Hello, it's me again

This is another article that's been going around. I talked to some comrades up in Rhode Island and apparently the author of this kind of has some eh stuff going on and was actually kind of a jerk but still here's more kind of evidence of what's going on.

Notably one thing is that they say that the PSL Miami branch is dissolved. I don't know like anything about this.

It kind of feels like live archaeology at this point, just trying to archive and document the kind of discussions that have been going on. I honestly really have incredibly little faith in the party to continue to survive and end up being the party that we need. I think a new party is clearly going to need to form.

If you have any thoughts or additional points of information that can be used to, like, bring together the understanding of what went wrong and what's been going wrong, please put it below.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 82 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (19 children)
  • [–] 55 points 3 weeks ago (18 children)

    This is the correct take. So many people in this thread acting like standing up against SA is anti communist or some bs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 3 weeks ago* (10 children)

    kind-vladimir-ilyich Lenin would shoot everyone here

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

    While exiled in 1899, Bauman had an affair with the wife of a fellow revolutionary who became pregnant with Bauman's child.[7] Bauman responded by openly mocking her, and circulating a vicious cartoon of her as the Virgin Mary with a baby in her womb, with a caption asking "who the baby looked like". The woman later hanged herself.[8]

    This story had gained wide currency among Russian political exiles by the time Bauman reappeared in Switzerland in 1902, after the escape from Kiev.[citation needed] Some of those involved in producing Iskra, including Lenin's closest friend and collaborator, Julius Martov and Pavel Axelrod, one of the founders of Russian Marxism, wanted Bauman expelled from the organisation. In 1903, the board of Iskra adjudicated the matter, and Lenin interceded on Bauman's behalf. According to biographer Robert Service, Lenin rejected the party's right to interfere, arguing that the party's task "was to make revolution against the Romanov monarchy and to vet the morality of comrades only when and in so far as their actions affected the implementation of the task".[7] The subsequent controversy divided the party, and has been described as "one of the many personal clashes which came to define the ethical distinctions" between the Bolshevik and Menshevik factions after 1903.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

    I think this is fundamentally different. First, Lenin put him on risky assignments and he eventually was the first person to die for the Bolsheviks, this seemingly escalated after the affair. Second, the moral situation is very different now in America in comparison to 1899-1905 Russia. Third, Lenin described it as "not a party affair" because these two people were not national decision makers for the party. And finally, the quote:

    "was to make revolution against the Romanov monarchy and to vet the morality of comrades only when and in so far as their actions affected the implementation of the task

    Is very different in the modern day when the majority of Americans on the left disdain the sexual predators in office and women have many more rights than in 1899 Russia. If you want to meet the base you must root them out. Also, I sincerely doubt Eugene was as important for the PSL as Bauman was to the Bolsheviks, the Bolsheviks had Bauman smuggling tools into prisons for breakouts (see Memories of Lenin by Krupskaya) and had him armed to kill Tsarists. The PSL is not capable of doing such a thing, random street gangs are far more capable.

    Lenin also had an edgelord streak. He commented on two old communists killing themselves as good because if you are no longer useful to the party you may as well die. He could've just been in favor of euthanasia when the person consents, but he loved being edgy and had to make a quip.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

    Reposting what I've said from another pizzle post

    https://hexbear.net/comment/7448695

    I'll also point out that the Bolsheviks at the time of the Bauman affair were operating as an underground, clandestine and illegal political organization that operated both inside and outside the tsarist empire. That is directly contrary to the current status of the Communist movements in the u.s who operate as open public and legal political organizations. We have to understand that at different phases of agitation necessitate different standards of operation.

    If we were to take Lenin's core belief of revolution and the party over all, then we have to adjudicate what what may have been calculated in lenin's time as something that did not affect the implementation of the task to building the revolution, then in turn today with completely inverse material conditions we have to infer that this event does affect the task of building the revolution.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • [–] 58 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    This is all very unfortunate and deeply affecting toward all members. If you've never been through a split in a group, it is incredibly stressful and demoralizing. People who did nothing wrong are being forced to take sides. I know that there have been claims that PSL has covered up assaults and have a rigid and sectarian internal structure that is self preservationist rather than deliberative and building toward a mass character. I can't really confirm the SA allegations but I have some experience with PSL members being a little too inside baseball wrt their mass work. But I have also worked closely with PSL comrades in a wide range of struggles, I have seen the same activists consistently showing up and organizing in the streets for years in my city. Their org isn't perfect perhaps but many of the people in it are fighting like hell, and now I'm sure they are going through some shit.

    PSL internals are being shared outside the internal of the org in a way I have never seen before. There are literal fascists cheering on the demise of the org. Try not to take the bait, don't drink the tea, just let this factionalism sort itself out based on the conditions set by years of organizing. Now is the time to extend a hand, invite members to things, help people create or find a new political home, whether that means transforming the org, liquidating into other groups or forming new ones. Don't stand alongside the fascists in cheering on the destruction of authentic, if imperfect, worker organization. Its time to step up as comrades, not give in to turning a legitimate internal crisis into petty drama.

    I have faith that nearly all PSL comrades do not condone or tolerate SA, I do not condone or tolerate it either. But let them figure it out for themselves and don't contribute to toxicity. PSL is made up of real people, good comrades, who are going through some shit and most of them had nothing to do with this situation that a few leaders created. I've seen splits form and take shape a few different ways, and its always ugly. Try to be human and scientific about it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 48 points 3 weeks ago* (6 children)

    Well, they clearly generated too much heat, either through their own incompetence (most likely) or through cointelpro operations (less likely but still possible). Either way, they need to purge the top brass, and get back the leadership that they lost and pursue massive internal reforms to the parties leadership committees. Likely an undoable task at this point.

