top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 9 points 1 day ago

It's not really about having more stuff. It's about having power relative to other human beings. It's the raw pleasure of dominating and subjugating others, of knowing you can bend others to your will. It's the sickness of the mind which draws to itself kings and oligarchs and plutocrats.

Persons like you and I are human; we want to uplift our peers and vice versa. We evolved to collaborate. But not all are like this. Some, by whatever mysterious circumstances there may be, become the opposite, addicted to the feeling of power and influence and control, even when it makes their lives objectively worse.

Unfortunately, there isn't in society the rebellious collective spirit there once was which would summon the energy to defeat them. I love modernity just as much as my neighbor, and to a degree, that's the problem. It is 2026, and I must apologize to Marx in saying that we have too much to lose besides our chains. I don't know how much of each other's suffering we must share until this calculus starts to tip away from inaction. Given that the reaction to impending geoclimate and political doom is, in societal terms, quaint, I'm not very expectant.

  • source
  • [–] 89 points 2 days ago (10 children)

    This is what's really crazy.

    A long time ago, I was having a conversation with a workmate. Guy earned as much as me. I asked him what he'd buy with $1 billion that he couldn't buy with $50 million.

    He couldn't name one actual experience/object that he'd need the extra money for.

    Still insisted that he wanted the billion.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    Power.

    Not a nicer car. Not a better vacation. Not a bigger house.

    The ability to buy companies, fund institutions, shape industries, influence politics, and absorb enormous losses without changing your lifestyle.

    At a certain point, more money stops buying a better life. It starts buying more control.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    Super-yachts.

    One of the main reasons these are booming is that a billionaire can spend a sum on them he might actually see on his account. Fine food, cars, even mainsons are so cheap that they earn more through passive income while they're buying these things than they're actually spending. At the same time people, even in tje ver same society, go hungry to bed or are incapable of getting their health condition improved... it's just crazy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 child)

    It used to be philanthropic stuff - because buying public opinion/legacy is pretty expensive. So you fund a big charity, do some speeches, and are celebrated for being so generous. Has the side effect of actually helping some poors.

    Seems like the major expenses now are donating money to fascists and buying big boats.

    But $1B (at today's levels of value - the number isn't the issue, the relative value and lost opportunity cost of distributing some of this back to the people is the issue) is an obscene amount of money. You could invest it in some safe asset making 2% per year and yearn $54k per day ($20M/year)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 days ago (3 children)

    Have they ever done philanthropy that wasn't for avoiding taxes or laundering money?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago

    Melinda Gates has done a lot with the Gates Foundation. I personally have been mostly funded by them for most of my career. This includes many failed attempts in some areas, and in others lead to new vaccines for meningitis for epidemic response and routine use. There are many other amazing things the foundation has funded, but that is the success I have directly been a part of.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 2 days ago*

    The reputational aspect is definitely a big part of it - they want to be seen and remembered a certain way. Bill Gates is a good example, but he blew all that up by raping children (maybe). Before the Gates Foundation, he was viewed by the public as a typical evil miserly cutthroat businessman who was also a weird nerd. Gates Foundation & making sure everyone knew about it did a lot to sway public opinion.

    And the actual people at the Gates Foundation did great work - they helped to control and eradicate deadly diseases in the global South. But it isn't like Bill was doing that work, he was just allowing someone to cut the checks.

    And it allows them to avoid taxes. They choose to pay bribes to politicians instead of paying taxes & to continue to not pay taxes.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 13 points 2 days ago (4 children)

    If you gave me the choice between 50 million and a billion I'd take a billion too; but if you gave me 50 million no one would hear from me again as I would quit my job, move somewhere quiet, and keep to myself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 9 points 2 days ago

    Still insisted that he wanted the billion.

    That demonstrates the underlying problem. When you can quantify something, people can compete over it. To most people money is THE quantifiable thing about humans. We literally call a person's money number their "net worth." It's not "oh that guy with all these relationships and virtues and vices has just seen his net assets exceed one billion." It is "he is now worth one billion."

