451

Nathan Pelham got into a standoff with law enforcement this year after he learned he was being charged in connection with the Capitol attack.

all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Plutonium1242@lemmy.world 167 points 2 years ago

“ Pelham paced outside, holding a gun and yelling at police. He eventually went back inside and fired the gun several times. For their own safety, police left the property that night, and let Pelham sleep off his drinking."

WHAT THE FUCK?!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 100 points 2 years ago

White privilege.

[-] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 45 points 2 years ago

Of course they left. They didn't want to get shot. You have noticed that cops kill a lot of unarmed people? It's because they don't shoot back.

[-] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 36 points 2 years ago

Are you suggesting the police take action against every drunk, gun waving neo-nazi who threatens them?!?

They'd never get any extra-judicial killings, corruption, or asset seizure done.

[-] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

Are you suggesting the police take action against every drunk, gun waving neo-nazi

We already allow the cops to police themselves.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 124 points 2 years ago

Two years? TWO YEARS?!

This is fucking nuts. These people took part in an insurrection and they're all getting slapped on the wrist, even after they get into a standoff with cops trying to arrest them.

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 49 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Any lawyer on any non-violent case where their defendant is looking at more time than these chucklefucks have done, In my view, has an absolutely valid case to say that their defendant should not serve more time than a convicted insurrectionist.

And, thereby, the system is broken.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 44 points 2 years ago

People get more than two years for getting caught smoking a joint for the third time.

[-] brothershamus@kbin.social 22 points 2 years ago

There are a lot of people in jail for over a year because they don't have $1,000 to get out. They haven't been charged with a crime yet. (Spoiler alert: They're not white)

Some of them die due to neglect. So. There's that.

[-] rambaroo@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago

If this prick were black he'd be in prison for life.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 64 points 2 years ago

If he was black, he would be dead before they bothered putting him in a squad car because he shot at the cops.

[-] rambaroo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago

And the doucheburger that incited it is still enjoying his shoe leather with ketchup on the beach.

[-] logos@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

While I agree 2 years is not long enough, the shooting at cops was while they were doing a welfare check because he was suicidal. Not when they were going to arrest him for Jan 6th. He told his wife he was gonna suicide by cop.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

I guess I was confused because part of the article made it seem like the welfare check was somehow in relation to the January 6th thing.

[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Since when are cops prepared or sympathetic towards anyone who is suicidal?

[-] oyo@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago

When they're a) white and b) political allies.

[-] BadEngineering@kbin.social 96 points 2 years ago

I really enjoyed this little tidbit "Pelham paced outside, holding a gun and yelling at police. He eventually went back inside and fired the gun several times. For their own safety, police left the property that night, and let Pelham sleep off his drinking." He shoots at police and they "let him sleep it off", any POC would be dead as a doornail if they so much as thought of the word gun in the presence of cops. But a white male insurrectionist can just sleep it off. This country is truly fucked.

[-] Hnazant@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago

They completely destroyed someone's house with a tank ram when a shoplifter ran inside to hide unarmed.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Can’t let anyone get uppity and let others think they can steal a little from Big Business. If they get away with that it will be chaos and the end of the world. That deserves instant, swift, and harsh punishment.

This dude just help threaten national stability of the country, that’s all. And those cops didn’t want to wear masks anyway.

[-] athos77@kbin.social 25 points 2 years ago

There was that shooter in Maine(?) who [over a six month period] got reported to the local police by his family, his friends and his co-workers. The cops went to his place once, he refused to talk with them, and they just shrugged and walked away.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If the mob were really progressives or antifa, they’d have a machine gun nest firing into the crowd before they ever stepped on the stairs. And that’s not saying POC. Just progressives as a whole.

[-] interceder270@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Social contract is unraveling.

[-] workerONE@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

"the FBI special agent said, and one of the officers said a shot “came in so close proximity to myself that I could hear the distinct whistling sound as the bullet traveled by me and then strike a metal object to my right side.”"

Is this real? They didn't charge him with a crime for this? Is his dad the mayor?

[-] Jakdracula@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

wow, he shoots at cops and they leave? As a result of shooting 12 rounds at cops he gets 2 years. Just, wow.

[-] BlackSkinnedJew@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 2 years ago

Fuck the fascist rioters..

[-] interceder270@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago
[-] Default_Defect@midwest.social 4 points 2 years ago

2 fucking years

this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
451 points (98.7% liked)

News

35962 readers
3077 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS