top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 56 points 1 week ago

That sounds like shit; thanks Apple.

  • source
  • [–] 44 points 1 week ago (26 children)

    Didn’t watch the presentation. Should I assume that anyone wearing an apple watch from now on is recording my audio without consent?

  • source
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 week ago (13 children)

    I think it’s doing on-device summarization. No transcript is retained or sent off.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago (11 children)

    This is the correct comment. But the one with the assumption is voted higher. Lemmy loving vibes more than facts, day 1,436.

    Yes, the audio is never stored, the summaries can be completely turned off, and yes, Apple again is caught inside its own bubble being ever more disconnected from the outside silicon valley life. They should not have touted this so strongly and loudly.

    People will these devices are being kidnapped daily and forced to open their devices. Even without the audio some of these transcripts can be used as evidence against them or their families, violating their 5th amendment rights.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (11 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    That’s what I’ll be assuming

    I wonder how this will be legally interpreted in states with two-party-consent recording laws

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago* (2 children)

    It’s a clever idea, although obviously many consumers are nervous about a proliferation of always-listening devices. The feature will be opt-in and obviously, Apple will tout its stringent privacy-preserving implementation compared to the competition. Apple’s version will not actually store audio recordings, nor will it present a transcript of conversations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago

    Nothing changed in that regard. It doesn’t record audio, sound recognition runs on device. In the exact same way that all modern Apple devices (watches, phones, earbuds, …) can already listen for Hey Siri, and other brands listen for their wake words etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 33 points 1 week ago

    This is the same shit companies do with their "year in review" shit - a blatant attempt to glamorize and normalize their invasive surveillance, now running 24/7.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)
  • [–] 14 points 1 week ago

    No it wont, I won't buy it.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    I want to hear the summary after just gooning all day

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    I absolutely do not need this. Journaling is healthy. Take that up instead

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 7 points 1 week ago

    Exactly. People love convenience until it removes the only actual benefits of the thing it's replacing, but by then they're dependent on it.

    If it listens to things for you so you can look at them 10 seconds later when you realize you didn't hear, why should your brain even bother paying attention to ANYTHING in the moment? If it summarizes your day, how much less are you going to remember because you're just not forcing your brain to think about what you've done today?

    I know for a fact I've gotten much better at remembering things that happen throughout my day after I started taking a note every day with what I did. If I had something recording it all for me, I'd just become even more reliant on that thing to even remember what happened at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    The new Apple Watch will track your every move.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    If I can’t turn it off, I don’t want it.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    You can turn it off. In fact it says right in the article that it’s off by default.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago

    People wearing glasses with thick rims will get sick of showing people that there's no camera and start buying new glasses.

    Apple Watch users will stop wearing their watches in public. And finally giving up wearing one altogether.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago

    We're so cooked

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago

    That's interesting. I don't see how it can generate recaps of my day if I don't ever purchase it.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago

    Oh no it won't.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago

    FYI Pebble is back and open source if you want a smart watch without all the bullshit

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    Also, is that what apple watches still look like? Eleven years and these visionless assholes can’t meaningfully evolve the industrial design of this fucking nag box?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Are you complaining about the hardware or the face?

    • Whats the point of changing the hardware? It’s a simple, shape, already comes in multiple sizes and has the number of buttons that fit.
    • Why complain about the face? Use a different one and now your Apple Watch has more design variety than a couple of dumb watches
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    “You looked at your phone for about 12 hours”. Thanks Apple

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago
    [–] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    The panopticon just got retrofitted and I’m not seeing an appropriate reaction. How is Apple getting away with what Alphabet, Microsoft, and Meta already tried and is still getting backlash for??

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago*

    That they will harvest to learn how to build a better prison around us all. People who use this shit are traitors to the very notion of freedom, or personal rights at all. They give away prices of their liberty one EULA at a time. Same strategy Putin has used to inch his way to empire without provoking an outright war with any nation that is too dangerous. Heat the water slowly and the frog never notices.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago

    Privacy concerns aside, if you need generated summaries of your own day, I don't know if I can relate to you as a person because wtf are you not paying attention to anything anyone says to you?

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›