125
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

China has had production EVs with sodium ion batteries for 2 years. I wonder when scientists will invent Freedom sodium so I can buy one in America.

[-] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago

Unfortunately that's communist technology, so it's banned for your own good.

Real patriots only drive pickups that burn through fuel like AI data centers burn through water.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

Sodium cells last about half as many cycles as lithium. Poor choice for a car.

[-] Squizzy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

And those ones are lasting longer than anyone expected.

They are cheaper to produceand safer, make replaceables easier ad get with the new tech.

[-] JustEnoughDucks@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 day ago

That is amazing! I have just started making sodium ion battery chargers in my free time.

The bad thing abouslt sodium ion is that traditional CC/CV charging is harsh on the cells. Optimally each cell had to be CV charged at around 97.5% of its voltage end and then slowly brought up to 100%. Apparently that is how you get the most life cycles per cell

[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 day ago

Why bother with the last 2.5% at all?

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 hours ago

They don't. Outside of the lab, they just recalibrate and call 95% "100".

[-] JustEnoughDucks@slrpnk.net 6 points 8 hours ago

Good question!

Sodium ion already had a reduced capacity (30% less at least than Lithium ion). And 2.5% of voltage is not 2.5% of capacity, something more like 3-4% (still small)

You could then just choose to use a configurable lithium ion IC, but almost all of those have an undervoltage lock out (safety shutoff) that is 2-2.5V that you would have to stay above. Sodium ion drops out at 1.5V, so I would again be losing a chunk of capacity. If I lost 30%-35% of capacity on an already reduced capacity cell compared to lithium ion, then battery life would be quite disappointing.

Do that rules out using a standard Lithium-ion charger.

If I am building a custom charger anyway (most non- embedded systems have custom chargers), then might as well put in all the features now and get 100% of the capacity. Cells usually also have a higher lifespan (double or more) by dropping that high CV charge voltage 0.1V or so and settling for lower capacity, but Sodium Ion lifespan is already 3000-5000 cycles compares to lithium's 500-1000 (lithium ion and li-po, lithium iron phosphate is in the higher range) so might as well then use the full capacity.

[-] jinwk00@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Some people who are like "I bought 100% of my product so I shall use 100%"

[-] Epp@lemmus.org 3 points 1 day ago

Can this technology be used to retrofit existing devices with batteries of higher energy-density, such as phones, laptops, and mobile game consoles? Or is it really only feasible/worthwhile for large capacity usage?

[-] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Not limited to large capacity, but to low-density applications where size isn't critical. Also anywhere that very cold weather is likely

So no wearables, phones, etc... But more stationary applications.

But solar mesh nodes (home or agricultural/industrial), off-grid pumps, power banks (camping style), home solar storage, lead acid car battery replacements, weather stations, electric toothbrushes, lights/lanterns, light tools like laser levels, toys and RC cars/boats, etc... Things that traditionally used alkaline batteries (often recently switching to Lithium for recharging) are often good applications.

[-] AngryPancake@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago

Good Lithium-ion batteries have around 350 Wh/kg, so if you retrofit your devices, you'd be cutting out almost half the capacity, so at the moment it's not feasible yet.

Once the form factor is there and the loading voltage is the same (or the charging circuit can be replaced), I don't see why it shouldn't work

[-] Robin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

For high energy density lithium ion is still king.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 hours ago

At room temperature 25C. In colder environments, lithium is shit.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

25% less than lithium.

[-] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 points 1 day ago

There was a recent e-bike company claiming to use this sort of technology but they were full of shit.

As cool as it is I hope it doesn't become the new hype words for investors.

this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2026
125 points (97.7% liked)

Green Energy

4536 readers
116 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS