Leave the autism out of this, AI Bros are narcissists, whether they have autism or not isn't really relevant.
-An Autist that can't draw, write or code worth shit, but still hates genAI with a passion.
Leave the autism out of this, AI Bros are narcissists, whether they have autism or not isn't really relevant.
-An Autist that can't draw, write or code worth shit, but still hates genAI with a passion.
This is a bad person even outside of the Ai context.
"I get a dopamine hit from emotionally disturbing other people"
this is a bad person.
Dawg that isn't autism, you're just an asshole.
The trait all assholes share isn't their religion, race, gender, sex, neurological status, or social class.
It's that they're fucking assholes.
Yeah that "speedrunning" shit is not autism. That's just being an asshole. An autistic person would probably know the difference, which I guess is ironic.
Ai bros, are factually the dumbest people to ever live
Fuckin hell. I'm Autistic, but I'm not like that. Can't claim Autism for being a gobshite.
Just to weigh in here- as an autistic person myself one of the things I love about computers is how predictable and repeatable they are. Yes, I know that bit flipping and memory errors exist, but compared to human brains computers are consistent and beautiful. I largely try to model my own mind on how computers work.
I find AI to be absolutely disgusting for how it violates this. All of the other issues are important but solvable (the economic and social impact, the environmental impact, copyright issues, safety guardrails, etc). Like, I dont expect any of then to be fully solved but I could imagine a world where they are mostly solved. They are technical and legal challenges. Renewable energy infrastructure, universal basic income, reverting copyright law to pre-Disney levels, and a bit of responsible stewardship could do wonders (though I dont expect any of that to actually happen). The core concept of making computers less certain is not solvable, but a fundamental aspect of the design that I find abhorrent.
Finally someone who says it
I never got the point of asking an unreliable non deterministic model to write code for you when programming languages are literally right there, they almost always do exactly what you write
And there's plenty of deterministic ways to do code assistance too
These clankers and AI Glazers tend to have dark personality traits. I am not surprised that they are so callous and cruel towards people just to glaze their latest golden calf (which will fail, as it is so very hated). How very heartless of them, unsurprisingly they have a paid blue check mark on a fascist site.
which will fail, as it is so very hated
Even if everybody loved AI, there's no way it could succeed. The more popular it becomes, the more money they lose.
It is envy, I suppose.
Us true autistics don't get a thrill from pissing people off or stealing because autists have a strong moral compass.
I'm now pissed about the theft of this art AND this assholes suggestion that autists are to blame.
This makes me wonder why we haven't yet seen an AI bro beaten into a bloody pulp for being an AI bro. The artist community sure has a lot of patience.
Yeah, the answer is that most of the creative community is a bunch of tolerant lefties. Not exactly a group prone to random extreme violence.
The same autist will then frothing from their mouth when someone steal their approach and then limelight.
thst must be a 4chan transplant
I hope the fury of a million meth-fueled fire ants set up a colony in this person's urethra.
Do these people really think themselves autistic because they know enough English to ask Claude to put together a scraper?
For people that like messing with technology, couldn't writing an AI poisoner software also hit the same dopamine spot?
top 50 comments