    So with it carrying such cultural weight and such quantifiability... I guess what I am trying to say is that sometimes the problem really as is simple as "number go up." Unfortunately, simple problems can still have impossibly complex solutions. How do you change the nature of a person, and then do it en masse? How do you break one feedback loop and get into another? (the people in control would make society more decent if they themselves grew up in a more decent society)

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 53 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    It's a fight for survival and they will CHOOSE CONCENTRATION CAMPS OVER A SMALL TAX.

    No one is going to save us and no one is going to stop them. They need to go away NOW

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    It’s power.

    Not wealth.

    He’d rather kids not get healthcare than be told he is a plebe that has to follow rules like the rest of us.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 days ago

    He should be beaten to a pulp with a sign that reads "Don't be evil"

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 days ago

    These people are a danger to the world

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 days ago

    You have to cut out such sickness.

    Guillotine is the gracious choice to traitors.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 days ago

    There are a few discussions and even some studies about the rapid effects of wealth and political power, because they change how other people interact with you, it essentially gaslights you into thinking you're less fallible than the rest of us.

    We can kind of see it between the original Star Wars trilogy (when Lucas still had people able to critique him) and the prequel series (now that ILM was huge and he was ultra-wealthy).

    Twenty-first century billionaires become two degrees of separation removed from commoners at all (except the help they hire themselves), and as Paul Krugman notes, lobbyists are better dressed and more well spoken than nerdy economists. It becomes very easy for a rich due to create a self-aggrandizing information silo, in which every rich-dude intuition and conspiracy theory is affirmed.

    And the one thing that consistently feels good is seeing their assets and selves getting bigger and bigger and bigger.

    So yeah, it really is an illness.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 2 days ago (5 children)

    Hey look, it's another fucking foreigner who came over and stole from Americans and now refuses to pay his fair share

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 14 points 2 days ago

    Eat the Rich

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 days ago*

    He's wrong, greed isn't a sickness, it's a mental handicap. It inhibits the brain from experiencing empathy in people who amass great wealth and power.

    It begs the question, why are we letting a bunch of evil, mentally handicapped people steer the course of humanity?

    You'd think that if you were a doctor, and had a patient that was amassing a collection of any other thing, and that collection destroyed a part of their patients brain... You'd think the doctor (and society et. large) would want to limit the amount of that thing they were allowed to collect?

    Especially if that thing they're collecting could be used to, oh I dunno, I'm just spit-balling here, give everyone universal healthcare, increase public education to include 4 year university, give everyone free childcare, invest massively in green energy and public transportation... you know, instead of just sitting in a Panamanian bank being hoarded by evil, mentally handicapped billionaires?

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    We need to bring back tar and feathers

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    Greed is not a sickness. It's a choice. The failure to hold greedy people accountable by any means necessary is also a choice. The real sickness is looking at the state of the world and not being radicalized enough to commit to that any means necessary to hold the greedy bastards accountable.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 8 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    This type of k shape economy is what ends world Powers. Not just that but the sheer decay from the ground up of our economy. Cut education, less educated population. Out source jobs, people can’t afford to live and are now dependent on government assistance. The loss of the middle class, can keep going

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 12 points 2 days ago (4 children)

    If the billionaires are paying tk stop it, it's probably worthwhile.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 6 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    Financial obesity is neurotoxic, an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

    Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but trillionaires should be forced to transition into billionaires, and billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 6 points 2 days ago*

    the moment when 3 Work Reform posts in a row appear in the All feed:

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 days ago

    The dragon disease.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago

    These people have OCD, which manifests itself as financial hoarding. If someone had so many cats that it was negatively impacting the neighborhood, and they were STILL actively attracting and breeding MORE cats, making the neighborhood even worse, the authorities would step in, get treatment for the offender, and find new homes for all those cats.

    That's what they should do with Sociopathic Oligarchs.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 days ago*

    The program works as programmed. The name of the program is capitalism. They are cogs in the machine just like we all are. The difference is, they are rotating in a different position in the machine.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›