this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
889 points (96.8% liked)

memes

10457 readers
2841 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That would be 2.2 terabytes. You are on the right track though and metric system conversion is part of the problem. 1000GB != 1024GB. 1,024GB is correct while HDD manufacturers use 1,000GB, which is also correct, but still not equal to 1024GB. (I just confused myself thinking through the conversions, but you get the idea.)

The other part of the problem is hidden partitions used for recovery or performance. There are other things like FAT and such, but I don't know the modern file layouts these days. (Its probably the same as it always was, TBH.)

The space is usually, mostly, there. It's just hidden and preallocated.

Edit: Forgot about boot partitions as well. That's a thing. Additionally, I have seen more than one instance of someone doing 1:1 drive copies without adjusting the partitions for a larger drive. That is less common these days but probably still happens.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Ah, as I was typing it I was wondering if I had it backwards.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Did you forget to send in the mail-in rebate?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Windows can't count, so there's the problem.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Maybe it's in the over-provisioned storage space!

Yes, I know it's because of the units conversion, but there could actually be 2 TB of NAND even though it's not accessible to you.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›