    That said, this is extremely unfortunate, as local PSL leadership here in the Midwest are among the only organizations that actually have a good understanding of what is going on and understand what is actually at stake here with the ICE raids and continued surveillance, with strong theory and organizational education standards.

    However, this is clearly a repeated issue within demcent organizations, and theory needs to be developed on how to counter this in a way that does not compromise the other goals of the organizational method. It seems as though policies around abuse and democratic discussion have to be the concrete center point for such organizations to work.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    It's an issue with non DemCent organizations as well. DemCent just acts like a shibboleth in many of these conversations, it isn't actually being applied coherently most of the time. Even when a DemCent organization is functional it can often be not particularly successful at implementing DemCent.

    One of the biggest challenges is in building cadre, the people who should would be democratically making decisions. They are often underdeveloped both theoretically and practically. What this ends up meaning is that for good direction to be maintained, DemCent has to be partially abandoned to force a better decision. It happens all the time and usually relies on the good reputation and influence of leadership. But this is not sustainable. The only thing that is sustainable is the development of cadre and involving them in leadership. Orgs that grow fast are at risk of having a mass of undeveloped cadre that is unsustainable. Orgs that grow too slow because they are all about well-developed cadre (honestly I'm not sure if I've every seen one despite memes about e.g. Maoist reading groups) would presumably face irrelevance. It's a tough subject to tackle given low capacity to develop cadre in the first place and part of important discussions about party building vs base building (I don't fall strictly into either camp). I can't give specific advice except that I believe any US-based org needs to treat cadre development as the #1 priority.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 3 weeks ago

    Either way, they need to purge the top brass

    They should have done so a while ago but they dug their heels in on this issue, if they had not circled the wagons around an abuser any COINTELPRO bullshit would not have the teeth they may. This is a fundamental failure of party leadership.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 43 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    If anyone is curious how a culture of abuse, retaliation, and dominance could arise like this, the comments here are a pretty good demonstration.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 3 weeks ago

    Seriously I am so disappointed in the people trying to handwave this shit and fedjacket people calling out the fundamental contradictions of the party leadership.

    I voted for PSL for most of my life, so I am not just ragging on them on this one incident. This reckoning has been a long time coming and they had at least a decade to deal with this and other issues.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 43 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 child)

    For the sake of argument, not specifically weighing in on the truth of whatever the PSL is going though...

    If the feds successfully smear one leader with a scandal, they win a minor victory. If the leadership circle closes ranks and moves to protect the smeared leader, the feds win a big victory by bringing all of them into question.

    Anyone who is willing to take a bullet should also be willing to take a fall regardless of the truth. Any cadre based party should have a pool of replacement leaders ready to step up.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 36 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 30 points 3 weeks ago* (16 children)

    Splitting is dogshit and so are the central committee. Has anyone considered forcibly removing them? Would they call the cops to remove you if you just barred them from all areas?

    I think of Stalin regularly. He did shit like this and it was based.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • load more comments (16 replies)
    [–] 29 points 3 weeks ago* (4 children)

    This sucks so fucking bad. Mindblowingly dissapointing. I had a lot of hope for the PSL, am I wrong for thinking its looking pretty cooked?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 41 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    I think I'd try and connect with PSL members in your area, and join them in whatever next step progression they engage in. Tons of smart smart smart cadre who'll probably be finding a way to make it work going forward

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 21 points 3 weeks ago (13 children)

    So a small number of members decide to leave the party because they have a political disagreement, and they spin that into a narrative that there is no democratic centralism in the branch? And then explicitly call for everyone to leave and dissolve the branch. And they specifically mention that they are doing this in coordination with the anti PSL faction, which does actually exist as mentioned in this post, a faction which is more focused on destroying the PSL than building anything in its place. A faction which developed alongside a coordinated, dedicated effort within the US federal government to attack PSL through the courts and through other means of overt state repression.

    Understand that the state is paying lots of people to strategize on how to destroy PSL as their full time jobs (and other left wing movements). Do you suppose they are just idly collecting paychecks?

    This letter is, according to itself, written and published specifically to destroy PSL, and we have people in this very thread taking everything it says at face value. It's so very easy in retrospect to recognize the work of repressive state actions in dismantling communist organizations. But it takes a higher degree of seriousness to recognize it while it's in progress. The leaders in PSL, whom you are so quick to dismiss as ineffective, corrupt, and needing to be replaced — every single one of them is currently facing the threat of state repression head on. We all understand how serious and pervasive of a threat that is.

    It's so much easier to destroy something than it is to build something, and all I see in these threads and posts are calls to destroy. But there are hardly any suggestions on what they could have done better, or what needs to come next.

    I encourage all of you to approach this, and everything, with the level of seriousness and discipline that is actually required in being a communist.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

    The leaders in PSL, whom you are so quick to dismiss as ineffective, corrupt, and needing to be replaced — every single one of them is currently facing the threat of state repression head on.

    If they were "serious" like you describe, perhaps they wouldn't run cover for molestation because, even if we completely ignore things like personal compassion, it creates a catastrophic liability. The only threat they are facing head on is that one of their buddies loses their power. I assume I don't need to argue to you about why the direct perpetrators aren't "serious".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 27 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Getting sexually assaulted by leadership and having the other core clique of leadership cover for them is not a "political disagreement" it is a matter of safety for their members what the actual fuck. This has been going on for a long time. The Baker family is a weird cultish clique using fedjacketing to deflect from actual misconduct of top leadership.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 18 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

    If the mood on hexbear is anything to go by it feels to me like the last 10 years of work is about to disappear.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›