98
Welcome To The Resistance: Meet The Workers Dodging (And Sabotaging) Their Employer's AI Mandates (aftermath.site)
submitted 1 month ago by to c/programming@programming.dev
19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 19 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 43 points 1 month ago (15 children)

I cannot for the life of me understand AI mandates.

Who doesn’t want to be able to get their work done easier? Nobody.

Then it follows you shouldn’t have to tell your employees to use a tool if it makes them however much as productive as CEOs think that tech demo should make them.

I think it’s pretty obvious that at the exec level AI is the ultimate hoodwinking machine. It’s made 90% of them look like the out of touch morons they are. The 10% or whatever that aren’t trying to force this down their staff’s throats in the hopes they can replace said staff are coming out smelling like roses.

Don’t fit a square peg in a round hole.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
    •
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    If AI actually made people faster and more productive, they could simply set faster timelines and people would use the tools.

    There are AI mandates because the people in leadership are stupid and dishonest. "Return to office" has the same shape. For many people working from home is healthier and more productive, and it's better for the environment not to commute as much, but the emotional needs of leadership are primary.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (4 children)

    If AI actually made people faster and more productive, they could simply set faster timelines and people would use the tools.

    I want to work with your team. I work with a sysadmin who, rather than using the up-arrow, will scroll up in his terminal to copy / paste the last command he ran. Even if that command was just "ls -l".

    It's maddening to watch and horribly inefficient. But he's always done it that way.

    Many people simply do not seek a faster way of doing things.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Many people simply do not seek a faster way of doing things.

    Right. But if you're a soulless manager, and you set faster timelines, you PIP and fire the people who don't make it. They'll use the tools or be replaced.

    It's the same as an AI mandate, except less stupid. (It can still be stupid if you set the timelines impossibly fast, but management is not known for being smart or informed)

    I wouldn't do this as me because I'm not a soulless manager.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Who doesn’t want to be able to get their work done easier? Nobody.

    While this seems true, this is not my experience. It is easier to do things they way you have always done them, because it involves no learning, and thus some people will continue unless forced.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Every fucking customer hates our AI answering the phone. Yet USAA insist that customer use it. A lot of customers have told me they are considering going somewhere else for insurance over it.

    Unfortunately I think most of the another use it too. At least with All state, progressive, and state farm and some other have local agents. But can promise the Allstate one only do sales you got issues or questions they direct to customer service that uses AI to answer the phone.

    Fuck up part we all using the same AI tool even phone companies.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    I dumped my phone company over their AI answering system.

    It was totally broken:

    • you can’t know when the AI is lying or will do something it says it will for you
    • it’s not designed to be helpful, it’s designed to keep you away from humans
    • this particular system required you to say a correct and available time you want a callback, and if you were incorrect it would hang up on you.

    I’ll bet the cost metrics looked great, 100% of calls being handled without a callback! Oh, the customers leaving is unrelated, talk to the retention department.

    Just utter fucking stupidity. No, not stupidity, complete disregard for the customer to serve some department heads self interests. There needs to be a word stronger than greed…

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Some companies are in a race to the bottom on customer service, quality and customer satisfaction. They seem to assume the hogs will continue slurping up what's at the trough. It's allowed some to take marketshare that's been off the table for upstarts for the last 20 years. Example: Independent game developers on Steam, some of which are lone developers without a team, now have a healthy business thanks to the big AAA game companies faltering. It's not 100% about AI, but that's part of the issue they have. Knowing when to rely on AI, possibly allowing a reduction in staff, versus when they're over-relying on AI, seems elusive for them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    I (like most devs) could always crap out low quality contributions very fast before LLMs, they could just lower the standards like they are doing now and they can see productivity and tech debt going 10x

    What's even funnier (at least in my current workplace), the budget for LLMs is capped at 20 usd monthly per dev, I can go though that in a 2 hours session with Opus. So make up your fucking mind, do you want the 10x output (and tech debt)? or you don't?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    The fist in that image looks very weird to me. When I make a fist and look at it from the same angle and compare that to the image, the pinky in the image is too far towards the middle of the hand and not close enough to the edge, and the thumb extends way more to the right of the arm than mine does. I wonder what this hand looks like when not on a fist, or if it's an AI generated image.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •