It's ironically comforting to think that they have an ultimate plan and goal, even if it involves killing most of us, but it's not true.
This is merely history repeating itself for the umpteenth time.
People who have all the money and power want more because they got into those positions in the first place due to the sociopathic, narcissistic mindsets.
The plan is and has always been no more complicated than, "I'm infinitely more important than you, I want it all, and you don't matter."
been saying this for decades. the civilian deaths caused by global climate change will only reduce the population to those that have the means of survival and those who are "lucky" enough to have survived.
the aftermath will provide a new playing board on which new leaders and government will administer and control the masses that are then a more manageable size.
not only do the choices made up to this point begin to make more sense but choices that have yet to be made also become more apparent.
why the push for AI? because it will supplement skilled labor and technical engineers that will be lost after the event.
why the push for automatic factories? robotic assembly will replace physical labor. you can even see this with the push for 3D printed homes.
skilled labor markets have been shrinking for decades. it's impossible to find a skilled contractor to work on your home that isn't a national corporate conglomerate, and if you do by some miracle find someone they're over the age of 60.
btw, homeownership is abysmal because corporate interests have been gobbling up properties and keeping rent sky high.
it's all related. all of it, and it's not meant to kill you. it's meant to distract you, to weaken you. just long enough that your poor environment kills you.
why else were they terrified when Luigi happened? they were terrified that an uprising was about to happen.
No, they always do this. A number of civilizations crashed in the past because the rich wouldn't adjust to reality.
Why do you think they're pushing for AI? They know the other people in their bunkers will revolt. They'll either use AI to replace people or settle for Musk's human-controlled robots so us poors can live far away while still acting like slaves.
Thanos used a statistical process for extermination outcomes. The ruling class tends to agree with Oil oligarchy because the latter helps keep them as the ruling class. Food scarcity deaths don't apply to a random statistical selection. It is poverty/national poverty based. Flood/wind damage repair/insurance is actually a significant wealth drain for highest property value markets, but Oil oligarchy disinformation will always make for the best friend of ruling class. Weapons and Zionism can team up for war policy.
The worse the country, people's lives, misery, anger get, the less focused any political debate is on improving lives/future, and simply on replacing the previous administration causing misery/anger.
Insatiable greed is a feature of the our species. It always has been, always will be, and there will always be a handful willing to destroy everything if it means they win.
I comented here with pretty much the same thoughts.
There is a million of them and 8 billion of us. We could take them. Let's go global as one world and set things right!
I think there is also a big component of “why should I behave, when the next guy over doesn’t?”
Even if you take into account stupidity, greed, narcissism, religion, rascim, hate, ect. there are constantly things happening that don’t fit.
These things actually fit quite well, when you are greedy you want something and don't care about these around you or the consequences.
Thanos didn't discriminate while in our case the richest will survive and the poor will be (more) enslaved
Slrpnk.net isa dat-a-way (☞ﾟ∀ﾟ)☞ my guy. Come join us as this take fits well. This is pretty much my take on humanity. However, hope is rebellion against the system. Don't give up.
The perception of viability of the "Thanos solution" (snap your fingers and a literal random half of every population ceases to exist) depends almost entirely on which side of the snap you find yourself on. Those for are banking on their survival. They don't care about yours.
There are, of course, a few who do want to be eliminated by the snap. They don't want to be in the resulting world, and death by snap is completely painless by any account. You simply cease to be. The only issue is you see it coming, so you have a moment to reflect. But nobody seemed to suffer for it. Just the ones who were left mourned the lost.
There's also the proposition made by The Leftovers (a TV show on HBO), that if you remove just 3% of the population, the world changes drastically. However, in that scenario, it was only on Earth, and it was only humans and, IIRC... birds? Every other population was not culled at all.
Razor of Occam. No need to fantasize about conspiracies and global shit, when greed and idiocy suffice
Vote for a #WealthTax, talk about it, tell others about it. Without their wealth, they lose a lot of power.
I agree that the Epstein class are stupid, religious, racist, and hateful. I'll also add that they're cruel, pedophilic, egotistal, and manipulative. But I don't see them being narcissistic. Narcissus just wanted to be left alone.
They'd rather be the most power in a world of fewer people than sacrifice to save them. With AI adoption potentially enabling them to retain functionality at scale, with far fewer workers, they have even less incentive to sacrifice.
top 50 comments