points 8 hours ago (1 child)

    IIRC in Munich the effort "failed" in good part thanks to Microsoft lobbying and bribes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 6 hours ago*

    Yeah, talked to their CTO in 2012 when I wrote an article for heise.de (sadly, never released with his statements, only broad summaries) and he basically said the politicians were intentionally crippling support for Linux so that Microsoft IT support looked better. He specifically mentioned the WollMux form system as a failed software project.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 39 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

    Perhaps I missed it in the article, but I would be curious to see how much they currently pay and what they expect to pay over a given timeframe for Microsoft software and subscription licensing.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 7 hours ago

    It was not in the article, but let me help you. Swiss bureaucracy is my speciality.

    There were two procurements in the past years, where only the minimal amount of data is publicly available. By request, they would release more data, but that’s something that takes multiple weeks. So I can only share what I have found so far.

    1. Years 2020-2024: CHF 161.69m (USD 198.02m)
    2. Years 2025-2027 CHF 139m (USD 170.21m)

    In those contracts it is not known how many licenses and which licenses were bought. So they will also include Operating Systems (client and server), and expensive licenses such as MSSQL Server. I’m sorry that I cannot share anything more useful right now.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 10 hours ago

    A small price to pay for salvation.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 10 hours ago

    It says how much it costs but how much will be saved in the end?

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 10 hours ago*

    A moral and strategic imperative.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

    Yeah, I can see the point. Moving away from Microsoft sounds good in theory, but actually replacing everything without causing problems is probably the hard part

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

    The tech is ready, the training of people is the hard part.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

    Exactly. The technology itself is probably the easier part. Getting people comfortable with a completely different workflow is where things can get complicated

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 8 hours ago (1 child)

    This comes up at my job a lot. We end up not doing things because the staff whine about it. No where else have I worked have I seen such whining. It's your fucking job. You can use whatever you want on your home computer. Now stop SSH'ing into production and fucking use source control.

    It's really a problem of poor management , here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment