which one is better?

all 10 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

IMO it's not even worth playing for free. I cannot believe they made it so big yet so boring and is a hassle to play, far from enjoyable.

I gave it a chance twice but nope, never gonna bother again. Even Far Cry 5 was better which was a bad game too.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Ouch, 5 was good IMO! Loved the cult style story.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Eh, I guess I could've said bad Far Cry. The story was ok. I hate drugginess/pscyhedelic parts of them starting with FC3.

    By the way, I actually liked the main story of FC6 but the game was generally so bad, it was unbearable.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Eh, it's really not a bad game. The villain is highly charismatic, visuals are very good, gunplay is as fun as in FC3 and 4 again and the world is large and detailed. It's a solid power fantasy, far better than FC5 in my eyes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Hypervisor is much riskier on Windows and more complex to use. Empress is a conventional crack.

    However, Empress' crack is based on an old build of the game, with much less content and fewer bugfixes.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)

    So I guess the best option is to just wait for an updated crack.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Not too likely at this point. The game is relatively old and few people still care about it. Not enough clout for someone to take another shot at it.

    It's also been heavily discounted already, which means there's even less of an incentive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    I got the DODI repack and it works fine in lutris

  • source