top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 99 points 1 month ago (13 children)

I'll vote for the candidate who shoots down the most Flock devices (cameras, drones, executives et cetera).

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 69 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    This is a terrible, myopic way to decide who becomes your representative, and I'm honestly sad Lemmy is even upvoting this.

    You need a points system, otherwise everyone's going to min–max on the low-hanging fruit. "The most" is too basic a metric, but of course as always, Lemmy doesn't understand the practical realities of politics.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Yeah, the ones on private property like mall parking lots are worth the most by far.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    The executives? I dunno, I feel like they'd be worth more if done on a public sidewalk. For tradition's sake.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • Don't want people to completely ignore the easy ones though. Maybe eligibility for the high-value target bonus is unlocked by taking down a certain number of the common (low-hanging fruit) devices. Track everyone's stats, work out the daily average, make that the cut-off so anyone below that number gets a reduced award instead of handing it to cherry-pickers. Some kind of MMORPG-inspired mechanic like that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Total height of cameras removed

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Every flock camera is 1 point, every firebombed data center or Tesla manufacturer is 5. Winner gets my vote!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 91 points 1 month ago

    I only know one thing about this man and I like it.

  • source
  • [–] 43 points 1 month ago

    Elect him now

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 1 month ago

    Now this is a political ad campaign.

    Bravo.

    The current sitting President is a multiple convicted felon, for, you know, actual heinous crimes.

    That line has been crossed.

    When tyranny becomes law, crime becomes a duty, a public service.

    I can't say I know or agree with the entirety of this guy's politics and policies, but goddamn if this is not very clever free marketing for himself.

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago (21 children)

    Those bullets have to land somewhere. Use a hacksaw instead.

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 month ago (17 children)
  • [–] 21 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    That conditional is doing a lot of heavy lifting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (11 children)

    Ricochet and penetration can happen even if you're on target. The thin shielding of these cameras isn't going to do much to stop a bullet. There's certainly more responsible ways of going about this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    A shotgun with medium-weight birdshot would work well and wouldn't pose much risk of bullets falling on people. (Birdshot is too light to hold much velocity for long, and even if pellets hit people when coming back down, they'll be small enough and moving slow enough to be harmless.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (8 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (6 children)

    Eh, .22 suppressed is good for not getting caught yourself, but could still be dangerous to bystanders if you miss or go through the target.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (5 children)

    I disagree. If I’m using a can and not wanting to get caught, I’m using subsonic, which, absolutely will not have the energy to do anything.

    Even super sonic, you’re talking about a couple hundred yards, max. With the precision of shooting one projectile. Your shotgun is going to be just as dangerous, and shooting a spread. So, good luck not missing your target.

    In case you’re curious, I used to run a gun store, and I was an infantryman, I’m not going to say I definitively have more experience than you, but, it’s likely. I know SWAT guys that carry .22 specially for shooting lights.(well cameras these days but they won’t say that)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    If Trump can be elected after his crimes, so can this man.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Yeah, but Donvict didn't conduct his crimes against property like this guy.

    To hear the cons tell it, BLM riots set entire cities on fire, and the property of businesses were harmed. This, plus mandated shutdowns were the "real" crimes we should have all been more concerned about, as opposed to murder-by-cop or a bungled Covid response that kill a huge surplus of Americans that didn't have to die.

    I'm just sayin' - the cons tend to place far more value on property. If Donvict raped some children and some women that's gonna be met with a collective yawn by the conservatives because no property or businesses were harmed...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago

    Hey, we can re-use those "I'm voting for the convicted felon" t-shirts!

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    The hero we need.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Why is a simple act of vandalism a felony?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    It probably has something to do with using a gun.

    The 2nd amendment only protects your right to purchase and own a gun. Not only is using a gun often illegal, it's grounds for summery execution. You know, freedom.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago*

    Its the dollar amount the gun stuff would generally be separate charges. Sort of like theft over $500 is a a felony but not under. Of course that varies state to state.

    I'm surprised they didn't hit him with "unlawful discharge of a firearm" because that is what this is. Or "commiting a felony with a firearm" charges.

    Still agree with it though!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    I wonder why he admitted to it 🤔 coerced?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    You're supposed to admit to your actions openly for civil disobedience. It gives you standing to challenge and opportunity to drag things to light. Even now, everyone being tried for this creates headlines that unattributed destruction does not

    At higher levels, it can also clog the justice system and make it expensive to continue targeted policies

    Without all that, it's just property destruction. Flock could probably have examples made of people caught (seeing as somehow they seem able to sidestep the law), but that frames the issue in a better way for flock

    Taking the justice system head on is just a much more effective method of forcing change... Granted at a personal cost, although getting caught by the big brother machines themselves seems likely

    Or it could be for political advantage...I mean, the cameras are wildly unpopular and badasses who cut (or shoot) through red tape are very much currently in style

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    Without all that, it's just property destruction.

    Counterpoint: wage war against the State and Capital.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Counterpoint - that's ineffective messaging. It doesn't win over people not already on board

    Instead, if you focus on concrete material conditions, like affordability and healthcare, nearly everyone agrees. Or in the case of flock, you roll it in with datacenters and the AI bubble in general

    Winning under a banner of socialism is impractical, but socialist policies are rapidly rising in popularity across the board. If it goes down easier calling it progressivism, who cares? I just want good things

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    The AI "editing" is really coming through strongly in this article.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Showing off his Tennessee cred

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    I was just about to post this!

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›