Squeezes water from a rock
Actually having them squeeze water from rocks is one of the approved recovery methods. Nestle had that one added in, so it has to be a few billion gallons for each $1, but it's going to be bottled and sold as the pure, clean taste of human suffering so I imagine it will sell well.
This sounds more expensive than the fines they seek.
Honestly, it's safe to assume that if an American went to foreign soil where people got deported to and demanded money, many of them would not return.
Mexico should lock these people in prisons and charge them while they await trial before deporting them back to the US
What an idiotic waste of money. At least only the dumbest worst people will be doing this. Can you imagine showing up to a place people are escaping due to gang violence and death threats and telling someone who was possibly making below minimum wage while in the US that they need to give you money? Hopefully these people come from well to do families because I can't see them making it out otherwise.
Realistically these people are going to be taking vacations on taxpayer dimes and harassing locals who already have reason to hate us.
There are no words for how stupid this is. Truly the worst timeline.
I suspect a lot of these collection agents are going to and dissapear
I'm sorry, the US deports paperless immigrants and when they've been succesfully deported asks them to pay for being deported?
And to do that they hire more goons who have to come up with creative solutions on how to do that? Outside the USA?
How much more cynical and absurd can it get?
This country seems to have a neverending supply of spineless amoral assholes who are "willing to do what it takes".
Capitalism doesn't have a bottom of the barrel. You can keep scraping away that bottom for decades, and you'll always find someone willing to debase themselves morally for a chance at becoming part of the aristocracy temporarily.
and get that person to photograph their own face as proof that a fine notice was delivered
Whose ridiculously stupid plan is this, exactly? I would love to know who actually proposed this. I swear this is just one giant trolling routine
The agency told bidders it had not identified a way for people without a U.S. bank account to pay what they owe, and said the winning contractor would have to propose a solution.
LOL how about how do you plan to enforce a fine on someone in another country? Are you going to invade them all?
Okay, suppose I'm a guy who got deported from the US and now I live in Honduras. Some gringo comes to my door, takes a picture of my face, and says I owe the US government $1000 for being deported.
Why in the ever-loving fuck would I even consider paying any money at all? What are they going to do if I don't pay? Un-deport me? Assuming the Honduran government doesn't have any interest in enforcing those fines, why would anyone ever pay them?
U.s agents are definitely going to be getting murdered doing this.
No agents will be going anywhere. This is just a handout to 4 firms, presumably shell companies connected to the contracting office. Just theft of taxpayer money, the US government currently is just a free for all scam machine for insiders.
One would hope.
Also, not agents. Contractors.
Woohoo yet another reason to invade a foreign nation 🥳
kinda sounds like they're working up some manufactured consent to me...
Don't get me excited!
Yeah that's what I don't get either
And if they don't pay? Will they be double deported?
Next they will build factories and make people work their debt off. You know, a little light slavery.
Super imported, which means invaded if trump gets hurt feelings
Lmao. Fuck this country.
The cruelty is the point.
america must be really proud of itself, inventing ever new ways of sticking in the knife and twisting it.
This is how he plans to make Mexico pay for the wall
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News